Support Bucks Council decision to conduct an EIA on proposed Bull Lane development
206 Comments
A
Anonymous
9 months ago
We object to this development as current services - schools, health services, roads and lack of long term assessment has not been carried out.
There are a number of sites being considered for development and if they were all approved the impact would be multiplied!
Need an over all road and supporting infrastructure to be approved as part of planning process.
S
Sheila Woolgar
9 months ago
Please do not allow this planning on green belt land which will not work with the roads and village support that we have
S
Seamus Fagan
9 months ago
I fully support the councils decision that an EIA Assessment should be conducted
E
Emma Henderson
9 months ago
I support Bucks CC decision to conduct an EIA on the Bull Lane Development
H
Heather Smith
9 months ago
I object atrungly to the planning for 485 new homes backing into Bull Lane. The roads are insufficient for the increased traffic heading
to schools and workplaces. The infrastructure of both Gerrards cross and Chalfont are overstretched currently and services such as schools, dentists and doctors are already oversubscribed. It is unclear if the sewage system would bear the strain and of paramount importance, the loss of greenbelt to the area would be lamentable
S
Suzanne Hayes
9 months ago
Gerrards Cross is already over crowded,no were for people to park.The common is overcrowded at weekends.The station car park is full.
N
Norman Holmes
9 months ago
Keep pressure on this as government will agree to development where opportunity ecists to tie in either existing infrastructure. Sign ‘yes’ st the Neighbourhood Plan referendum this Thursday 23rd it will do as much as is possible, in law, to maintain our cherished greenbelt
J
Jenny Cochrane
9 months ago
Whilst more housing may be needed, this development won’t address the need for affordable housing or the desperate need for more social housing. It will however put more demand on existing schools & doctors.
T
Tania Gibson
9 months ago
Outrageous! It’s green belt land filled with wildlife. Our schools and surgeries / hospital are already overloaded too. Strongly disagree
D
David Small
9 months ago
Save the green belt land in gerrards crosw
O
Ophelia Kingham-Head
9 months ago
This is killing our wildlife and ecosystems
J
Jacqueline Lobato
9 months ago
This appeal is a disgrace - the requirement of a full and proper impact assessment should be upheld.
R
Roger Havelock
9 months ago
Too many houses
C
Chris Bushby
9 months ago
No
P
Peter Hall
9 months ago
The environmental report is fundamental information to assess a planning submission. Further even if this submission is approved the council will need this to assess CIL and/or s.106
R
Rebekah Mathers
9 months ago
Protect the wildlife please
A
Anonymous
9 months ago
Obviously, no comment.
J
Julie Kinchin
9 months ago
We need to protect our green belt once it’s gone it’s gone
A
Anonymous
9 months ago
It’s essential to do an impact assessment for Gerrards Cross which is small village/town and needs sustainable and well thought through development lead by developers who act with integrity
S
Sarah Bowen
9 months ago
I am strongly against this development. Schools, GP's, Roads, etc are already stretched. This development definitely needs an EIA before anything is even considered.
We object to this development as current services - schools, health services, roads and lack of long term assessment has not been carried out. There are a number of sites being considered for development and if they were all approved the impact would be multiplied! Need an over all road and supporting infrastructure to be approved as part of planning process.
Please do not allow this planning on green belt land which will not work with the roads and village support that we have
I fully support the councils decision that an EIA Assessment should be conducted
I support Bucks CC decision to conduct an EIA on the Bull Lane Development
I object atrungly to the planning for 485 new homes backing into Bull Lane. The roads are insufficient for the increased traffic heading to schools and workplaces. The infrastructure of both Gerrards cross and Chalfont are overstretched currently and services such as schools, dentists and doctors are already oversubscribed. It is unclear if the sewage system would bear the strain and of paramount importance, the loss of greenbelt to the area would be lamentable
Gerrards Cross is already over crowded,no were for people to park.The common is overcrowded at weekends.The station car park is full.
Keep pressure on this as government will agree to development where opportunity ecists to tie in either existing infrastructure. Sign ‘yes’ st the Neighbourhood Plan referendum this Thursday 23rd it will do as much as is possible, in law, to maintain our cherished greenbelt
Whilst more housing may be needed, this development won’t address the need for affordable housing or the desperate need for more social housing. It will however put more demand on existing schools & doctors.
Outrageous! It’s green belt land filled with wildlife. Our schools and surgeries / hospital are already overloaded too. Strongly disagree
Save the green belt land in gerrards crosw
This is killing our wildlife and ecosystems
This appeal is a disgrace - the requirement of a full and proper impact assessment should be upheld.
Too many houses
No
The environmental report is fundamental information to assess a planning submission. Further even if this submission is approved the council will need this to assess CIL and/or s.106
Protect the wildlife please
Obviously, no comment.
We need to protect our green belt once it’s gone it’s gone
It’s essential to do an impact assessment for Gerrards Cross which is small village/town and needs sustainable and well thought through development lead by developers who act with integrity
I am strongly against this development. Schools, GP's, Roads, etc are already stretched. This development definitely needs an EIA before anything is even considered.