We the undersigned are against the installation of a 5G Mast at the site location as set out in planning application PRAP/21/00005/MNR, Danescourt way, Danescourt. It will dangerously obscure the view of motorists exiting Heol Urban. It will be sited too close to residential property. We are opposed to any mast at this location.
I am honestly stunned by how many of you have stepped up to help protect our neighborhood. This momentum belongs entirely to the residents who refuse to let this site go ignored.
47 Comments
B
Bev Sarin
5 years ago
Featured
There are already 2 other masts in this area. A THIRD mast is detrimental to local people in a number of ways, including stress/mental well-being, financial (impact on house prices), safety (visual obstruction/distraction) & potential ‘layering’ of emissions from 3 masts on physical health.
This is not a fair or appropriate place to add this mast.
R
Rae Christian
5 years ago
Featured
I live in close proximity to the position of the proposed mast. It will be visible from inside my home and tower above my garden. I feel it will have a real negative impact on my life. I have invested time and money in my home and I feel that my concerns have not be taken into account (along with other nearby residents).
S
Seimon Brown
5 years ago
Featured
This mast is going to cause accidents by restricting the visibility for people emerging from Heol Urban.
It's also inconsiderate of a company to even think that a structure of this size should be built so close to peoples houses
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
Featured
The house in the picture is mine and I live here with 2 children. As many people have said there are many health worries with this type of mast, also worried about house values etc. I have written to the planning office about this also. Happy to sign this petition
D
Davis Smith
5 years ago
Featured
I believe the masts are a danger to health, should not be erected in a residential area, close to houses and close to Danescourt Primary School. They are a blot on the landscape and should not be built on a small area of grass.
G
Georgina Hambly
5 years ago
Featured
No consideration or thought has been put into this . This should not be so close to a residential area and close proximity to properties. From an estate agents point of view, I can confirm this will make the properties within close distance and within view less desirable and will most likely Impact a future sale.
T
Thomas Trottier
4 years ago
5G causes damage to humans, animals, and and requires a vast amount of High Voltage Electrical Current which our power grid can not support.
We the undersigned are against the installation of a 5G Mast at the site location as set out in planning application PRAP/21/00005/MNR, Danescourt way, Danescourt. It will dangerously obscure the view of motorists exiting Heol Urban. It will be sited too close to residential property. We are opposed to any mast at this location.
I am honestly stunned by how many of you have stepped up to help protect our neighborhood. This momentum belongs entirely to the residents who refuse to let this site go ignored.
47 Comments
B
Bev Sarin
5 years ago
Featured
There are already 2 other masts in this area. A THIRD mast is detrimental to local people in a number of ways, including stress/mental well-being, financial (impact on house prices), safety (visual obstruction/distraction) & potential ‘layering’ of emissions from 3 masts on physical health.
This is not a fair or appropriate place to add this mast.
R
Rae Christian
5 years ago
Featured
I live in close proximity to the position of the proposed mast. It will be visible from inside my home and tower above my garden. I feel it will have a real negative impact on my life. I have invested time and money in my home and I feel that my concerns have not be taken into account (along with other nearby residents).
S
Seimon Brown
5 years ago
Featured
This mast is going to cause accidents by restricting the visibility for people emerging from Heol Urban.
It's also inconsiderate of a company to even think that a structure of this size should be built so close to peoples houses
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
Featured
The house in the picture is mine and I live here with 2 children. As many people have said there are many health worries with this type of mast, also worried about house values etc. I have written to the planning office about this also. Happy to sign this petition
D
Davis Smith
5 years ago
Featured
I believe the masts are a danger to health, should not be erected in a residential area, close to houses and close to Danescourt Primary School. They are a blot on the landscape and should not be built on a small area of grass.
G
Georgina Hambly
5 years ago
Featured
No consideration or thought has been put into this . This should not be so close to a residential area and close proximity to properties. From an estate agents point of view, I can confirm this will make the properties within close distance and within view less desirable and will most likely Impact a future sale.
T
Thomas Trottier
4 years ago
5G causes damage to humans, animals, and and requires a vast amount of High Voltage Electrical Current which our power grid can not support.
There are already 2 other masts in this area. A THIRD mast is detrimental to local people in a number of ways, including stress/mental well-being, financial (impact on house prices), safety (visual obstruction/distraction) & potential ‘layering’ of emissions from 3 masts on physical health. This is not a fair or appropriate place to add this mast.