Dear RRC Residents, as per our community WhatsApp communications, please include your vote to reject the offer to extend the RRC.
Updates
January 27, 2021
I have been hearing from so many neighbors who are worried about how this extension changes the character of our streets. Your messages about the long-term impact on our families are the reason I keep pushing back against this proposal.
January 27, 2021
Seeing this level of unity among our neighbors proves that we refuse to let our community be changed without a say. This momentum shows that the people living here care deeply about our home and our future.
Reached 100 supporters
January 27, 2021
103 Comments
Too much congestion on Gary Increased risk to security in adding another gate No real obligation on the developers or body corporate to follow through on their promise putting the increased burden of management and payments on the RRC community
Vote No due to increased security risk and the safety of the children walking, playing and riding their biks in the streets.
No to including Tyto development into the RRC enclosure. Their inclusion offers no benefit to the RRC community, only cost. The and lower contribution means they won’t even cover the additional cost they causing the enclosure to incur, especially if additional entrance is required. Good for Tyto, not good for residents, more cost, more risk, more congestion. No from 22 River Road
NO to extend RRC. Wessels road turning into Gary absolutely can't support more vehicles queuing in the evenings. The extra contributions won't cover the extra need for road maintenance and protection services. We would certainly need an extra manned access point to handle the increased traffic and even at full contributions that would be tough to manage.
No from 58B Bevan Road - the current road closure residents receive no benefit from including additional complexes and bear all the responsibilities for payment of infrastructure as new body corporates are not legally bound by what developers say they will do. So it really doesn’t matter what the developer offer is, it has no value in the future when the complex is handed over to the body corporate.
555
555
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Copy link or share directly
Dear RRC Residents, as per our community WhatsApp communications, please include your vote to reject the offer to extend the RRC.
Updates
January 27, 2021
I have been hearing from so many neighbors who are worried about how this extension changes the character of our streets. Your messages about the long-term impact on our families are the reason I keep pushing back against this proposal.
January 27, 2021
Seeing this level of unity among our neighbors proves that we refuse to let our community be changed without a say. This momentum shows that the people living here care deeply about our home and our future.
Reached 100 supporters
January 27, 2021
103 Comments
Vote not to include Beside the reasons stated : Once you start changing the status quo the Municipality could impose further restrictions. The developer just wants to sell. The development corner 12 and wessel has guard’s If we do accept won’t it be difficult to object to 20 story developments within our closure ?
Too much congestion on Gary Increased risk to security in adding another gate No real obligation on the developers or body corporate to follow through on their promise putting the increased burden of management and payments on the RRC community
Vote No due to increased security risk and the safety of the children walking, playing and riding their biks in the streets.
No to including Tyto development into the RRC enclosure. Their inclusion offers no benefit to the RRC community, only cost. The and lower contribution means they won’t even cover the additional cost they causing the enclosure to incur, especially if additional entrance is required. Good for Tyto, not good for residents, more cost, more risk, more congestion. No from 22 River Road
NO to extend RRC. Wessels road turning into Gary absolutely can't support more vehicles queuing in the evenings. The extra contributions won't cover the extra need for road maintenance and protection services. We would certainly need an extra manned access point to handle the increased traffic and even at full contributions that would be tough to manage.
No from 58B Bevan Road - the current road closure residents receive no benefit from including additional complexes and bear all the responsibilities for payment of infrastructure as new body corporates are not legally bound by what developers say they will do. So it really doesn’t matter what the developer offer is, it has no value in the future when the complex is handed over to the body corporate.
555
555
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach 250 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via .
Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Signing with Google or Facebook verifies your signature instantly — no email needed.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Scan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
Vote not to include Beside the reasons stated : Once you start changing the status quo the Municipality could impose further restrictions. The developer just wants to sell. The development corner 12 and wessel has guard’s If we do accept won’t it be difficult to object to 20 story developments within our closure ?