Petition opposing severances, laneway creation and development proposal of 14/16 Wineva
OMB hearing February 4th and 5th, 2009
Variances as requested by Daryl Jessop, developer:
By-law Requirements Zone R2 – Beaches Official Plan
GFA(Gross Floor Area) = 0.60 or 60% of lot size
Landscaped Open Space: min. 30%
Minimum set-back from front lot line: 6.0 meters
Minimum set-back from rear lot line: 7.5 meters
Minimum set-back from flanking street: 6.0 meters
Unit A West Lot Fronting Alfresco
GFA 900 sq. ft. allowed, 2076 sq. ft. proposed 139%
Landscaped Open Space proposed: 21%
Min set-back from front lot line proposed: 1.12 m
Min set-back from rear lot line proposed: 3.79 m
Minimum set-back from flanking street: n/a
Unit B Center Lot Fronting Alfresco
GFA 900 sq. ft. allowed, 2076 sq. ft. proposed 139%
Landscaped Open Space proposed: 21%
Min set-back from front lot line proposed: 1.12 m
Min set-back from rear lot line proposed: 3.79 m
Minimum set-back from flanking street: n/a
Unit C East Lot Fronting Alfresco
GFA 1200 sq. ft. allowed, 2127 sq. ft. proposed 106%
Landscaped Open Space proposed: 22%
Min set-back from front lot line proposed: 1.21 m
Min set-back from rear lot line proposed: 3.79 m
Min set-back from flanking street proposed: 1.69 m
• Proposed vehicular rights-of-way, access from Wineva between 16 and 18 Wineva (currently a walkway) would create throughway traffic off Wineva, additional traffic in rear lane, additional foot traffic, snow removal and garbage issues
• Each residential unit will be a full three storeys high with a rooftop patio, exterior rear stairway for access, thus blocking all southerly views from all windows and porches of residents north as well as east of units. Currently, there are 0 single family or semi-detached family dwellings that exceed 2 ½ stories in height within proximity of this proposal
• Each residential unit by design, size, re-orientation, green space and lot size is completely out-of-character with existing homes and does not maintain the general intent or purpose with the Official Plan or Zoning By-Law for R2 zoning
im honestly blown away by how much this has taken off. seeing so many people join in shows that we arent alone in wanting to protect our street. this momentum is proof that the neighbors are paying attention to what happens at wineva.
6 Comments
S
Sarah Lloyd
17 years ago
Featured
The beaches is already way too crowded as it is. We dont need another massive project ruining the neighborhood feel. Leave it alone.
L
Linda Bailey
17 years ago
Featured
Keep Wineva safe for the kids. Extra traffic in a residential lane is an accident waiting to happen.
M
Mike Zhang
17 years ago
Featured
139% over the limit is just ridiculous. Who approved these numbers in the first place? Greedy.
D
David Knight
17 years ago
Featured
NO! We have enough congestion. Stop trying to squeeze these huge houses on tiny lots.
T
Tom Watson
17 years ago
Featured
Way too big for the lot. Itll look completely out of place next to the other houses.
E
Elena Farah
17 years ago
Featured
Disgraceful. The developer clearly doesnt care about the people actually living here.
Share this petition
Share this petition to help it reach more people.
Your share link
Couldn't copy automatically. Long-press to copy:
Share directly
Status: Closed — this petition is no longer accepting signatures.
Petition opposing severances, laneway creation and development proposal of 14/16 Wineva
OMB hearing February 4th and 5th, 2009
Variances as requested by Daryl Jessop, developer:
By-law Requirements Zone R2 – Beaches Official Plan
GFA(Gross Floor Area) = 0.60 or 60% of lot size
Landscaped Open Space: min. 30%
Minimum set-back from front lot line: 6.0 meters
Minimum set-back from rear lot line: 7.5 meters
Minimum set-back from flanking street: 6.0 meters
Unit A West Lot Fronting Alfresco
GFA 900 sq. ft. allowed, 2076 sq. ft. proposed 139%
Landscaped Open Space proposed: 21%
Min set-back from front lot line proposed: 1.12 m
Min set-back from rear lot line proposed: 3.79 m
Minimum set-back from flanking street: n/a
Unit B Center Lot Fronting Alfresco
GFA 900 sq. ft. allowed, 2076 sq. ft. proposed 139%
Landscaped Open Space proposed: 21%
Min set-back from front lot line proposed: 1.12 m
Min set-back from rear lot line proposed: 3.79 m
Minimum set-back from flanking street: n/a
Unit C East Lot Fronting Alfresco
GFA 1200 sq. ft. allowed, 2127 sq. ft. proposed 106%
Landscaped Open Space proposed: 22%
Min set-back from front lot line proposed: 1.21 m
Min set-back from rear lot line proposed: 3.79 m
Min set-back from flanking street proposed: 1.69 m
• Proposed vehicular rights-of-way, access from Wineva between 16 and 18 Wineva (currently a walkway) would create throughway traffic off Wineva, additional traffic in rear lane, additional foot traffic, snow removal and garbage issues
• Each residential unit will be a full three storeys high with a rooftop patio, exterior rear stairway for access, thus blocking all southerly views from all windows and porches of residents north as well as east of units. Currently, there are 0 single family or semi-detached family dwellings that exceed 2 ½ stories in height within proximity of this proposal
• Each residential unit by design, size, re-orientation, green space and lot size is completely out-of-character with existing homes and does not maintain the general intent or purpose with the Official Plan or Zoning By-Law for R2 zoning
im honestly blown away by how much this has taken off. seeing so many people join in shows that we arent alone in wanting to protect our street. this momentum is proof that the neighbors are paying attention to what happens at wineva.
6 Comments
S
Sarah Lloyd
17 years ago
Featured
The beaches is already way too crowded as it is. We dont need another massive project ruining the neighborhood feel. Leave it alone.
L
Linda Bailey
17 years ago
Featured
Keep Wineva safe for the kids. Extra traffic in a residential lane is an accident waiting to happen.
M
Mike Zhang
17 years ago
Featured
139% over the limit is just ridiculous. Who approved these numbers in the first place? Greedy.
D
David Knight
17 years ago
Featured
NO! We have enough congestion. Stop trying to squeeze these huge houses on tiny lots.
T
Tom Watson
17 years ago
Featured
Way too big for the lot. Itll look completely out of place next to the other houses.
E
Elena Farah
17 years ago
Featured
Disgraceful. The developer clearly doesnt care about the people actually living here.
The beaches is already way too crowded as it is. We dont need another massive project ruining the neighborhood feel. Leave it alone.