Tara Community Opposition of New Apartment Buildings
564 Comments
F
Frank Terkhorn
2 years ago
I do NOT want the Apartment
Building constructed
B
Barbara Noe-Andromidas
2 years ago
Keep the trees and other flora, turn into a walking park. WE DONT NEED ANY MORE APARTMENTS OR CONCRETE OR BLACKTOP. CLIMATE IS CHANGING FOR THE WORSE!
D
David Cunningham
2 years ago
100% against this development in our community. Will deplete my real estate value.
S
Steve Rissler
2 years ago
Ne do not want a new apartment complex next to our neighborhood
C
Cheryl K Askins
2 years ago
The though of further disruption to the quiet Tara neighborhood and adding additional traffic to SR70 with a strained infrastructure already does not make logical sense. I am adamantly opposed to this development.
L
Lou Barbara DeMaria
2 years ago
Tara Blvd. can’t handle that many more Vehicles.
K
Ken nelson
2 years ago
Ther is enough accidents and traffic on that corner . Can the infrastructure handle more sewer and where will the water come from . Florida is getting over built.
B
Billie McLeod
2 years ago
I am opposed to having this building.
M
Mike Murphy
2 years ago
Tara is a nice, Well-balanced community. We do not need this additional crowding. Please do not let this happen. Keep our growth manageable and controlled.
M
Marcus Steed
2 years ago
Adding additional traffic to SR70 with a apartment complex is not a good idea
A
Alan Kuzell
2 years ago
Strongly opposed!
B
Barbara Pacelli
2 years ago
Vehemently oppose this project
J
John Hinze
2 years ago
As a resident of Tara, there is no good or compelling reason to revise or alter the existing planning and density ordinance in place for a building height and density change that would not fit into the surrounding neighborhood. This request by the developer for a zoning change is strictly for improving their project’s profitability and not as a stewards of the neighborhood. These zoning ordinances were put in place for our protection by the forethought of very bright futuristic planners and stewards of our county. If the developer wants to develop the area make them fulfill the requirements to fit within the existing ordinances and laws. Please do not allow for a “profit variance” that will be a precedent for every other developer to take advantage of afterward. Thank you!
R
Renee Rossi
2 years ago
This is a terrible use of land right next to our Tara community!
R
Richard Sereno
2 years ago
I am very much against the County Board of Commissioners voting to proceed with the building of a 156 unit apartment, 300+ parking space project on Tara Commercial Two Lots 5 & 6 and Goodwill parcel. The added traffic alone to one of the most dangerous intersections in the County make this proposal totally innapropreate to move forward.
O
Otto Dorozala
2 years ago
Keep TARA as nice as it is and do not allow to be overcrowded with this amount of new apartments
M
Mark Mosny
2 years ago
Owner/resident of 6501 Stone River Rd., #105
D
Diane Blades
2 years ago
Please do not allow the apartments to be built. The density in such a small area greatly increases traffic.
D
David Davis
2 years ago
This development is a horrible idea. It would endanger the community and diminish the quality of life in not only Tara but surrounding communities. No is the sensible vote.
M
Michael Halvorson
2 years ago
100% opposed to this deveopment. It doesn't fit the area plus adds significantly to already existing traffic hazard!
I do NOT want the Apartment Building constructed
Keep the trees and other flora, turn into a walking park. WE DONT NEED ANY MORE APARTMENTS OR CONCRETE OR BLACKTOP. CLIMATE IS CHANGING FOR THE WORSE!
100% against this development in our community. Will deplete my real estate value.
Ne do not want a new apartment complex next to our neighborhood
The though of further disruption to the quiet Tara neighborhood and adding additional traffic to SR70 with a strained infrastructure already does not make logical sense. I am adamantly opposed to this development.
Tara Blvd. can’t handle that many more Vehicles.
Ther is enough accidents and traffic on that corner . Can the infrastructure handle more sewer and where will the water come from . Florida is getting over built.
I am opposed to having this building.
Tara is a nice, Well-balanced community. We do not need this additional crowding. Please do not let this happen. Keep our growth manageable and controlled.
Adding additional traffic to SR70 with a apartment complex is not a good idea
Strongly opposed!
Vehemently oppose this project
As a resident of Tara, there is no good or compelling reason to revise or alter the existing planning and density ordinance in place for a building height and density change that would not fit into the surrounding neighborhood. This request by the developer for a zoning change is strictly for improving their project’s profitability and not as a stewards of the neighborhood. These zoning ordinances were put in place for our protection by the forethought of very bright futuristic planners and stewards of our county. If the developer wants to develop the area make them fulfill the requirements to fit within the existing ordinances and laws. Please do not allow for a “profit variance” that will be a precedent for every other developer to take advantage of afterward. Thank you!
This is a terrible use of land right next to our Tara community!
I am very much against the County Board of Commissioners voting to proceed with the building of a 156 unit apartment, 300+ parking space project on Tara Commercial Two Lots 5 & 6 and Goodwill parcel. The added traffic alone to one of the most dangerous intersections in the County make this proposal totally innapropreate to move forward.
Keep TARA as nice as it is and do not allow to be overcrowded with this amount of new apartments
Owner/resident of 6501 Stone River Rd., #105
Please do not allow the apartments to be built. The density in such a small area greatly increases traffic.
This development is a horrible idea. It would endanger the community and diminish the quality of life in not only Tara but surrounding communities. No is the sensible vote.
100% opposed to this deveopment. It doesn't fit the area plus adds significantly to already existing traffic hazard!