Support Bucks Council decision to conduct an EIA on proposed Bull Lane development

9 months ago Featured

This development should be fully assessed before given the go-ahead or other. It is a very large development for a relatively small town which is already plagued by traffic congestion and inadequate services, such as having no GP practice.

The traffic is already horrendous in Bull Lane due to school run traffic for St Joseph’s school and Gayhurst school.

The roads in this area are already overcrowded and dangerous for pedestrians, cyclists and cars. This would significantly impact traffic and school hours would become frankly hazardous

Against the idea. Far too many homes, will cause chaos traffic during the build for many years. Not to forget the lack of GPS and phone signals around the area amongst the tree's. Also the huge number wildlife at risk.

Totally agree with Councils decision to insist on study

An environmental impact report is essential to identify the wildlife and fauna and flora that would be destroyed by such a development - which the local infrastructure would not in any event support. Animals are already being killed by the current road system, such a move would kill, remove the delicate ecosystems and habits and drive further animals into harms way

I oppose

An EIA must be completed

Please ensure an EIA is completed

An EIA must be completed - absolutely essential.

An EIA is absolutely essential and muat be completed.

An EIA is an absolute requirement and should not be circumvented

It would be totally irresponsible for the developer to not have to do an EIA.

Environmental impact assessments happen for small projects like 12 houses, so why it it even up for debate whether nearly 500 new houses should have to do this!! Esp of green belt land. Shocking!!

The Green belt was set up to prevent over development and green space and fields. How can this be even considered for planning and there is certainly NOT sufficient infrastructure to support so many home and families. The doctors and schools are all over subscribed already.

The proposed entrance is at a point of the road which has been prone to significant flooding. This is an of already high congestion, which is regularly gridlocked with the existing weight of traffic. I am personally aware of 3 RTAs which have happened at that junction in recent years, so can only imagine how many of actually occurred. It is already a dangerous pinch point in road system which could not support anything like the increase in traffic which would this proposal would result in.

It is imperative that an EIA should be carried out for the proposed Bull Lane GX development. Nowhere is there room to provide bicycle lanes in bull lane, there isn't even a pedestrian footpath. The land is very elevated thus allowing building on it would cause more problems to the already flooding which occurs on the Oxford road and in the lower part of Bull Lane. The land is valuable green belt agricultural land. There is an abundance of wild life. Gerrards cross does not have sufficient infrastructure in the way of schools or doctors. Currently the gx population goes to chalfont St Peter for a doctor, they are overloaded. One state school, primary in gx. Which is also overloaded.

Gerrards Cross does not have the necessary infrastructure. Dentists doctors schools drainage police.

Upgrade existing, older homes/estates and roads, leave the countryside and wild life to be just that.

I feel this is completely the wrong area for such a huge development. The infrastructure cannot cope with this.