Skip to main content
Reevaluate EEOC Dismissals of Vaccine Religious Accommodation Cases Under the Groff v. DeJoy Standard

Reevaluate EEOC Dismissals of Vaccine Religious Accommodation Cases Under the Groff v. DeJoy Standard

38 signatures 12 to reach 50
T
Tara B. signed
S
Scott signed
B
Beth D. signed
K
Kyle R. signed
L
Lorraine P. signed
M
Matt A. signed
J
Jeff R. signed
S
Someone signed
S
Spencer H. signed
S
Someone signed
LC
Started by Lucas Chavez 1 year, 6 months ago

We, the undersigned, are calling for action to address the wrongful dismissal of religious accommodation cases by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) under an outdated interpretation of "undue hardship."

Context:

  • The Supreme Court's unanimous decision in Groff v. DeJoy has clarified what was always intended under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964: that "undue hardship" must be substantial in the overall context of an employer's business, not merely any minor inconvenience or cost. This decision has restored the original understanding of the law.
  • On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump appointed Commissioner Andrea R. Lucas as the Acting Chair of the EEOC, which could mark a significant shift in how the commission might interpret and apply civil rights laws, particularly those concerning religious freedom.

Our Concerns:

  • Numerous cases involving religious accommodations were dismissed by the EEOC when employers argued that even slight costs or disruptions constituted an "undue hardship" under the misinterpreted "de minimis" standard. Under the clarified Groff standard, these dismissals appear unjustified.
  • This has left many employees without the protections they are entitled to under the law, impacting their ability to practice their faith in the workplace.

We Request:

  1. Reevaluation of Dismissed Cases: The EEOC, under its new leadership, should review all cases dismissed based on the incorrect "de minimis" interpretation of undue hardship. These cases should be reassessed in light of the Groff v. DeJoy clarification to ensure adherence to the law's original intent.
  2. Advocacy and Support: We urge legal and advocacy groups, particularly the Pacific Justice Institute, to assist affected individuals in reopening these cases or advocating for their rights under the clarified standard.
  3. Education on Rights: The EEOC and advocacy groups should work together to educate employees about their rights under the now clarified standard, promoting awareness and understanding of how to seek religious accommodations without fear of unjust dismissal.

Why This Matters:

  • Upholding religious freedoms is fundamental to our civil liberties.
  • Correctly applying the law ensures fairness in the workplace, supporting both religious freedom and workplace efficiency.

Join Us: By signing this petition, you stand with MERFERG.org and countless others who seek justice for their religious practices in the workplace. Let's ensure that the EEOC under Commissioner Lucas's leadership returns to and upholds the true intent of civil rights protections.

Updates

January 29, 2025

Seeing this momentum grow is exhausting but necessary given how much is at stake for those sidelined by outdated standards. It is clear that we are not the only ones who refuse to accept these dismissals as the final word. There is still a long path ahead before we get the accountability we are fighting for.

9 Comments

W
Whitney Elliott
1 year ago Featured

Yes I would certainly like my case reviewed. I feel like my case was dismissed without merit.

R
Rob Nord
1 year ago Featured

I was put on leave without pay because I wouldn't get the covid shot. MERF has all my documentation.

A
Anonymous
1 year ago Featured

Personally impacted by EEOC / IHRC position and subject to mandates imposed by private company Micron Technology

L
Lorraine Phillips
1 year ago

Freedom for religion of choice and respect for individual choices to choose the God, who created all things, and of the truth

A
Anonymous
1 year ago

I wasn't dismissed, but I stand with those who were unjustly dismissed.

L
Leslie Weber
1 year ago

Count me in.

A
Anonymous
1 year ago

Yes, please re-evaluate these dismissed cases.

Z
Zach Johnson
1 year ago

[email protected]

Help this petition grow

Share it with friends to help reach 50 signatures.

Sign Petition

We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.

or sign with Email

Add a comment?

Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.

By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Share Petition

Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact

Copy link or share directly

Instagram
QR Code