Skip to main content
Say NO to large "party pavilion" on Schoettler Rd

Say NO to large "party pavilion" on Schoettler Rd

66 signatures 34 to reach 100
F
Frank M. signed
C
Cyndi d. signed
E
Emily C. signed
K
Kerra B. signed
S
Sara S. signed
S
Steve E. signed
N
Nancy C. signed
B
Brad B. signed
S
Someone signed
C
Carol W. signed
KU
Started by Kelli Unnerstall 5 years, 3 months ago

Want an influx of traffic, a parking lot full of cars, and a large company picnic being held on Schoettler Rd? If NO, then please sign this petition.

PLEASE HAVE EACH PERSON IN YOUR HOUSEHOLD SIGN THIS PETITION. WE NEED TO LET THE PARKS DEPARTMENT AND CITY COUNCIL KNOW THAT WE WANT TO PRESERVE SCHOETTLER AND NOT ALLOW IT TO BECOME A PLACE TO HOST PARTIES AND COMPANY PICNICS.

1. Preserve Schoettler. Schoettler Rd is a quiet, nature filled road that is not the appropriate place for a large (65 person) pavilion that will be rented out for parties. Schoettler Rd and Logan Park are not the place for company picnics and large graduation and birthday parties. This would bring noise and significant traffic to an otherwise peaceful area.

2. No Large Pavilions. Logan Park is supposed to be a neighborhood park. A pavilion, if built, should serve as a shelter and place to gather and eat for small groups of people using the park on a daily basis. There should be no "party pavilion" in this park. We do not support the size of the pavilion (65 person) being built in this park.

3. Restrict Pavilion Rentals. For any type of pavilion built in this park, we do not support the pavilion being used for rentals on a daily basis. Rentals should be restricted to once per month in the park and there should be a strict limit on the number of people allowed in the pavilion (no more than 25).

4. Citizen Input Matters! It is unfortunate that Logan Park is being built without any input from the surrounding neighborhoods. The beautiful parcel of land is in the middle of a residential district and the input of residents should be considered when determining what is appropriate and desired for this new park. Stop construction until there is a community information gathering session, similar to what was done for Central Park. Residents deserve to have input.

25 Comments

F
Frank Marchiony
5 years ago Featured

A pavilion for 65+ people is clearly not favored, and a compromise is easy: a smaller pavilion for 25 people is suitable and acceptable. See David Trompeter's suggestions.

C
Cyndi dreyfus
5 years ago Featured

The plan for this simple quiet play park has taken on a life that is unsuitable to the residents it was intended to serve. The city received a gift and now is trying reap $$$ for their pockets, rather than provide a reasonable, useable green space for enjoyment!!

D
David Trompeter
5 years ago Featured

Logan Park is a very small park. Logan will be our ONLY park in Ward 3. Think kickball on grass instead of more asphalt! Our Chesterfield neighbors don’t want a massive asphalt parking lot for huge 65 person party rental pavilion. Please build a smaller 25 person “occasional rental use” pavilion. Then scatter additional “individual use” picnic tables and charcoal grills around the park for separate WALK IN use! A playground is always a great idea. Replace the larger parking lot with Pickle Ball, Bocce Ball and Cornhole courts! Thank You.

J
Joyce Saffa
5 years ago Featured

Since this will be a small, "pocket" park, the emphasis should be on green space and nature, not on a pavilion and parking for a multitude of cars. A pavilion of that type would not enhance what is already a lovely area. A playground and picnic area would be a great fit for this location. My family is looking forward to enjoying a small, beautiful neighborhood park with an emphasis on nature and green space.

G
Garett Ostdiek-Wille
5 years ago Featured

This would undermine the family atmosphere of the neighborhood. It would also make the roads less safe with increased traffic.

R
Robert Wulff
5 years ago Featured

No large pavilion! This is right next door to our subdivison and in my backyard.

B
Brad Brunk
5 years ago

NO!

C
Carol Wren
5 years ago

Just say no, please!

Help this petition grow

Share it with friends to help reach 100 signatures.

Sign Petition

We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.

or sign with Email

Add a comment?

Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.

By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Share Petition

Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact

Copy link or share directly

Instagram
QR Code