THEY HAVE OFFICIALLY REVERSED THE WIDE BEAM LICENCE INCREASE PROPOSAL!! THIS IS A MASSIVE VICTORY FOR ALL OF US AND I AM BEYOND THRILLED THAT WE HELD THE LINE TOGETHER!! KEEP A SHARP EYE OUT JUST IN CASE THEY TRY TO SNEAK THIS BACK IN LATER ON.
Following Consultation of all Boat licence holders C&RT have concluded that owners of boats wider than 7, should pay more
This increase only affects owners of wider craft
This consultation was flawed in that owners of narrow craft should not have been consulted about an increase that did not affect them as the outcome was predictable and the conclusion unfair
We actually take up less space on our current online mooring now we have a 47ft wide beam in contrast to our previous 60ft narrow boat but will pay more and CART will also get more from the next moorer who uses the extra space.
J
Joe Bourke
8 years ago
Featured
Widebeam craft has a much restricted cruising area compared to narrow beam craft. Why wasn't that considered in the review? Why should narrow beam craft be allowed to influence a consultation in such a way that they escape without any licence cost increase?
M
Matthew Stevens
8 years ago
Featured
I find this unfair, as a wide beam cruiser based on the river Trent I have access to only around 5% of the waterways due to height but will be expected to pay more whilst narrowboats with access to 100% of the network will not.
T
Toni Girdler
8 years ago
Featured
C&RT and BWML, wholly owned by C&RT currently, are unfairly extorting unfair licence and mooring fees from widebeams many of which are on residential moorings and have been family homes for over 30 years. Targeting only widebeams is discrimination.
T
Tony Cundill
8 years ago
Featured
If CRT are charging me a premium, I should get a premium canal and this is not the case. All this will achieve is to flush more wide beam boats out of Marinas and onto the canal network as boaters seek to rebalance their budgets.
D
Denise Lawrence
8 years ago
Featured
Think it's ridiculous to charge w/beams more a lot of young couples are making them there first home and money is already tight. The next large sector to live on wide beams are retired and I think you charge us more than enough already.
K
Keith Rollin
5 years ago
How can it be right to have to pay more for only a fraction of the network. Perhaps we should get a group action going
R
Roger higginbottom
6 years ago
Not able to use all of system but pay more than narrow boat, corruption at it's best
THEY HAVE OFFICIALLY REVERSED THE WIDE BEAM LICENCE INCREASE PROPOSAL!! THIS IS A MASSIVE VICTORY FOR ALL OF US AND I AM BEYOND THRILLED THAT WE HELD THE LINE TOGETHER!! KEEP A SHARP EYE OUT JUST IN CASE THEY TRY TO SNEAK THIS BACK IN LATER ON.
Following Consultation of all Boat licence holders C&RT have concluded that owners of boats wider than 7, should pay more
This increase only affects owners of wider craft
This consultation was flawed in that owners of narrow craft should not have been consulted about an increase that did not affect them as the outcome was predictable and the conclusion unfair
We actually take up less space on our current online mooring now we have a 47ft wide beam in contrast to our previous 60ft narrow boat but will pay more and CART will also get more from the next moorer who uses the extra space.
J
Joe Bourke
8 years ago
Featured
Widebeam craft has a much restricted cruising area compared to narrow beam craft. Why wasn't that considered in the review? Why should narrow beam craft be allowed to influence a consultation in such a way that they escape without any licence cost increase?
M
Matthew Stevens
8 years ago
Featured
I find this unfair, as a wide beam cruiser based on the river Trent I have access to only around 5% of the waterways due to height but will be expected to pay more whilst narrowboats with access to 100% of the network will not.
T
Toni Girdler
8 years ago
Featured
C&RT and BWML, wholly owned by C&RT currently, are unfairly extorting unfair licence and mooring fees from widebeams many of which are on residential moorings and have been family homes for over 30 years. Targeting only widebeams is discrimination.
T
Tony Cundill
8 years ago
Featured
If CRT are charging me a premium, I should get a premium canal and this is not the case. All this will achieve is to flush more wide beam boats out of Marinas and onto the canal network as boaters seek to rebalance their budgets.
D
Denise Lawrence
8 years ago
Featured
Think it's ridiculous to charge w/beams more a lot of young couples are making them there first home and money is already tight. The next large sector to live on wide beams are retired and I think you charge us more than enough already.
K
Keith Rollin
5 years ago
How can it be right to have to pay more for only a fraction of the network. Perhaps we should get a group action going
R
Roger higginbottom
6 years ago
Not able to use all of system but pay more than narrow boat, corruption at it's best
We actually take up less space on our current online mooring now we have a 47ft wide beam in contrast to our previous 60ft narrow boat but will pay more and CART will also get more from the next moorer who uses the extra space.