STOP the TDSB EETF: NO to De-streaming; NO to Cancelling Specialty Programs; NO to Cancelling Optional Attendance; NO to "reforming" Gifted Programs
555 Comments
J
Jennifer Elliott
8 years ago
I strongly object to cancelling the programs
V
Victoria Stewart
8 years ago
My son is thriving in the gifted program. I was told that part of the criteria for getting a place in the gifted program that was taken into account was the families ability to provide enrichment activities as a single mom I rely on the gifted program to provide enrichment support that I cannot otherwise pay for.
T
teresita constantino
8 years ago
no need for donation
D
DAN DASCALU
8 years ago
You can't mix oil and water. Cancelling gifted programs means to go back 50 years when nobody understood that gifted programs are to ensure the future excellence of Canada.
L
Lana Reader
8 years ago
Destreaming failed 20 years ago. LD students need as more options than being dumped in a class with academic level students. Don’t treat them like garbage.
W
Wei Wu
8 years ago
NO to "reforming" Gifted Programs
N
Narcisa Pop
8 years ago
Say NO to De-streaming
Say NO to Cancelling Specialty Programs like Arts, TOPS, IB
Say NO to Cancelling Optional Attendance
Say NO to "reforming" Gifted Programs
I
Imelda Biona
8 years ago
I strongly oppose for the removal of gifted program
N
Neil Skinner
8 years ago
It is clear this task force has no regard for equity or enhancing anything. It has one goal - cut costs with no regard to consequences to education.
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
Please rethink and reject the TDSB EETF recommendations. Let's work with the diversity in our schools!
P
Peter Maropakis
8 years ago
I Say NO, to destreaming, cancelling specialty programs, and cancelling optional attendance.. Keep Gifted and all special education.
D
Daniel Coutts
8 years ago
Featured
Congregated Gifted Programs in a public school provide the only equitable access to the special needs of gifted students. Anything else forces these special needs students to private schools, where most can't afford it. Not fair. Not equitable.
S
Swadhin Saha
8 years ago
Gifted program needs to be continued.
D
David Knechtel
8 years ago
I support creating more access, but not by de-streaming. On other big decisions, TDSB tests a theory (eg. technology in classrooms), verifies it achieves outcomes and carefully makes changes that are communicated in advance. Why would it not test this theory on a pilot basis (or several approaches - eg create more access), validate which approach works best and then make changes???
L
Lilly McIsaac
8 years ago
I would also like more community consultations and more time to read the report
Q
QING YUAN
8 years ago
The existence of Gifted Program is crucially beneficial to my son who absolutely thrives in it. This is a good program as it is now. Improvements are needed perhaps, but definitely not cancellation.
K
Karen Mazurkewich
8 years ago
This has been working for our daughter -- and we think it should continue.
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
I strongly object to cancelling the programs
J
Julie Sole
8 years ago
Equity means giving each student options and opportunities that meet their unique needs NOT taking away their individuality. EETF takes education back to the dark ages.
I strongly object to cancelling the programs
My son is thriving in the gifted program. I was told that part of the criteria for getting a place in the gifted program that was taken into account was the families ability to provide enrichment activities as a single mom I rely on the gifted program to provide enrichment support that I cannot otherwise pay for.
no need for donation
You can't mix oil and water. Cancelling gifted programs means to go back 50 years when nobody understood that gifted programs are to ensure the future excellence of Canada.
Destreaming failed 20 years ago. LD students need as more options than being dumped in a class with academic level students. Don’t treat them like garbage.
NO to "reforming" Gifted Programs
Say NO to De-streaming Say NO to Cancelling Specialty Programs like Arts, TOPS, IB Say NO to Cancelling Optional Attendance Say NO to "reforming" Gifted Programs
I strongly oppose for the removal of gifted program
It is clear this task force has no regard for equity or enhancing anything. It has one goal - cut costs with no regard to consequences to education.
Please rethink and reject the TDSB EETF recommendations. Let's work with the diversity in our schools!
I Say NO, to destreaming, cancelling specialty programs, and cancelling optional attendance.. Keep Gifted and all special education.
Congregated Gifted Programs in a public school provide the only equitable access to the special needs of gifted students. Anything else forces these special needs students to private schools, where most can't afford it. Not fair. Not equitable.
Gifted program needs to be continued.
I support creating more access, but not by de-streaming. On other big decisions, TDSB tests a theory (eg. technology in classrooms), verifies it achieves outcomes and carefully makes changes that are communicated in advance. Why would it not test this theory on a pilot basis (or several approaches - eg create more access), validate which approach works best and then make changes???
I would also like more community consultations and more time to read the report
The existence of Gifted Program is crucially beneficial to my son who absolutely thrives in it. This is a good program as it is now. Improvements are needed perhaps, but definitely not cancellation.
This has been working for our daughter -- and we think it should continue.
I strongly object to cancelling the programs
Equity means giving each student options and opportunities that meet their unique needs NOT taking away their individuality. EETF takes education back to the dark ages.
No to destreaming. No to reforming gifted