Support Bucks Council decision to conduct an EIA on proposed Bull Lane development
206 Comments
M
Meg Theakston
1 year ago
If an EIA is not carried out on this stretch of beautiful countryside then what is the point of EIAs? If not here - then where?
D
David Clark
1 year ago
Far too large a development. Bull Lane is already very busy during rush hours and school runs.
T
Tania Penton
1 year ago
We don’t have sufficient infrastructure to cope with such a large development,
As for schools and doctors they are already full to capacity.
Can the roads also cope with all the extra traffic
K
Karl Gravenor
1 year ago
Featured
Entirely inappropriate development for the purposes of profiteering and contributing nothing to those who need housing the most and all know these will be out of the reach of most home buyers. This also makes a mockery of green belt rules.
L
Lorraine Jones
1 year ago
A thorough EIA process is essential
N
Nicola Clark
1 year ago
The proposed development is much too large. Already our infrastructure, particularly regarding water supply and sewage is under pressure. Bull Lane and the A40 are incredibly busy during school and work rush-hours and we do not need potentially a further 1000 cars.
W
wood
1 year ago
totally unnecessary development on agricultural land
A
Anonymous
1 year ago
Our small village cannot handle this many new houses!
A
Anonymous
1 year ago
I support the councils decision and developers should not build anything without an EIA.
E
Eleanor Stevens
1 year ago
This is crucial
J
Janice Emerson
1 year ago
Needs an environmental impact assessment.
G
Guy Emerson
1 year ago
D s supporting the council decision. This needs an environmental impact assessment.
J
Jane Parker
1 year ago
We do not have the local infrastucture for that quantity of new builds.
S
Simon Dale
1 year ago
The impact on the current infrastructure (roads, schools, doctors) will be a disaster - we can’t cope as it is
K
K Scott
1 year ago
The developer needs to abide by the law
J
john Ferguson
1 year ago
I support the Council's decision requiring the need for an EIA
A
Anonymous
1 year ago
We need to protect our environment as far as we possibly can.
K
Kim Ashley Mr Wood
1 year ago
Featured
Infrastructure along Bull Lane can not currently cope with level of traffic. It takes over 10 minutes in peak time to move 400 yards along Bull Lane into Bullstrode Rd onto the A40. Where's the Health and Safety rules when needed to be applied , let alone common sense.
R
Rosa Mancer
1 year ago
I am extremely concerned about the polytion and added traffic that this will bring to Gerrards Cross. Also the schools are oversubscribed and so are the surgeries. This development wiuld be catastrophic
L
Lara May
1 year ago
Totally against building on a beautiful green belt area
If an EIA is not carried out on this stretch of beautiful countryside then what is the point of EIAs? If not here - then where?
Far too large a development. Bull Lane is already very busy during rush hours and school runs.
We don’t have sufficient infrastructure to cope with such a large development, As for schools and doctors they are already full to capacity. Can the roads also cope with all the extra traffic
Entirely inappropriate development for the purposes of profiteering and contributing nothing to those who need housing the most and all know these will be out of the reach of most home buyers. This also makes a mockery of green belt rules.
A thorough EIA process is essential
The proposed development is much too large. Already our infrastructure, particularly regarding water supply and sewage is under pressure. Bull Lane and the A40 are incredibly busy during school and work rush-hours and we do not need potentially a further 1000 cars.
totally unnecessary development on agricultural land
Our small village cannot handle this many new houses!
I support the councils decision and developers should not build anything without an EIA.
This is crucial
Needs an environmental impact assessment.
D s supporting the council decision. This needs an environmental impact assessment.
We do not have the local infrastucture for that quantity of new builds.
The impact on the current infrastructure (roads, schools, doctors) will be a disaster - we can’t cope as it is
The developer needs to abide by the law
I support the Council's decision requiring the need for an EIA
We need to protect our environment as far as we possibly can.
Infrastructure along Bull Lane can not currently cope with level of traffic. It takes over 10 minutes in peak time to move 400 yards along Bull Lane into Bullstrode Rd onto the A40. Where's the Health and Safety rules when needed to be applied , let alone common sense.
I am extremely concerned about the polytion and added traffic that this will bring to Gerrards Cross. Also the schools are oversubscribed and so are the surgeries. This development wiuld be catastrophic
Totally against building on a beautiful green belt area