PETITION TO IMPROVE FAIRNESS, TRANSPARENCY, AND PLANNING IN THE LEARNER’S PREMIER LEAGUE (LPL)
We, the undersigned students and participants of the Learner’s Premier League (LPL), respectfully submit this petition to express our collective concern regarding several issues observed during the current edition of LPL.
LPL is meant to be a platform that encourages learning, innovation, teamwork, and healthy competition. However, the experience of many participants has raised serious questions about the fairness, transparency, and organisation of the process.
The following concerns were commonly experienced:
1. Lack of transparency in evaluation criteria
Many participants were unaware of the exact weightage and parameters used to decide the final rankings and top 5 selection. Teams that performed consistently well throughout the journey were not reflected in the final results, causing confusion and disappointment.
2. Last-minute communication and reporting
Important information such as report formats, submission deadlines, and instructions for final presentations were often conveyed at the last moment. This created unnecessary stress and reduced the quality of genuine effort and preparation.
3. Unclear and inconsistent scheduling of presentations
Presentation schedules were communicated late or changed suddenly in certain cases, leaving teams unprepared and at a disadvantage despite their hard work.
4. Visible mismatch between consistent performance and final results
Teams that ranked highly during mid-evaluations and displayed strong dedication throughout the LPL journey were not acknowledged in the final selections, raising concerns about inconsistency and fairness.
We do not raise these concerns out of resentment, but out of a genuine desire to see LPL grow into a truly fair, transparent, and inspiring platform for future batches.
Through this petition, we humbly request that for upcoming editions of LPL, the leadership and organising committee ensure:
• Clear and transparent evaluation criteria shared in advance
• Timely communication of all deadlines, instructions, and schedules
• A consistent and merit-based selection process
• Fair consideration of continuous performance, not just final appearances
• Better planning and organisation to maintain the credibility of the platform
We strongly believe that implementing these improvements will enhance trust, motivation, and participation in future editions of the Learner’s Premier League.
24 Comments
total lack of transparency. felt like the criteria changed halfway through the event just to suit certain people.
we worked so hard but the goalposts kept moving. very disappointed with how this was handled.
not cool. team 7 definitely deserved to be there.
The scheduling was a total mess and nobody knew what the judges actually wanted. Fix this for next time.
I hope future LPL will be fair and manageable , with all the parameters mention from before.
I support
I want to sign
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Copy link or share directly
PETITION TO IMPROVE FAIRNESS, TRANSPARENCY, AND PLANNING IN THE LEARNER’S PREMIER LEAGUE (LPL)
We, the undersigned students and participants of the Learner’s Premier League (LPL), respectfully submit this petition to express our collective concern regarding several issues observed during the current edition of LPL.
LPL is meant to be a platform that encourages learning, innovation, teamwork, and healthy competition. However, the experience of many participants has raised serious questions about the fairness, transparency, and organisation of the process.
The following concerns were commonly experienced:
1. Lack of transparency in evaluation criteria
Many participants were unaware of the exact weightage and parameters used to decide the final rankings and top 5 selection. Teams that performed consistently well throughout the journey were not reflected in the final results, causing confusion and disappointment.
2. Last-minute communication and reporting
Important information such as report formats, submission deadlines, and instructions for final presentations were often conveyed at the last moment. This created unnecessary stress and reduced the quality of genuine effort and preparation.
3. Unclear and inconsistent scheduling of presentations
Presentation schedules were communicated late or changed suddenly in certain cases, leaving teams unprepared and at a disadvantage despite their hard work.
4. Visible mismatch between consistent performance and final results
Teams that ranked highly during mid-evaluations and displayed strong dedication throughout the LPL journey were not acknowledged in the final selections, raising concerns about inconsistency and fairness.
We do not raise these concerns out of resentment, but out of a genuine desire to see LPL grow into a truly fair, transparent, and inspiring platform for future batches.
Through this petition, we humbly request that for upcoming editions of LPL, the leadership and organising committee ensure:
• Clear and transparent evaluation criteria shared in advance
• Timely communication of all deadlines, instructions, and schedules
• A consistent and merit-based selection process
• Fair consideration of continuous performance, not just final appearances
• Better planning and organisation to maintain the credibility of the platform
We strongly believe that implementing these improvements will enhance trust, motivation, and participation in future editions of the Learner’s Premier League.
24 Comments
We are not questioning the results, but the system that led to them. When evaluation criteria are unclear, schedules are unstable, and communication is last-minute, it becomes difficult for participants to give their best. Efforts invested over weeks deserve to be judged fairly and consistently, and every team deserves equal clarity and opportunity.
total lack of transparency. felt like the criteria changed halfway through the event just to suit certain people.
we worked so hard but the goalposts kept moving. very disappointed with how this was handled.
not cool. team 7 definitely deserved to be there.
The scheduling was a total mess and nobody knew what the judges actually wanted. Fix this for next time.
I hope future LPL will be fair and manageable , with all the parameters mention from before.
I support
I want to sign
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach 100 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via .
Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Signing with Google or Facebook verifies your signature instantly — no email needed.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Scan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
We are not questioning the results, but the system that led to them. When evaluation criteria are unclear, schedules are unstable, and communication is last-minute, it becomes difficult for participants to give their best. Efforts invested over weeks deserve to be judged fairly and consistently, and every team deserves equal clarity and opportunity.