I firmly believe the proposed changes in membership for spa access are over inflated and do not represent a fair price increase but rather a prompt recoup on cost for a broken plunge pool that is not the fault of the members. Please review the price.
I
Irene Goh
7 years ago
Featured
We joined the platinum level of membership on the basis of being able to use any club. Restricting access to certain clubs does not sound like ‘platinum’ membership and is a clear downgrading of our existing membership benefits, completely unacceptable.
G
gleneson mark
7 years ago
I dont think the cost to use other clubs should double in price I have been using other clubs for a long period of time as I move around the uk it's one of the best thing to be part of David Lloyds, i am on a corporate membership which domt seem to matter i have been a member for many years i am now considering to end my membership and look else where
S
SIAN MANCHANDA
7 years ago
Just No NO NO NO NO
A
Andy Annetts
7 years ago
Changing the rules for existing members seems unfair especially when you consider that Hampton members get preferential treatment with court bookings at Heston. Feels like double standards are being applied.
M
Michael
7 years ago
Long standing and committed members who already pay high premiums compared to DL competitors are being penalised for their loyalty. Policing the facilities against guests, non members and gatecrashers should be considered to restrict spa activities to members only
J
jaspall udhian
7 years ago
it's not correct to penalize members especially joined in 1996
A
Alex Lorenz
7 years ago
I only use DL Hampton a few times a year and even then the Spa is not at all ‘crowded’. This appears to be a scheme to force members to fork out more money. Completely unacceptable downgrading of membership, will consider leaving DL if this is implemented.
I firmly believe the proposed changes in membership for spa access are over inflated and do not represent a fair price increase but rather a prompt recoup on cost for a broken plunge pool that is not the fault of the members. Please review the price.
I
Irene Goh
7 years ago
Featured
We joined the platinum level of membership on the basis of being able to use any club. Restricting access to certain clubs does not sound like ‘platinum’ membership and is a clear downgrading of our existing membership benefits, completely unacceptable.
G
gleneson mark
7 years ago
I dont think the cost to use other clubs should double in price I have been using other clubs for a long period of time as I move around the uk it's one of the best thing to be part of David Lloyds, i am on a corporate membership which domt seem to matter i have been a member for many years i am now considering to end my membership and look else where
S
SIAN MANCHANDA
7 years ago
Just No NO NO NO NO
A
Andy Annetts
7 years ago
Changing the rules for existing members seems unfair especially when you consider that Hampton members get preferential treatment with court bookings at Heston. Feels like double standards are being applied.
M
Michael
7 years ago
Long standing and committed members who already pay high premiums compared to DL competitors are being penalised for their loyalty. Policing the facilities against guests, non members and gatecrashers should be considered to restrict spa activities to members only
J
jaspall udhian
7 years ago
it's not correct to penalize members especially joined in 1996
A
Alex Lorenz
7 years ago
I only use DL Hampton a few times a year and even then the Spa is not at all ‘crowded’. This appears to be a scheme to force members to fork out more money. Completely unacceptable downgrading of membership, will consider leaving DL if this is implemented.
I firmly believe the proposed changes in membership for spa access are over inflated and do not represent a fair price increase but rather a prompt recoup on cost for a broken plunge pool that is not the fault of the members. Please review the price.