STOP the TDSB EETF: NO to De-streaming; NO to Cancelling Specialty Programs; NO to Cancelling Optional Attendance; NO to "reforming" Gifted Programs
STOP the TDSB EETF
- Say NO to De-streaming
- Say NO to Cancelling Specialty Programs like Arts, TOPS, IB
- Say NO to Cancelling Optional Attendance
- Say NO to "reforming" Gifted Programs
Reject the TDSB EETF recommendations. Have the TDSB give much more time for feedback, broader re-consult & better options.
The TDSB’s mandate is to educate ALL students to each reach their potential. To meet the very diverse learning needs of TDSB’s exceptionally varied student population, a very large range of research-proven learning strategies and practical options are needed. Solutions that are appropriate and excellent for some learning needs may be completely inappropriate and destructive or counter-productive for other learning needs. With over 250,000 students, TDSB is not only the largest school board in the country
(and 4th largest in North America), it is also the most diverse in every way, from learning needs to demographics.
It makes no sense at all to apply a single approach or ‘one size fits no one’ solution to meet all of these diverse needs - which is what the EETF is suggesting!
The TDSB is large enough to obtain access to and apply a huge variety of real and excellent research-proven solutions, and it should do so.
The “Enhancing Equity Task Force” (EETF): An outside consultant, without deep experience in education, was hired by the TDSB to seek and summarize comments about “equity” from specifically targeted underperforming student groups. That is exactly what the consultant did. The consultant did not analyze robust education research, or provide multiple options for review and consideration, or provide a balanced, objective analysis of education needs and solutions, although the EETF “Task Force” name might seem designed to suggest otherwise.
For over a year the EETF sought and obtained input from the targeted groups and their specific advocates, although the total number of contributors was far less than 1% of the total TDSB student population. The ensuing report, released quietly and to limited numbers of parents in October, gave the rest of the TDSB families (representing over 99% of the ‘unheard’ TDSB student population) THREE WEEKS to “provide feedback”, which after outraged responses from parents was extended for only an additional mere THREE weeks.
Parents are extremely concerned about numerous aspects of the Report’s design, structure, and recommendations including: systemic process flaws; lack of logical connections between observations and recommendations; lack of relevant, tested, and diverse supporting research; sweeping recommendations that don’t consider broader and unintended consequences or realistic outcomes for the majority of students including those targeted.
Flawed underlying assumptions include: misuse of the concept of “equity” (it means “fairness” not “equal”); and an attempt to achieve “equal outcomes” (which is impossible), instead of seeking “equal opportunities” for EACH student to achieve their potential (which is the proper and stated goal of our education system). Parents believe that many of the changes are not only bad for most or all students in the board, but will also not help the targeted groups in the ways desired.
These criticisms and concerns about the Report do not negate the need to help the targeted groups, who do need help. However, many other very diverse groups need help too.
Their incredibly diverse variety of learning and other needs, require an incredibly diverse variety of effective targeted solutions. This requires and starts with much more time and REAL opportunities for broad-based feedback and REAL consultation. This approach will be much better for all students, including the targeted groups.
Much better solutions are available to solve a much more diverse array of student needs, and THIS is what the TDSB should be working on.
Updates
December 9, 2017
One thousand people have told the TDSB that their destructive EETF recommendations are unacceptable. The board thinks they can quietly dismantle our specialty programs without a fight but they are dead wrong.
Reached 1,000 supporters
December 7, 2017
December 5, 2017
The TDSB bureaucrats think they can dismantle our specialized programs while we sit quietly and watch. We need to hit one thousand signatures immediately to prove they cannot ignore our outrage. Send this link to everyone you know right now so they feel the full weight of our opposition.
November 16, 2017
The EETF bureaucrats think they can dismantle our schools without a fight. We just hit 100 signatures and this is only the beginning of the pressure we are putting on the board.
Reached 100 supporters
November 14, 2017
555 Comments
A separate streamed Gifted program is essential. Gifted kids will not thrive in regular, integrated classrooms. I know for a fact, because my son was in one until grade 4. Once he entered a Gifted stream, he found his place in the world and truly thrived.
Why is it the TDSB sends out mass notices about lice but NOTHING about a policy that will affect so many of our kids? Something like this needs input from more than a select group of people. You have the means to get true input - why didn't you?
My son found his confidence and his voice in the gifted program. No longer an ‘outsider with behavioral issues’ - he is now a bright kid who understands himself and can contribute his ideas , his passion and his dreams to the world without stigma.
My son entering gr9 will be negatively impacted by the destreaming in gr 9 & 10. My other son is part of the HPA program and both will attend under optional attendance. More research needs to be done and this should not be rushed to change.
Reducing enhancement and enrichment opportunities & dumbing down programs so all kids have equal access to a sub par opportunity is a complete failure in leadership. EETF should be about resolving access inequality not reducing quality of education.
No to these changes that will significantly impact our children's learning in a negative manner
Seems ridiculous to do incredible amounts of work and programming for equity in younger grades, then take away all options that ensure equity in higher grades.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
By signing, you accept our Terms and Privacy Policy and agree to occasional emails about petitions. Unsubscribe anytime.
Share this petition
Share this petition to help it reach more people.
