THINK OF THE IMPACT THAT AN EXTRA 1500 PEOPLE AND 750 CARS WILL HAVE IN LINSLADE.
MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD!
PLEASE ENSURE ALL EMAILS/LETTERS OF OBJECTION ARE LODGED BY 11TH FEBRUARY 2015 - GO TO DISCUSSION PAGE FOR DETAILS.
Check the discussion board for information on how to oppose the application.
To keep yourself up to date:
Remember to check in here and share this petition with friends:
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/valleyfarm
Follow the facebook group
https://www.facebook.com/groups/112848595404364/?ref=ts&fref=ts
Updates
February 7, 2015
The council remains silent on our concerns but we know they are watching the count climb. Go to our Facebook group right now to find the contact details for your local representative and send them a direct email today.
February 7, 2015
We reached a significant milestone in our opposition to the Valley Farm development today. Send an email to your local representative right now to demand they protect our infrastructure. Post the link to this petition on your Facebook timeline to warn our neighbors about the traffic impact.
Reached 100 supporters
February 7, 2015
90 Comments
This is an island development that turns its back on the existing community of linslade. It is unsustainable as relies on car ownership. The financial benefits in terms if s106 contributions will go to Aylesbury Vale while the social costs will be met by Leighton Linslade Council tax.
As chairman of the Central Linslade Residents Association, I and the members of the Association, recognise that the area environment can not support a development of this size and nature. It must be stopped.
as a local resident for over 30 years I am totally against the scheme. It would bring disruption to the community with extra transport the roads cannot cope with, along with destroying beautiful land and wildlife.
The extra traffic around the station and Soulbury Road and A418 at peak times will bring the whole place to a stand. Hard enough to get a Drs appointment now, extra load on our resources is just too much. Whare will the sewage go,? Our drains are overloaded when it rains even now.
The Valley Farm Development is not sustainable and creates avoidable strains on the infrastructure of neighbouring Linslade specifically; traffic congestion, parking, schools and doctors surgeries. It will also avoidably spoil the beautiful views as you approach this historical market town.
wildlife ,Greenberg
wildlife ,Greenberg
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Copy link or share directly
THINK OF THE IMPACT THAT AN EXTRA 1500 PEOPLE AND 750 CARS WILL HAVE IN LINSLADE.
MAKE YOUR VOICE HEARD!
PLEASE ENSURE ALL EMAILS/LETTERS OF OBJECTION ARE LODGED BY 11TH FEBRUARY 2015 - GO TO DISCUSSION PAGE FOR DETAILS.
Check the discussion board for information on how to oppose the application.
To keep yourself up to date:
Remember to check in here and share this petition with friends:
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/valleyfarm
Follow the facebook group
https://www.facebook.com/groups/112848595404364/?ref=ts&fref=ts
Updates
February 7, 2015
The council remains silent on our concerns but we know they are watching the count climb. Go to our Facebook group right now to find the contact details for your local representative and send them a direct email today.
February 7, 2015
We reached a significant milestone in our opposition to the Valley Farm development today. Send an email to your local representative right now to demand they protect our infrastructure. Post the link to this petition on your Facebook timeline to warn our neighbors about the traffic impact.
Reached 100 supporters
February 7, 2015
90 Comments
50 houses would be stretching what could reasonably be considered sustainable: 300 houses is merely a cynical proposal with complete disregard for the quality of life amongst existing and proposed new residents.
This is an island development that turns its back on the existing community of linslade. It is unsustainable as relies on car ownership. The financial benefits in terms if s106 contributions will go to Aylesbury Vale while the social costs will be met by Leighton Linslade Council tax.
As chairman of the Central Linslade Residents Association, I and the members of the Association, recognise that the area environment can not support a development of this size and nature. It must be stopped.
as a local resident for over 30 years I am totally against the scheme. It would bring disruption to the community with extra transport the roads cannot cope with, along with destroying beautiful land and wildlife.
The extra traffic around the station and Soulbury Road and A418 at peak times will bring the whole place to a stand. Hard enough to get a Drs appointment now, extra load on our resources is just too much. Whare will the sewage go,? Our drains are overloaded when it rains even now.
The Valley Farm Development is not sustainable and creates avoidable strains on the infrastructure of neighbouring Linslade specifically; traffic congestion, parking, schools and doctors surgeries. It will also avoidably spoil the beautiful views as you approach this historical market town.
wildlife ,Greenberg
wildlife ,Greenberg
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach 250 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via .
Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Signing with Google or Facebook verifies your signature instantly — no email needed.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Scan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
50 houses would be stretching what could reasonably be considered sustainable: 300 houses is merely a cynical proposal with complete disregard for the quality of life amongst existing and proposed new residents.