It takes the liberty asking us to pay to park in front of our own homes, we are already paying extortionate amount in service charge. Absolutely ridiculous suggestion!!!

It's not fair to pay for guest parking when there is lot of free places. On the other hand I do want save our parking from unauthorised use but to charge the residents for this is not what I see as the right way Thanks 35 Richens close

No formal consultation was done before enforce this parking control. Our visitor will not be able to visit us because of parking control which is unreasonable.

3

Thousands of forum posts from residents allowed to park in their own car park but still having tickets given to them. Take a look: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=pcm+parking+forum A good one here to have a look at when you all have time: http://forums.pepipoo.com/lofiversion/index.php/t94583.html

Update everyone, please see my email correspondence from Gideon. We should get together and see what we can do and why we were not consulted on parking controls. PCM are not a good company to deal with and they WILL cause a nightmare scenario to one of the tenants. They WILL pursue the tenant through the courts relentlessly. They try scare tactics in order to make residents, who will have a legal right to park in their own car park, pay up. Even if you have a permit you still have to pay for your visitors each and every time. What happens when you forget? What happens when you're cleaning your car and it falls off? What happens when it fades in the sun? It does and WILL happen to one of our residents. It will be OK for the directors and landlords, I am sure they have immunity to any tickets. I saw 5 cars parked illegally (claim by PCM) in my local gym. The representative went inside the gym and asked whether any of the staff owned the cars? Two of the cars were owned by staff members and they escaped punishment, guess what? The other 3 cars got tickets. Just one wheel out of the parking bay, just one minute you forget to display a permit you WILL be fined. The directors and landlords and the people who made this lazy decision to employ this company will not have to pay any of these fines so they are safe in the knowledge that nothing will happen to them. I am in the process of speaking to Mr Shukla who is my landlord. I always thought that parking was included in my rent. Surely Mr Shukla accounts for the privilege of free and gated parking when he lets his property? By denying me my right to park I think I have a fair case of claiming damages against Mr Shukla in regards to denying me my right to 'quiet enjoyment' You can all Google 'quiet enjoyment for tenants' and see if this effects you. Why should we live in fear of this parking company? Why were we never consulted on this? Why cant we park our cars for free? Mr Keren is blaming the tenants and

Dear Mr Keren, Thank you for your reply. Please see my replies below in red. Dear Ms Paul, Thank you for your e-mail, which has been read by the directors of Tudor Place Residents Association. We are sorry to hear about the distress caused by the letter received by PCM. By employing PCM to manage our car park, we are securing the best interests of the residents and landlords. They will work on our behalf to ensure that only vehicles genuinely allowed to park in Tudor Place use the car park, which includes the residents’ own guests by way of a 24-hour scratch card. The residents are in disagreement here whether our best interests are being served. So much so, that a petition of 26 names has been signed online: http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/keep-tw31pl-free Residents are also disheartened that no consultation took place on whether there was a problem or not and what the residents would want to be done as a remedy. The residents have always thought that the Association had the best interests of the residents at heart and had an obligation to consult it's residents, even if it was as a gesture of courtesy. You can see some of the comments for yourself. We can assure you that the decision has not been taken lightly. The directors have monitored the car park for well over two years and decided that the illegal usage thereof has continued for far too long. The problems we have seen comprise: local businesses using it for their staff and clients. high street shoppers tailgating residents in order to gain access. worshipers from the religious centre opposite the car showroom using the car park on evenings and at weekends. an increasing number of vehicles being abandoned and which are costly to remove. The directors have noticed, when parking on the estate, that on most occasions when doing so, there are very few spaces left in the main car park area. This contrasts sharply with only a few years

Flat 4, 664