A pavilion for 65+ people is clearly not favored, and a compromise is easy: a smaller pavilion for 25 people is suitable and acceptable. See David Trompeter's suggestions.
C
Cyndi dreyfus
5 years ago
Featured
The plan for this simple quiet play park has taken on a life that is unsuitable to the residents it was intended to serve. The city received a gift and now is trying reap $$$ for their pockets, rather than provide a reasonable, useable green space for enjoyment!!
B
Brad Brunk
5 years ago
NO!
C
Carol Wren
5 years ago
Just say no, please!
L
Lois Protopsaltis
5 years ago
Please don’t go ahead with this pavilion
K
Kyra Ellis-Brown
5 years ago
A large pavilion is inappropriate for such a small park located so closely to surrounding homes and neighborhoods. In addition will disturb the flow of traffic and peace of homeowners.
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
Too large a pavilion proposed for the space.
C
Crump George
5 years ago
Pavilions belong in the Central Park.
D
David Trompeter
5 years ago
Featured
Logan Park is a very small park. Logan will be our ONLY park in Ward 3. Think kickball on grass instead of more asphalt! Our Chesterfield neighbors don’t want a massive asphalt parking lot for huge 65 person party rental pavilion. Please build a smaller 25 person “occasional rental use” pavilion. Then scatter additional “individual use” picnic tables and charcoal grills around the park for separate WALK IN use! A playground is always a great idea. Replace the larger parking lot with Pickle Ball, Bocce Ball and Cornhole courts! Thank You.
R
Rick and Cyndi Dreyfus
5 years ago
Do not have a pavilion. No need for more traffic.
B
Bryon Bach
5 years ago
Accidents waiting to happen!
J
Janet Schwarze
5 years ago
Would like to sign the petition for a party pavilion at the new, Logan Park
G
Gary Gorsuch
5 years ago
I do NOT want a 65+ pavilion at Logan Park.
S
Susan Gorsuch
5 years ago
NO - 65+ person pavilion @ Logan Park!
J
Joyce Saffa
5 years ago
Featured
Since this will be a small, "pocket" park,
the emphasis should be on green space and nature, not on a pavilion and parking for a multitude of cars. A pavilion of that type would not enhance what is already a lovely area. A playground and picnic area would be a great fit for this location. My family is looking forward to enjoying a small, beautiful neighborhood park with an emphasis on nature and green space.
B
Bill Hemberger
5 years ago
Schoettler Park should focus on local, children's needs....
D
David Eisenstein
5 years ago
This is a very bad idea. Please consider the importance of maintaining the peaceful nature of Schoettler Road.
M
Mary Askey
5 years ago
Please do not erect a large shelter that will allow for large gatherings and parties in our neighborhood park.
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
No pavilion please
G
Glenn Paquette
5 years ago
Frequent large gatherings would destroy the neighborhood.
A pavilion for 65+ people is clearly not favored, and a compromise is easy: a smaller pavilion for 25 people is suitable and acceptable. See David Trompeter's suggestions.
The plan for this simple quiet play park has taken on a life that is unsuitable to the residents it was intended to serve. The city received a gift and now is trying reap $$$ for their pockets, rather than provide a reasonable, useable green space for enjoyment!!
NO!
Just say no, please!
Please don’t go ahead with this pavilion
A large pavilion is inappropriate for such a small park located so closely to surrounding homes and neighborhoods. In addition will disturb the flow of traffic and peace of homeowners.
Too large a pavilion proposed for the space.
Pavilions belong in the Central Park.
Logan Park is a very small park. Logan will be our ONLY park in Ward 3. Think kickball on grass instead of more asphalt! Our Chesterfield neighbors don’t want a massive asphalt parking lot for huge 65 person party rental pavilion. Please build a smaller 25 person “occasional rental use” pavilion. Then scatter additional “individual use” picnic tables and charcoal grills around the park for separate WALK IN use! A playground is always a great idea. Replace the larger parking lot with Pickle Ball, Bocce Ball and Cornhole courts! Thank You.
Do not have a pavilion. No need for more traffic.
Accidents waiting to happen!
Would like to sign the petition for a party pavilion at the new, Logan Park
I do NOT want a 65+ pavilion at Logan Park.
NO - 65+ person pavilion @ Logan Park!
Since this will be a small, "pocket" park, the emphasis should be on green space and nature, not on a pavilion and parking for a multitude of cars. A pavilion of that type would not enhance what is already a lovely area. A playground and picnic area would be a great fit for this location. My family is looking forward to enjoying a small, beautiful neighborhood park with an emphasis on nature and green space.
Schoettler Park should focus on local, children's needs....
This is a very bad idea. Please consider the importance of maintaining the peaceful nature of Schoettler Road.
Please do not erect a large shelter that will allow for large gatherings and parties in our neighborhood park.
No pavilion please
Frequent large gatherings would destroy the neighborhood.