Skip to main content
Petition against SCAS mealbreak “trial”

Petition against SCAS mealbreak “trial”

277 signatures 223 to reach 500
J
Jon C. signed
G
Graham signed
M
Michael S. signed
B
Bethany T. signed
K
Kelly s. signed
S
Someone signed
C
Chris signed
S
Someone signed
L
Lee S. signed
S
Someone signed
CC
Started by Concerned Concerned 9 months ago

**Please use your full name when signing and share among your SCAS contacts. Using false names undermines the petition and they will be remove**

Staff Statement on SCAS Meal Break Trial

SCAS has announced a trial whereby staff can be required to take their meal breaks away from base. Under current practice, this is optional.

This change was introduced without consultation or discussion with staff, and we wish to make clear that the unions do not speak for us in this matter.

We believe the proposed trial — if a six-month change of practice coinciding with winter pressures can truly be considered a “trial” — will have several negative effects on staff, including:

  • Disproportionate impact on remote stations: Staff at stations located further from hospitals are already more likely to experience late finishes. This issue may be worsened if crews are required to take breaks away from base, as this could increase the likelihood of being deployed further from their home station.
  • Damage to wellbeing: Staff will be forced to rely on potentially unhealthy “fast food” options, with no provision for appropriate food storage.
  • Loss of team cohesion: Taking breaks away from base reduces opportunities for staff to see familiar colleagues, share informal debriefs, and maintain the sense of team support that is vital to wellbeing.
  • Reduced quality of rest: Breaks taken at unfamiliar or less comfortable locations make it harder for staff to disengage fully, access their possessions, or enjoy a genuine period of rest and recovery.

We, the undersigned, strongly oppose this change. We believe it poses a significant risk to staff welfare and wellbeing.

We reject any assertion that we have been consulted on or have agreed to this change, and we do not feel that the unions have represented our interests in this matter.

Updates

Reached 250 supporters

November 25, 2025

Reached 100 supporters

November 2, 2025

47 Comments

S
Samantha Bambury
8 months ago Featured

My welfare and my break I want to be on my own station with people I know And where my food is kept Not go to another station and feel ignored and not know where anything is

T
Toby Jaques
8 months ago Featured

This is the most ridiculous idea. This risks staff welfare by poor food storage conditions, and not everyone can afford to buy meal deals etc on the move and the idea that we can use vending machines and pot noodles etc what sort of health promotion is that. Disgusting and shows how little SCAS care about staff

I
Isobelle Jones
8 months ago Featured

This also affects students on placement, not receiving the money that full time employed paramedics are received leaves us paying out of pocket for our food. This is an extra expense and cost that could be avoided by us being able to bring in food

M
Mrs Michelle L Robinson
8 months ago Featured

Aside from this being detrimental to already low morale, this policy will also dictate eating habits. Many people prepare food for the fridge. Not being able to keep food cold will mean changing what we can eat and will affect those with dietary restrictions especially.

C
Chrissy Ames
8 months ago Featured

Whilst not adverse to a MB AfB, I wish for it to be my choice to do so! The lack of provision for safe and respectable storage of food has not been addressed despite multiple vehicle updates.

C
Catherine Edwards
8 months ago Featured

This isn’t being put into place as a welfare issue for crews, this is a money saving scheme that will see more crews finishing late every shift as they’re out of area or miles from base!

A
Anonymous
8 months ago

This also adversely impacts Neurodisabled members of staff.

L
Lee Stafford
8 months ago

This policy does not do what it is intended and in fact can be evidenced to put staff and patients at risk, in addition breaches the protected characteristics under the equality act 2010

Help this petition grow

Share it with friends to help reach 500 signatures.

Sign Petition

We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.

or sign with Email

Add a comment?

Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.

By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Share Petition

Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact

Copy link or share directly

Instagram
QR Code