Updates
March 8, 2025
The momentum is undeniable. This proves we are all on the same page about how we should be assessed.
Reached 100 supporters
March 8, 2025
100 Comments
If the University starts and validates the module under this open book process, they should continue with the current participants and start the closed book with a fresh Bach. For example, students who are beginning a fresh study, not current students
The exams should return to open book since it is unfair especially for the 3rd year students, who have only been used to the previous form of examinations which were open book. This change, in the most crucial year of the students was uncalled for and have placed students in a huge dilemma and confusion.
Please bring back open book exams for the good of all students. As a mature student, I have a full time job, a family to take care and other obligations as well. And the fact that it is close book exam has really taken a heavy toll on me. Please UOL reconsider. Thank you.
The last time I memorised anything was in 2021, and it wasn't even as intense as the ones that I have to manage in less than 2 months from now. The amount of autoimmune outbreaks I had to endure for this is unspeakable :(
I would like to suggest that the shift to closed-book exams should apply only to students registering in 2025 and beyond, rather than those who enrolled under the previous open-book system. This would ensure fairness and consistency in assessment for current students who prepared based on the earlier exam format.
come on man ,we all know how hard is llb and you guys still making it more difficult.UOL please have mercy on us.pls
Yes I'm in favor of it
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Copy link or share directly
Updates
March 8, 2025
The momentum is undeniable. This proves we are all on the same page about how we should be assessed.
Reached 100 supporters
March 8, 2025
100 Comments
Law’s not about cramming knowledge into your head—it’s about being able to think critically and reason through things. Even top judges hit pause in court to consult legal books. Honestly, it’s frustrating that UOL doesn’t get this basic point.
If the University starts and validates the module under this open book process, they should continue with the current participants and start the closed book with a fresh Bach. For example, students who are beginning a fresh study, not current students
The exams should return to open book since it is unfair especially for the 3rd year students, who have only been used to the previous form of examinations which were open book. This change, in the most crucial year of the students was uncalled for and have placed students in a huge dilemma and confusion.
Please bring back open book exams for the good of all students. As a mature student, I have a full time job, a family to take care and other obligations as well. And the fact that it is close book exam has really taken a heavy toll on me. Please UOL reconsider. Thank you.
The last time I memorised anything was in 2021, and it wasn't even as intense as the ones that I have to manage in less than 2 months from now. The amount of autoimmune outbreaks I had to endure for this is unspeakable :(
I would like to suggest that the shift to closed-book exams should apply only to students registering in 2025 and beyond, rather than those who enrolled under the previous open-book system. This would ensure fairness and consistency in assessment for current students who prepared based on the earlier exam format.
come on man ,we all know how hard is llb and you guys still making it more difficult.UOL please have mercy on us.pls
Yes I'm in favor of it
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach 500 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via .
Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Signing with Google or Facebook verifies your signature instantly — no email needed.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Scan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
Law’s not about cramming knowledge into your head—it’s about being able to think critically and reason through things. Even top judges hit pause in court to consult legal books. Honestly, it’s frustrating that UOL doesn’t get this basic point.