The local planning committee has officially rejected the Broompark development proposal. This outcome protects the separation between our communities and restores peace to the area. Please remain vigilant as we monitor the council for any future attempts to revive this project.
We the undersigned, object to the 660 house development proposed for Broompark or any other major development at Broompark that 'joins' East Calder and Mid Calder
The petition has now reached 500 signatures. This milestone confirms that the community remains united against the proposed Broompark development.
Reached 500 supporters
October 2, 2019
Reached 100 supporters
June 5, 2018
235 Comments
S
Siobhan Herkes
8 years ago
Featured
At the current rate of building there will be no greenbelt left. What provision is being made for the roads to be able to cope with extra traffic. A71 cannot cope already. Leave villages as villages. People move out here for the greenery and to get out of towns.
K
Katrina Bathgate
8 years ago
Featured
Schools, Doctor's Surgery and roads in and out of village are still the same as they were 32 years ago when we moved to the village. Building more houses has to stop! The current infrastructure cannot support the massive influx of residents and traffic which will follow.
N
Nicola McConnell
8 years ago
Featured
East Calder / Mid Calder roads cannot cope with more traffic. A71 cannot cope now and will not with even more traffic. East Calder Medical Practice cannot handle more patients. What about the family of deer I see every morning. No more house should be built..
F
Fiona Martin
8 years ago
Featured
Major concerns surrounding this development including lack of infrastructure to support it, is the ground actually safe to build on seeingvas part of it has mining shafts underneath it , it also contravenes policy in relation to not joining villages together
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
Featured
Before we have any new houses let’s sort out schools, doctors surgery, roads. Can the sewage works even cope with these new proposed houses? Not even considering the loss of more green spaces, the buffer between East & Mid Calder and the upset to local wildlife.
C
Chris Mallon
8 years ago
Featured
We've not got the amenities to support this many houses in East Calder. There's already Calderwood, Seven Wells and Almondell in the area with no additional services so how can the area cope with another development of this size?
D
David Todd
5 years ago
We are in danger of merging into one mass housing estate. We need to keep the village identity.......
S
Sue Hill
5 years ago
This area is an important corridor for wildlife notably badgers. We simply do not have the infasrtructure for yet MOREhouses.
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Copy link or share directly
Instagram
QR Code
The local planning committee has officially rejected the Broompark development proposal. This outcome protects the separation between our communities and restores peace to the area. Please remain vigilant as we monitor the council for any future attempts to revive this project.
We the undersigned, object to the 660 house development proposed for Broompark or any other major development at Broompark that 'joins' East Calder and Mid Calder
The petition has now reached 500 signatures. This milestone confirms that the community remains united against the proposed Broompark development.
Reached 500 supporters
October 2, 2019
Reached 100 supporters
June 5, 2018
235 Comments
S
Siobhan Herkes
8 years ago
Featured
At the current rate of building there will be no greenbelt left. What provision is being made for the roads to be able to cope with extra traffic. A71 cannot cope already. Leave villages as villages. People move out here for the greenery and to get out of towns.
K
Katrina Bathgate
8 years ago
Featured
Schools, Doctor's Surgery and roads in and out of village are still the same as they were 32 years ago when we moved to the village. Building more houses has to stop! The current infrastructure cannot support the massive influx of residents and traffic which will follow.
N
Nicola McConnell
8 years ago
Featured
East Calder / Mid Calder roads cannot cope with more traffic. A71 cannot cope now and will not with even more traffic. East Calder Medical Practice cannot handle more patients. What about the family of deer I see every morning. No more house should be built..
F
Fiona Martin
8 years ago
Featured
Major concerns surrounding this development including lack of infrastructure to support it, is the ground actually safe to build on seeingvas part of it has mining shafts underneath it , it also contravenes policy in relation to not joining villages together
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
Featured
Before we have any new houses let’s sort out schools, doctors surgery, roads. Can the sewage works even cope with these new proposed houses? Not even considering the loss of more green spaces, the buffer between East & Mid Calder and the upset to local wildlife.
C
Chris Mallon
8 years ago
Featured
We've not got the amenities to support this many houses in East Calder. There's already Calderwood, Seven Wells and Almondell in the area with no additional services so how can the area cope with another development of this size?
D
David Todd
5 years ago
We are in danger of merging into one mass housing estate. We need to keep the village identity.......
S
Sue Hill
5 years ago
This area is an important corridor for wildlife notably badgers. We simply do not have the infasrtructure for yet MOREhouses.
At the current rate of building there will be no greenbelt left. What provision is being made for the roads to be able to cope with extra traffic. A71 cannot cope already. Leave villages as villages. People move out here for the greenery and to get out of towns.