To The Prime Minister of Australia
We the undersigned urge you to initiate the processes necessary to establish a Royal Commission to investigate the validity of the scientific hypotheses, that have been relied upon to drive the Global Warming/Climate Change hysteria. This unproven idea has been allowed to cripple our economy and reduce our standard of living. We want the scientific truth to be sensibly debated and exposed.
- We can no longer afford our energy charges and the nation's power grid is a joke with prospects to only get worse.
- We wish to see our Nation's abundant natural resources used to enrich our lives and not exported to our disadvantage.
- We are sick and tired of our taxes being used to subsidise inefficient wind and solar, while our farmers are on their knees, pleading for government support.
- We have seen our major processors and manufacturers move off-shore resulting in huge job losses and loss of GDP. Our largest aluminium smelter, Tomago, has threatened to go if it is "blacked out" this coming summer.
- We are fed up with ratbag socialist, climate activists being allowed to block our freedom of passage, preventing us from getting to work and disrupting our emergency services
- We DO NOT believe that there is a man-made "climate emergency".
NOTES
ROYAL COMMISSIONS are called to look into matters of great importance and usually, controversy. These can be matters such as government structure, the treatment of minorities, events of considerable public concern or economic questions.
HYPOTHESES (def) - assumptions for the purpose of initiating argument, debate and research; theories to explain some issue or situation that may or may not prove to be true; supposition; conjecture.
Updates
November 4, 2019
Reaching this new level of support shows that people are finally waking up to the economic damage being done to our families. It is heartening to see so many others who refuse to accept these job killing energy policies as our permanent future.
52 Comments
No one has yet explained how man can influence climate, or the benefits of carbon dioxide
The hysteria around the Climate hoax needs to be addressed especially for our children who are being indoctrinated and terrorised by those with other agendas.
97% of scientists do NOT agree there is a man-made climate crisis, and we should not spend all this money without a full enquiry.
To quantify the issue of Carbon Dioxide in the Earth’s atmosphere, here are the undisputed facts: Total CO2 in the atmosphere: 0.03846% Of this nature contributes 0.03729% Mankind contributes 0.00117% Australia supposedly contributes 0.00001748% (inconsequential to Global weather, but disastrous to our economy) The real game changer though, is that nature’s contribution fluctuates by a margin of up to 4 times the total contributed by mankind and more to the point 66.9 times that supposedly contributed by Australia.
A Royal Commission is the perfect answer to provide an objective view on the climate issue, free of politics and minority group influence/hysteria.
Surely there must be 1 person out there to have the balls to have an open royal commission into this hypotheses, and put it too rest once and for all.
We are being taken for fools.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Copy link or share directly
To The Prime Minister of Australia
We the undersigned urge you to initiate the processes necessary to establish a Royal Commission to investigate the validity of the scientific hypotheses, that have been relied upon to drive the Global Warming/Climate Change hysteria. This unproven idea has been allowed to cripple our economy and reduce our standard of living. We want the scientific truth to be sensibly debated and exposed.
- We can no longer afford our energy charges and the nation's power grid is a joke with prospects to only get worse.
- We wish to see our Nation's abundant natural resources used to enrich our lives and not exported to our disadvantage.
- We are sick and tired of our taxes being used to subsidise inefficient wind and solar, while our farmers are on their knees, pleading for government support.
- We have seen our major processors and manufacturers move off-shore resulting in huge job losses and loss of GDP. Our largest aluminium smelter, Tomago, has threatened to go if it is "blacked out" this coming summer.
- We are fed up with ratbag socialist, climate activists being allowed to block our freedom of passage, preventing us from getting to work and disrupting our emergency services
- We DO NOT believe that there is a man-made "climate emergency".
NOTES
ROYAL COMMISSIONS are called to look into matters of great importance and usually, controversy. These can be matters such as government structure, the treatment of minorities, events of considerable public concern or economic questions.
HYPOTHESES (def) - assumptions for the purpose of initiating argument, debate and research; theories to explain some issue or situation that may or may not prove to be true; supposition; conjecture.
Updates
November 4, 2019
Reaching this new level of support shows that people are finally waking up to the economic damage being done to our families. It is heartening to see so many others who refuse to accept these job killing energy policies as our permanent future.
52 Comments
Totally agree to date the arguments are biased not balanced. The view of the vast majority of Australians is not arrived at as a result of scientific knowledge but simply by the media they consume. Few if any could quote or name a scientific source let alone its author. A Royal Commission could at least demand and test verifiable evidence. The economic decisions this country takes based on CC beliefs could have catasphoric outcomes. Get the facts on the table for all to see.
No one has yet explained how man can influence climate, or the benefits of carbon dioxide
The hysteria around the Climate hoax needs to be addressed especially for our children who are being indoctrinated and terrorised by those with other agendas.
97% of scientists do NOT agree there is a man-made climate crisis, and we should not spend all this money without a full enquiry.
To quantify the issue of Carbon Dioxide in the Earth’s atmosphere, here are the undisputed facts: Total CO2 in the atmosphere: 0.03846% Of this nature contributes 0.03729% Mankind contributes 0.00117% Australia supposedly contributes 0.00001748% (inconsequential to Global weather, but disastrous to our economy) The real game changer though, is that nature’s contribution fluctuates by a margin of up to 4 times the total contributed by mankind and more to the point 66.9 times that supposedly contributed by Australia.
A Royal Commission is the perfect answer to provide an objective view on the climate issue, free of politics and minority group influence/hysteria.
Surely there must be 1 person out there to have the balls to have an open royal commission into this hypotheses, and put it too rest once and for all.
We are being taken for fools.
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach 100 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via .
Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Signing with Google or Facebook verifies your signature instantly — no email needed.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Scan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
Totally agree to date the arguments are biased not balanced. The view of the vast majority of Australians is not arrived at as a result of scientific knowledge but simply by the media they consume. Few if any could quote or name a scientific source let alone its author. A Royal Commission could at least demand and test verifiable evidence. The economic decisions this country takes based on CC beliefs could have catasphoric outcomes. Get the facts on the table for all to see.