As students, we are against the current circulated ideas of changing the form of assessment here at Macquarie University. We do not believe it is at all beneficial to our educations to have one large assessment, instead of a minimum of 3. Additionally, we do not believe or see the benefits in condensing our options for units
Distributive practice is one of the best methods to impart learning, ask the Education faculty. Spreading out smaller assessments provides better learning outcomes. One big assessment only benefits the uni's bottom line through having to pay fewer markers. Don't prove that all you care about is money.
B
bella
1 year ago
Featured
Shame on Macquarie Uni. This uni has been lacking structure and engagement since covid and has massive shortfalls for neurodiverse students. This condensing is ill informed and I will move universities if this happens.
A
Anonymous
1 year ago
Featured
Regular feedback and feed-forward increase student success and engagement. A variety of assessments also aligns with the Universal Design for Learning framework.
A
Alison Walker
1 year ago
Featured
It's impossible from a pedagogical standpoint to defend a move to change assessment structure to 1 assignment. The whole point of 'formative' tasks becomes moot. Students need the opportunity to build skills, receive feedback, and continue to develop.
F
Frank Valckenborgh
1 year ago
Featured
I understand that FoA is financially very viable. Putting students first implies also that they need to have the appropriate content background when they graduate, and fewer units and suboptimal teaching time contradicts the first assertion.
G
Grahame Grahame
1 year ago
Featured
So we're expected to go through 13 weeks and have to wait until week 15 to get any idea of how we're going? As if there isn't a lack of in-course feedback as it stands. MQ is poor enough when it comes to feedback (with two notable exceptions) so why make it even worse?
A
Anonymous
1 year ago
This is putting me off from studying at Macquarie next year.
G
Gabriel Don
1 year ago
Ridiculous change that isn't good for anybody, shows a poor understanding of education.
As students, we are against the current circulated ideas of changing the form of assessment here at Macquarie University. We do not believe it is at all beneficial to our educations to have one large assessment, instead of a minimum of 3. Additionally, we do not believe or see the benefits in condensing our options for units
Distributive practice is one of the best methods to impart learning, ask the Education faculty. Spreading out smaller assessments provides better learning outcomes. One big assessment only benefits the uni's bottom line through having to pay fewer markers. Don't prove that all you care about is money.
B
bella
1 year ago
Featured
Shame on Macquarie Uni. This uni has been lacking structure and engagement since covid and has massive shortfalls for neurodiverse students. This condensing is ill informed and I will move universities if this happens.
A
Anonymous
1 year ago
Featured
Regular feedback and feed-forward increase student success and engagement. A variety of assessments also aligns with the Universal Design for Learning framework.
A
Alison Walker
1 year ago
Featured
It's impossible from a pedagogical standpoint to defend a move to change assessment structure to 1 assignment. The whole point of 'formative' tasks becomes moot. Students need the opportunity to build skills, receive feedback, and continue to develop.
F
Frank Valckenborgh
1 year ago
Featured
I understand that FoA is financially very viable. Putting students first implies also that they need to have the appropriate content background when they graduate, and fewer units and suboptimal teaching time contradicts the first assertion.
G
Grahame Grahame
1 year ago
Featured
So we're expected to go through 13 weeks and have to wait until week 15 to get any idea of how we're going? As if there isn't a lack of in-course feedback as it stands. MQ is poor enough when it comes to feedback (with two notable exceptions) so why make it even worse?
A
Anonymous
1 year ago
This is putting me off from studying at Macquarie next year.
G
Gabriel Don
1 year ago
Ridiculous change that isn't good for anybody, shows a poor understanding of education.
Distributive practice is one of the best methods to impart learning, ask the Education faculty. Spreading out smaller assessments provides better learning outcomes. One big assessment only benefits the uni's bottom line through having to pay fewer markers. Don't prove that all you care about is money.