Skip to main content

the council just confirmed they are dropping the plans for chestnut drive so the field is safe for now. i cant believe we actually pulled this off but thank you for sticking with me on this one. lets keep an eye on things just in case they get any more …

January 19, 2015

Stop the development of land to the North of Chestnut Drive, Claverham.

Stop the development of land to the North of Chestnut Drive, Claverham.

🏆 Won — 137 supporters Verified

Final supporters

A
Andy C.
S
Someone
G
Gary B.
P
Pauline L.
B
BOB P.
Z
Zita G.
P
Pat K.
S
Someone
D
Dene G.
V
Victoria g.
+127 more
ST
Started by Samantha Timms 11 years, 10 months ago

The impact that 100+ houses would have on Claverham both in the community and environmentally is unthinkable.

The field where the proposed housing development is, floods every year. Where would all this water go?

The local schools from what I understand are full or near full.

The GP services are also struggling with the numbers they have. This is reflected in the fact that you can't get a routine appointment for your own GP for nearly two weeks.

Chestnut Drive is in a terrible state and is awaiting repair. Its been like this for two years since the last snow.

A proposal of 100+ houses would change the entire dynamic or our community and have a huge impact on the infrastructure of your village.

Do you want this to change? No?, then please sign. Thanks for your support.

Updates

November 21, 2014

im still getting messages from neighbors about the state of chestnut drive and the flooding issues on the field. it is honestly so frustrating to see how little our local services can handle right now. we are keeping the pressure on the council because they need to understand that this development definitely isnt the right move for us.

November 21, 2014

im honestly amazed by how many people joined this effort so quickly. it really shows that our community sees the same problems with the chestnut drive plans that i do.

Reached 100 supporters

November 21, 2014

67 Comments

H
helen burnett
11 years ago Featured

the destruction of wildlife habitat would be unacceptable and there is a risk of increased flooding which is already a problem on the proposed site. the access roads will not be able to cope with the increased vehicle volume r

A
Annabel Durie
11 years ago Featured

The infrastructure, (GP's, Schooling, Road network) is already passed capacity and the water and sewerage is completely overflowing, a completely and utterly unsuitable area, which would cause dangerous situations for children and others alike with this sort of increase trying to use roads and services.

B
Becky Barnes
11 years ago Featured

100 new houses will put pressure on our local schools, the GP's surgery and the local environment. These factors have been totally ignored by the developers. Please stop these people from ruining our locality to line their own pockets.

J
Jackie Blake
11 years ago Featured

The fields are completely unsuitable for development as they are wet most of the year and often flood. They are also a green space in the middle of the village, which are used by many locals as part of the local walks.The infrastructure would be unable to cope with such a large increase in population.

S
Sal Pearson
11 years ago Featured

Such an impact on the village can't be good particularly if the infrastructure isn't there to support the added numbers of people, cars services and so on. Also, as a conservationist beekeeper I find the destruction of hedgerows, trees & wild flowers in the field some thing of a blow for insects.

R
Ralph James
11 years ago Featured

The only acces to this field is by very narrow lanes with dangerous bends and no pavements but lined with houses. The previous owners tried for years to have this field re-designated but were always turned down by NSC. The situation has not improved. Rather, traffic is now worse.

A
Andy Clark
10 years ago

Country villages like Claverham should not be spoiled by fast buck seeking developments. This field floods easily.

C
Clair Symes
11 years ago

This is ridiculous, why this is even being discussed is beyond me!