Your share link
STOP the TDSB EETF: NO to De-streaming; NO to Cancelling Specialty Programs; NO to Cancelling Optional Attendance; NO to "reforming" Gifted Programs
STOP the TDSB EETF
- Say NO to De-streaming
- Say NO to Cancelling Specialty Programs like Arts, TOPS, IB
- Say NO to Cancelling Optional Attendance
- Say NO to "reforming" Gifted Programs
Reject the TDSB EETF recommendations. Have the TDSB give much more time for feedback, broader re-consult & better options.
The TDSB’s mandate is to educate ALL students to each reach their potential. To meet the very diverse learning needs of TDSB’s exceptionally varied student population, a very large range of research-proven learning strategies and practical options are needed. Solutions that are appropriate and excellent for some learning needs may be completely inappropriate and destructive or counter-productive for other learning needs. With over 250,000 students, TDSB is not only the largest school board in the country
(and 4th largest in North America), it is also the most diverse in every way, from learning needs to demographics.
It makes no sense at all to apply a single approach or ‘one size fits no one’ solution to meet all of these diverse needs - which is what the EETF is suggesting!
The TDSB is large enough to obtain access to and apply a huge variety of real and excellent research-proven solutions, and it should do so.
The “Enhancing Equity Task Force” (EETF): An outside consultant, without deep experience in education, was hired by the TDSB to seek and summarize comments about “equity” from specifically targeted underperforming student groups. That is exactly what the consultant did. The consultant did not analyze robust education research, or provide multiple options for review and consideration, or provide a balanced, objective analysis of education needs and solutions, although the EETF “Task Force” name might seem designed to suggest otherwise.
For over a year the EETF sought and obtained input from the targeted groups and their specific advocates, although the total number of contributors was far less than 1% of the total TDSB student population. The ensuing report, released quietly and to limited numbers of parents in October, gave the rest of the TDSB families (representing over 99% of the ‘unheard’ TDSB student population) THREE WEEKS to “provide feedback”, which after outraged responses from parents was extended for only an additional mere THREE weeks.
Parents are extremely concerned about numerous aspects of the Report’s design, structure, and recommendations including: systemic process flaws; lack of logical connections between observations and recommendations; lack of relevant, tested, and diverse supporting research; sweeping recommendations that don’t consider broader and unintended consequences or realistic outcomes for the majority of students including those targeted.
Flawed underlying assumptions include: misuse of the concept of “equity” (it means “fairness” not “equal”); and an attempt to achieve “equal outcomes” (which is impossible), instead of seeking “equal opportunities” for EACH student to achieve their potential (which is the proper and stated goal of our education system). Parents believe that many of the changes are not only bad for most or all students in the board, but will also not help the targeted groups in the ways desired.
These criticisms and concerns about the Report do not negate the need to help the targeted groups, who do need help. However, many other very diverse groups need help too.
Their incredibly diverse variety of learning and other needs, require an incredibly diverse variety of effective targeted solutions. This requires and starts with much more time and REAL opportunities for broad-based feedback and REAL consultation. This approach will be much better for all students, including the targeted groups.
Much better solutions are available to solve a much more diverse array of student needs, and THIS is what the TDSB should be working on.
Updates
December 9, 2017
One thousand people have told the TDSB that their destructive EETF recommendations are unacceptable. The board thinks they can quietly dismantle our specialty programs without a fight but they are dead wrong.
Reached 1,000 supporters
December 7, 2017
December 5, 2017
The TDSB bureaucrats think they can dismantle our specialized programs while we sit quietly and watch. We need to hit one thousand signatures immediately to prove they cannot ignore our outrage. Send this link to everyone you know right now so they feel the full weight of our opposition.
November 16, 2017
The EETF bureaucrats think they can dismantle our schools without a fight. We just hit 100 signatures and this is only the beginning of the pressure we are putting on the board.
Reached 100 supporters
November 14, 2017
555 Comments
Congregated Gifted Programs in a public school provide the only equitable access to the special needs of gifted students. Anything else forces these special needs students to private schools, where most can't afford it. Not fair. Not equitable.
A separate streamed Gifted program is essential. Gifted kids will not thrive in regular, integrated classrooms. I know for a fact, because my son was in one until grade 4. Once he entered a Gifted stream, he found his place in the world and truly thrived.
Why is it the TDSB sends out mass notices about lice but NOTHING about a policy that will affect so many of our kids? Something like this needs input from more than a select group of people. You have the means to get true input - why didn't you?
My son found his confidence and his voice in the gifted program. No longer an ‘outsider with behavioral issues’ - he is now a bright kid who understands himself and can contribute his ideas , his passion and his dreams to the world without stigma.
My son entering gr9 will be negatively impacted by the destreaming in gr 9 & 10. My other son is part of the HPA program and both will attend under optional attendance. More research needs to be done and this should not be rushed to change.
Reducing enhancement and enrichment opportunities & dumbing down programs so all kids have equal access to a sub par opportunity is a complete failure in leadership. EETF should be about resolving access inequality not reducing quality of education.
No to these changes that will significantly impact our children's learning in a negative manner
Seems ridiculous to do incredible amounts of work and programming for equity in younger grades, then take away all options that ensure equity in higher grades.
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach 2,500 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via .
Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Signing with Google or Facebook verifies your signature instantly — no email needed.
By signing, you accept our Terms and Privacy Policy and agree to occasional emails about petitions. Unsubscribe anytime.
Share this petition
Share this petition to help it reach more people.
Your share link
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Scan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
Congregated Gifted Programs in a public school provide the only equitable access to the special needs of gifted students. Anything else forces these special needs students to private schools, where most can't afford it. Not fair. Not equitable.