Skip to main content

Status: Closed — this petition is no longer accepting signatures.

Closed — 18 supporters Verified

Final supporters

W
William B.
K
Kris D.
M
Maria S.
D
Dennis l.
A
Atir a.
N
Nasser G.
S
Someone
T
Toshi M.
G
Gayla B.
V
Vivien N.
+8 more
LB
Started by Laura Beggins 8 years, 11 months ago

We the undersigned residents of the identified homes flooded by the continuous controlled release of water from Addicks & Barkers reservoirs after Hurricane Harvey submit that we've had quite enough water and sewage and we respectfully request that the City of Houston Water Department 1) grant those with pools a one-time accommodation for their refilling, and 2) that the sewage charge associated with our water bills for the months of September and October of 2017 be separated from water usage and waived.

18 Comments

T
Toshi Mochizuki
8 years ago Featured

We need this. Pool had to be emptied to get rid of sewer water! City contractor destroyed the sprinkler lines and much water was lost to the street!

V
Vivien N Dixon
8 years ago Featured

Unfair to have to pay City for water required to recover from a Gov't-caused flooding of our home, AND City workers busting our main pipes when collecting debris. Adding insult to injury.

W
William Braun
8 years ago

806 Walkwood Ct, Houston TX 77079

K
Kris D Hackett
8 years ago

Pool and sprinklers

M
Maria Solorzano
8 years ago

This petition to the City of Houston Water department seeks: ~ a one-time adjustment for refilling our pools and ~ the separation of sewage from water charge for August & September ~ waiver on sewage charges for the months of August & September. Thanks.

D
Dennis lozano
8 years ago

1035 Daria Dr

A
Art Attar
8 years ago

I called water district they can allow one time pool fill for new construction I hope they’ll consider cleaning our pools due to hurricane Harvey damage and mud slide

N
Nasser Goodarzi
8 years ago

The water and sewage destroyed our pools and that was because city wanted to open reservoirs to save others. No objection to that but city should pay for its decision no us.