Judge Jean Boyd clearly has her own style of the administration justice for the poor, non-wealthy and unprivileged that appear in her court when compared to the privileged and wealthy that appear in her court as some type of cohort affinity toward the wealthy. This fact is attested to by just one of the following several past illustrations of the Judge Jean Boyd have privileged justice application.
For example, when a 14- year- old teenage boy who just happened to be person of color person from a poor family was involved in physical altercation in which the other person died and appeared in Judge Jean Boyd’s court, this 14- year-old was sentenced to 10 years by Judge Jean Boyd in her form of fair justice.
However, when Ethan Couch the 16-year-old product of wealthy Texas family that looks like the Judge’s own family who committed a host of crimes that lead up to the killing of four innocent people driving at extremely high speeds while under the influence of alcohol in the amount of three times the state’s legal limit, Judge Jean Boyd administered her brand of privileged justice by only assigning 10 years of probation to Ethan Couch. Justice may be blind, but apparently not so in Judge Jean Boyd court in her privileged justice application were the wealthy and privileged defendants are treated differently.
Removing Judge Jean Boyd from the bench will not bring back the innocent people who lost their lives at the hands Ethan Couch’s in a legal system plagued by privileged justice, silver spoon defenses and Juris Purdence corruption, but it will send a message that no one is above the law included judges that give slaps on the hands rich and wealthy criminals or believe that they are above being removed from the bench for the disparate administration of privileged justice in the legal system that has come home to roust in the Tarrant County Juvenile Justice system.
Read more about Privileged Justice and The Silver Spoon Defense available to the wealthy at http://drronaldhodges.blogspot.com/2013/12/the-silver-spoon-defense-affluenza.html and http://drronaldhodges.blogspot.com/search/label/Privileged%20Justice
Updates
December 15, 2013
The disparity in these rulings haunts me every single day. I have been spending my time documenting these patterns to present them to the oversight committee because the lives lost deserve real accountability. Thank you for keeping this conversation alive while I prepare the next steps.
December 15, 2013
Seeing this level of support confirms that so many of you see the same deep inequality in our courtrooms that I see. The momentum behind this movement proves that people are no longer willing to accept justice for the few instead of justice for all.
Reached 100 supporters
December 15, 2013
79 Comments
Four human beings are dead because of Ethan Couch. What would Jean Boyd do if one of those four people was her loved one?
Commom sense tells you that this Judge needs removed from the bench. I have been in law enforcement for over twenty years and I find this Judges decision a disgrace to justice!!!
This Judge should be sent to jail for her part in this she is guilty of defending the rich . The womn that stole christmas lights and other things got 70 years in jail . But a kid kills 4 people and gets 10 years probation . All this is saying is its ok to kill people but god help you if you stael christmas lights or a weed eater what is going on in this world we live in now .
This judge is clearly part of the problem of "Affluenza", not part of the solution of justice for all!!
How is it that a 14 year old African American teen gets 10 years for taking one life and this spoiled brat kills four and get one year in a private luxury rehab center for killing four people? This judge needs to go!!
sick judge should be tried for treason!
Who supervise the judges and make sure that he or she is doing his or her job according to the law. The answer to this question is no one judges have no one to answer to when it concerns cases. I am surprised that judges accounts are not monitored because of bribes. I think that going to a spa for 450,000 dollars a year, and getting a 10 year probation does not even compare to killing four innocent people. I wonder had one of these individual's had been part of her family would she have given the same verdict NO she would be outraged and disgusted.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Copy link or share directly
Judge Jean Boyd clearly has her own style of the administration justice for the poor, non-wealthy and unprivileged that appear in her court when compared to the privileged and wealthy that appear in her court as some type of cohort affinity toward the wealthy. This fact is attested to by just one of the following several past illustrations of the Judge Jean Boyd have privileged justice application.
For example, when a 14- year- old teenage boy who just happened to be person of color person from a poor family was involved in physical altercation in which the other person died and appeared in Judge Jean Boyd’s court, this 14- year-old was sentenced to 10 years by Judge Jean Boyd in her form of fair justice.
However, when Ethan Couch the 16-year-old product of wealthy Texas family that looks like the Judge’s own family who committed a host of crimes that lead up to the killing of four innocent people driving at extremely high speeds while under the influence of alcohol in the amount of three times the state’s legal limit, Judge Jean Boyd administered her brand of privileged justice by only assigning 10 years of probation to Ethan Couch. Justice may be blind, but apparently not so in Judge Jean Boyd court in her privileged justice application were the wealthy and privileged defendants are treated differently.
Removing Judge Jean Boyd from the bench will not bring back the innocent people who lost their lives at the hands Ethan Couch’s in a legal system plagued by privileged justice, silver spoon defenses and Juris Purdence corruption, but it will send a message that no one is above the law included judges that give slaps on the hands rich and wealthy criminals or believe that they are above being removed from the bench for the disparate administration of privileged justice in the legal system that has come home to roust in the Tarrant County Juvenile Justice system.
Read more about Privileged Justice and The Silver Spoon Defense available to the wealthy at http://drronaldhodges.blogspot.com/2013/12/the-silver-spoon-defense-affluenza.html and http://drronaldhodges.blogspot.com/search/label/Privileged%20Justice
Updates
December 15, 2013
The disparity in these rulings haunts me every single day. I have been spending my time documenting these patterns to present them to the oversight committee because the lives lost deserve real accountability. Thank you for keeping this conversation alive while I prepare the next steps.
December 15, 2013
Seeing this level of support confirms that so many of you see the same deep inequality in our courtrooms that I see. The momentum behind this movement proves that people are no longer willing to accept justice for the few instead of justice for all.
Reached 100 supporters
December 15, 2013
79 Comments
I believe the description of this petition while good in the core of its spirit is wrong to portray the 14 year old "boy" who committed the other crime as some sort of misunderstood poor angel. The correct logic should be that both should have been adequately punished and not that both should not have been punished.
Four human beings are dead because of Ethan Couch. What would Jean Boyd do if one of those four people was her loved one?
Commom sense tells you that this Judge needs removed from the bench. I have been in law enforcement for over twenty years and I find this Judges decision a disgrace to justice!!!
This Judge should be sent to jail for her part in this she is guilty of defending the rich . The womn that stole christmas lights and other things got 70 years in jail . But a kid kills 4 people and gets 10 years probation . All this is saying is its ok to kill people but god help you if you stael christmas lights or a weed eater what is going on in this world we live in now .
This judge is clearly part of the problem of "Affluenza", not part of the solution of justice for all!!
How is it that a 14 year old African American teen gets 10 years for taking one life and this spoiled brat kills four and get one year in a private luxury rehab center for killing four people? This judge needs to go!!
sick judge should be tried for treason!
Who supervise the judges and make sure that he or she is doing his or her job according to the law. The answer to this question is no one judges have no one to answer to when it concerns cases. I am surprised that judges accounts are not monitored because of bribes. I think that going to a spa for 450,000 dollars a year, and getting a 10 year probation does not even compare to killing four innocent people. I wonder had one of these individual's had been part of her family would she have given the same verdict NO she would be outraged and disgusted.
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach 250 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via .
Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Signing with Google or Facebook verifies your signature instantly — no email needed.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Scan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
I believe the description of this petition while good in the core of its spirit is wrong to portray the 14 year old "boy" who committed the other crime as some sort of misunderstood poor angel. The correct logic should be that both should have been adequately punished and not that both should not have been punished.