Skip to main content

PUMA 2 GO!

775 Comments

N
Nik Sellheim
9 years ago

Dunsborough does not need either another petrol station or any more "convenience" stores. the traffic congestion in hoiday times is already severe.

G
Graham Fisher
9 years ago

Dunsborough does not need another convenience store and especially no more petrol outlets

G
Graham Fisher
9 years ago

Find somewhere out of the village centre

P
Pip Jarvis
9 years ago

Some development on this site must preserve the beautiful trees which are probably over 100 years old. A service station is not a suitable subsitute

P
Pip Jarvis
9 years ago

This is not a suitable site for a petrol stn/store. Traffic congestion coming from Coles is already a problem that needs to be solved. Don't add to it.

C
Chris Heyring
9 years ago

Please locate this petrol station further away from the centre of our rapidly growing town and reserve the space for more appropriate shops or other premium human based activities.

B
Bev Stone
9 years ago

A petrol station in the Main Street of Dunsborough is not acceptable as petrol stations should be in accessible areas that don't compromise the vision for the town. A more suitable position would be in the LIA.

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

STUPID IDEA

S
Stan Still
9 years ago

Doesn't this syndicate own half the town already? How much money do you need to be happy? Go away with the stinking fuel station and come back with a development proposal that the community will support.

S
Sabine Hofferberth
9 years ago

Dunsborough has to be protected from this unsafe and unsightly development

H
Harry Baals
9 years ago

No, no, no... to infinity.

J
John Kuppens
9 years ago

Lets hope common sense prevails over the development dollar.

T
Trish Flower
9 years ago

How ridiculous you would consider this site for your development. Not only are you out of step with current urban design, and community building, you risk sustained backlash from the residents of this town. Please consider the wishes and feedback of the community. Commercial gain is one thing, but thoughtful responsible development in a small tourist precinct is another. We strongly urge you to consider an alternative site. We do not need additional cars, trucks, tankers, boats, caravans, trailers in our main street. Businesses are owned by local families and further congestion and unsafe streets for for pedestrians will impact on their livelihood. We take pride in our town and community groups have been activelyworking with our local City officers to create a more pedestrian friendly, aesthetically pleasing CBD. Please don't spoil our efforts. Respect our wishes.

J
John Malloy
9 years ago

This is quite unbelievable. Against the wishes of the Community, the City of Busselton and the SWJDAP, Puma and the local developers are pushing forward with a service station that will detrimentally impact our Community for years to come. We all need to get behind this "No To Puma" movement and put our Communities best interest first.

J
Jeremy Wilton
9 years ago

Not needed and not wanted in our town PUMA..!

R
Rob johnston
9 years ago

This is not required and the proponents need to have a long hard look at what the people of dunsborough want and need. This is not it!!

M
Michael Coffey
9 years ago

Have it on the bypassing road as to get passing traffic as locals will still go there as well.

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

Unnecessary, unaesthetic and a potential traffic headache

E
Eddie and Julie Phillips
9 years ago

Ridiculous, the last thing we need in this town. We will certainly be on the list to boycott it, and will do everything to see it fail if it is given the go ahead. Surly no-one is stupid enough to vote for it.

D
Dominique Trouchet
9 years ago

It is a ludicrous proposal, Dunsborough needs many things , another petrol station is not one. Please reconsider, build something beautiful.