Skip to main content
PETITION TO OPPOSE CURRENT 212 STUART STREET PLAN

PETITION TO OPPOSE CURRENT 212 STUART STREET PLAN

120 signatures 130 to reach 250
T
tim c. signed
C
cristina f. signed
J
joseph s. signed
J
Jimmy W. signed
L
LEigh D. signed
C
Carl H. signed
S
Someone signed
S
Someone signed
R
Richard B. signed
S
Someone signed
RL
Started by Robert Lashway 9 years, 6 months ago

We, the undersigned, residents of Bay Village, CITIZENS of Boston, and neighbors to the proposed development located at 212-222 STUART STREET & 17-19 SHAWMUT STREET BOSTON 02116 (the “Property”), hereby notify the Boston Planning and Development Authority (BPDA); our City and State representatives; our mayor, Martin Walsh; and both the Planning Committee and Executive Committee of the Bay Village Neighborhood Association that we are unequivocally opposed to the development proposed by Transom Real Estate, LLC, and/or the owner of the Property. Specifically, we are opposed to this new construction on the basis of a) violations of Boston City Zoning; b) violations of General Laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; and c) anticipated injury to the Bay Village Neighborhood and to the public welfare if this construction were to go forward as proposed:

  • All zoning approvals from the City (“BRA”) regarding previous proposals for this site (in 2006 and in 2008) have expired and should be considered null and void in relation to this project.
  • The project is located within the BAY VILLAGE HISTORIC DISTRICT, established under MA General Laws Ch. 40C (Historic Districts Act of 1960), which prohibits new construction which would “materially impair the historical, social, cultural, architectural, or aesthetic significance of the district.” Transom’s proposed building will denigrate the architectural integrity and historic character of the neighborhood as established by the Massachusetts legislature due to the building’s excessive height (199 feet) which is out of scale and character with this historic residential neighborhood and will disrupt the rhythm of the north to south street facades extending from the buildings on Statler Park to the 35-65 foot facades along Church Street.
  • Building Height as proposed violates zoning height restrictions in the Historic District on all 4 parcels by between 469% (164 feet), at most, and 206% (134 feet), at least. Proposed project height is unacceptable and incompatible with existing low-rise buildings in the vicinity and will destroy the intimate character of the neighborhood. Especially, the building would physically isolate and limit the light and air surrounding properties on tiny Shawmut Street.
  • Off-Street Parking Insufficient. The proposal states long-term parking leases for “up to 50 spaces” in the nearby Revere Hotel garage, for a building of 133 units. There is insufficient parking in the area to accommodate the extra cars anticipated and the overcrowding will harm the neighborhood especially during snowstorms when everyone has to move off-street.
  • Floor Area Ratio (FAR) is excessive: 1300% more than FAR zoning for this parcel. See Article 63-9 Density Limitation Regulations (Bay Village Neighborhood District). See also Map 1N, Zoning Districts of City of Boston.
  • Light pollution generated by the project will flood the neighborhood and has not been studied or addressed by the developer.
  • Blue sky will be blocked out of Bay Village. Developer’s claims that the building will only be seen by 29% of the Village are inaccurate, due to a faulty methodology. This will be a looming building seen by everyone facing north from sidewalks and windows facing north.
  • SHADOW CRITERIA. Developer has yet to provide complete data proving that proposed building satisfies Article 38-16 (Environmental Impact Standards) of the Midtown Cultural District code, requiring that no project shall cast shadows on any single Shadow Impact Area depicted on Map 1A of the Zoning Code for more than 2 hours from 8 am thru 2:30 pm on any day from March 21 thru October 21. Statler Park is a Shadow Impact Area.
  • WIND CRITERIA. Developer’s own studies already show that the 199-foot structure would increase wind in the vicinity, at times over 14.1 miles per hour during normal conditions, likely in excess of the Environmental Impact Standards established in Section 38-16 of the code for the Midtown Cultural District (“Open Plazas and Park Areas”). Wind in the vicinity of South Cove Apartments, in Statler Park, and within Bay Village itself will degrade the quality of life of Bay Village residents. See attached Wind Analysis.
  • SOUTH COVE ELDERLY APARTMENTS. During construction the project will severely limit access for the elderly residents within the Church St. Plaza as well as along Shawmut St. Once completed, per the Wind Analysis, the area outside the entrance (which includes the residents’ public space) will be negatively affected 100% of the time.
  • There are no conditions especially affecting this parcel which do not affect the zoning district in general.

In conclusion, the proposed new structure will cause substantial hardship to the community, cause detriment to the public good, and will nullify and substantially deviate from the intent and purpose of the zoning ordinance and the historic fabric of the neighborhood. We encourage and respectfully request that the the Zoning and Planning Committee and the Executive Committee of the Bay Village Neighborhood Association takes steps to stop this project as proposed by voting to oppose. Please add this document to the public record at each meeting regarding this project.

Respectfully submitted,

Updates

Reached 100 supporters

May 15, 2017

43 Comments

E
Erwan de Naurois
9 years ago Featured

The height is excessive by not being in keeping with the adjacent buildings. This new build adds no parking capacity and will add further competition for on-street parking in bay village, and unfair pressure on current residents.

A
Anonymous
9 years ago Featured

I am opposed to this project. What is the point of having zoning laws if you're going to ignore them? Quality of life has value, and this proposed new development will destroy the quality of life of the current area residents. All future generations will be denied sunlight and blue sky and will be subjected to increased wind and light pollution and noise. Please do not allow profit to be cherished more than people.

E
Esther S Messing
9 years ago Featured

In addition to the reasons outlined in this petition, I object to the proposed development because the height of the building would destroy the ambience of the neighborhood. The low-rise nature of the surrounding neighborhood is much of what gives Boston its unique, European "flavor" and adds so much to the charm of this part of the city. It would be a terrible mistake to change our neighborhood by squeezing a 19+ story building into a small, historic neighborhood.

J
Jonathan Day
9 years ago Featured

As a resident of One Charles, I support this petition. I am unequivocally opposed to the proposed development for the reasons cited in the petition. I also object to the long construction period that will be required for such a development, which will be a nuisance to local residents.

A
Anonymous
9 years ago Featured

I oppose this project 100%. I purchased property in Bay Village with the understanding there was a height variance which this project, blows out of the water, if approved.

T
Trevania Henderson
9 years ago Featured

Please extend the public comment period on 212 Stuart Street an additional 90 days. I am opposed to this project because it is located with in the Historic District and violates zoning height by 135 feet(469%). This project will destroy the historic character of Bay Village. It will set a precedent within the historic districts.

J
Jimmy Wyman
9 years ago

I oppose the proposed 199 foot tower at 212 Stuart st.

E
Erika Gorman
9 years ago

As a boston resident I strongly oppose this development- or any high rise developments in historic neighborhoods

Help this petition grow

Share it with friends to help reach 250 signatures.

Your share link

Share directly