Whereas, Administrative Law Judges employed by the State of California currently in State Bargaining Unit 2 have unique job duties and perform a unique function as impartial decision makers in contested proceedings throughout State government, while other Unit 2 members serve as advocates before the courts and said Administrative Law Judges, which creates potential conflicts of interest and therefore the potential for the appearance of impropriety.
The undersigned strongly believe that because of our unique occupational community of interest, and the inherent conflict of interest within Unit 2, that we would be best served by our own distinct Bargaining Unit for the purpose of representation on all matters of employer-employee relations.
We the undersigned Judges, believe that because of our unique occupational community of interest and to resolve said conflict of interest, it is in all parties\' best interest that we create our own Bargaining Unit for purposes of collective bargaining.
We hit one hundred signatures today. It has been a long road to get even this far but seeing this level of agreement confirms that I am not the only one who sees the conflict in our current unit.
Reached 100 supporters
January 16, 2007
6 Comments
D
David Phillips
19 years ago
Featured
We need our own unit. The system is broken
K
Karen Hale
19 years ago
Featured
Seems like common sense. hope management actually listens this time and stops acting like the current setup is fine
S
Susan Meyer
19 years ago
Featured
FINALLY. This has been an issue for way too long. Glad someone is actually doing something about it.
M
Mark Ortiz
19 years ago
Featured
The conflict of interest is obvious to anyone who actually does this job. Support this 100%.
R
Robert Das
19 years ago
Featured
This is long overdue. The current structure just doesnt make any sense for our role in the legal system.
L
Linda Sanders
19 years ago
Featured
About time. How can we be expected to be impartial when we are bundled in with the people we are supposed to be judging? Fix this mess.
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach
500 signatures.
Your share link
Couldn't copy automatically. Long-press to copy:
Share directly
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
or sign with Email
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via
.
Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
By signing, you accept our Terms and Privacy Policy and agree to occasional emails about petitions. Unsubscribe anytime.
Whereas, Administrative Law Judges employed by the State of California currently in State Bargaining Unit 2 have unique job duties and perform a unique function as impartial decision makers in contested proceedings throughout State government, while other Unit 2 members serve as advocates before the courts and said Administrative Law Judges, which creates potential conflicts of interest and therefore the potential for the appearance of impropriety.
The undersigned strongly believe that because of our unique occupational community of interest, and the inherent conflict of interest within Unit 2, that we would be best served by our own distinct Bargaining Unit for the purpose of representation on all matters of employer-employee relations.
We the undersigned Judges, believe that because of our unique occupational community of interest and to resolve said conflict of interest, it is in all parties\' best interest that we create our own Bargaining Unit for purposes of collective bargaining.
We hit one hundred signatures today. It has been a long road to get even this far but seeing this level of agreement confirms that I am not the only one who sees the conflict in our current unit.
Reached 100 supporters
January 16, 2007
6 Comments
D
David Phillips
19 years ago
Featured
We need our own unit. The system is broken
K
Karen Hale
19 years ago
Featured
Seems like common sense. hope management actually listens this time and stops acting like the current setup is fine
S
Susan Meyer
19 years ago
Featured
FINALLY. This has been an issue for way too long. Glad someone is actually doing something about it.
M
Mark Ortiz
19 years ago
Featured
The conflict of interest is obvious to anyone who actually does this job. Support this 100%.
R
Robert Das
19 years ago
Featured
This is long overdue. The current structure just doesnt make any sense for our role in the legal system.
L
Linda Sanders
19 years ago
Featured
About time. How can we be expected to be impartial when we are bundled in with the people we are supposed to be judging? Fix this mess.
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach
500 signatures.
Your share link
Couldn't copy automatically. Long-press to copy:
Share directly
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
or sign with Email
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Signing with Google or Facebook verifies your signature instantly — no email needed.
By signing, you accept our Terms and Privacy Policy and agree to occasional emails about petitions. Unsubscribe anytime.
We need our own unit. The system is broken