Skip to main content

Status: Closed — this petition is no longer accepting signatures.

Send  Village Opposing Greenbelt Development

Send Village Opposing Greenbelt Development

Closed — 75 supporters Verified

Final supporters

A
adam h.
L
Laura w.
D
Damon M.
D
Donald G.
L
L Y.
C
Claire Y.
K
Kyle S.
C
Claire Y.
H
Helen C.
R
Richard S.
+65 more
Started by Anonymous 12 years, 8 months ago

Send Parish Council has published a document in which they state that they will NOT oppose the possibility of Greenbelt development in our village.

If we stand back and allow this plan to proceed, we may be looking at over 2000 new homes in the villages of Send and Send Marsh in the foreseeable future.

Please get your individual letters of objection in to Guildford Borough Council without delay – This may be your last opportunity to stand up against the destruction of this rural community.

· It will result in urban sprawl which is precisely what establishment of the Green Belt was designed to protect

· There is insufficient infrastructure to support such development

· Local schools are at capacity now

· Roads are at a standstill at peak times already and large scale building will add hundreds more vehicles

· The villages of Send, Send Marsh, Burnt Common will completely lose their identities.

Please make you views on this important matter known to those currently in control of the future of this area by getting individual letters off to Guildford Borough Council now.

Also, please sign our petition which will be taken to the heart of local government and possibly beyond.

Please also look out for notice of an extraordinary general meeting of Send Parish Council and please attend it and support fellow villagers in their determination to keep our communities as they are.

39 Comments

P
Patrick Sheard
12 years ago Featured

Any redevelopment in Surrey should be concentrated on if not restricted to 'brown-field' sites which approach has resulted in an average of 322 new homes per year for the last 15 years. There is no reason why this should not continue, but this has been largely overlooked by Guildford Borough Council and their consultants.

R
Royston Adamson-Green
12 years ago Featured

We we moved to Send Marsh, we actively sought a property which had been built on a brownfield site. As passionate advocates of the Green Belt remaining as such and for the purpose it was intended, we wholly oppose the proposed development as described in the Local Plan.

A
Anonymous
12 years ago Featured

I believe that the proposals would be deterimental to the area whose infrastructure is already at capacity with roads needing regular reinstatement wihtout increased traffic volumes. In addition, additional development in a flood risk area creates additional threats to the local community.

D
Dr Alastair Bint
12 years ago Featured

I am concerned about the lack of infrastructure to accomodate such a huge proposed development. I am also concerned that merging a distinct rural area such as Send and Send Marsh with guildford (which is effectively what this plan proposes) is simply bad planning and bad judgement and is against our basic rights to have a peaceful quality of life.

C
chris brown
12 years ago Featured

I've lived in Send and Send Marsh for over 40 years. It's a beautiful place to live and if we build loads of new houses and increase the number of people living here we will lose all the green belt and the open spaces we all enjoy so much. Once its gone its gone. We will NEVER get it back. What a terrible legacy to leave our children and the next generation.

M
Mrs S A Renaud
12 years ago Featured

There has to be space for nature, we are lucky to enjoy snakes, deer, badgers, bats,frogs and all manner of birds and insects in our corner of Surrey, if you continue to flatten the trees and build on all the green land where will the wildlife go? No to the Plan I say.

C
Claire Yates
12 years ago

Keep send village in the greenbelt, development should be on brown field sites

M
Mark Rankin
12 years ago

Do not release greenbelt but build in more sustainable locations on the edges of towns, not rural villages.

Share Petition

Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact

Copy link or share directly

Instagram
QR Code