Skip to main content

The trees are safe and that beautiful old camphor is staying exactly where it belongs. I am basically shaking right now because honestly I thought the developers were going to win this one but the city finally listened to reason. Keep an eye on that corner because we might have …

June 23, 2016

Save the Trees on Amherst & Gorham

Save the Trees on Amherst & Gorham

🏆 Won — 198 supporters Verified

Final supporters

M
Misery D.
S
Someone
J
Jason G.
S
Stacy B.
S
Someone
G
Gola R.
J
John k.
S
Someone
K
Krystina r.
A
Alex S.
+188 more
JC
Started by Jane Chung 10 years, 5 months ago

The Bureau of Street Services has received a permit request to remove 4 mature trees along Amherst Ave near the corner of Amherst & Gorham Avenues in Brentwood, CA. The reason, Street Widening, two Palm Trees, a Juniper Tree on Amherst, and a 4th tree, the magnificent Camphor Tree on the NW corner of Gorham and Amherst.

This is a condition that was forced upon the developer that is currently building the units on the corner lot.The City's own records confirm that Amherst does NOT carry a traffic load, making the destruction of these mature trees pointless.

Please sign this petition if you agree.

UPDATE 9/21/2016:

The public hearing has been scheduled to be held at:

CITY OF LOS ANGELES

BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS

PUBLIC HEARING ROOM

200 NORTH SPRING STREET, ROOM 350

LOS ANGELES, CA 90012

September 28, 2016 at 10:00AM


If unable to attend, you may submit an email to:

Fernando Campos, MPA

Executive Officer

Department of Public Works, Board Offices

[email protected]



Updates

April 18, 2016

I spent the morning staring at that beautiful Camphor tree and just trying to figure out how anyone could look at it and decide it needs to come down for a road that no one even uses. My inbox is full of your notes about how much these trees mean to our neighborhood and honestly reading them while the city stays quiet is the only thing keeping me focused right now.

Reached 100 supporters

April 18, 2016

116 Comments

N
neal bahu
10 years ago Featured

Everyone loves the trees on their blocks, they provide color and shade and beautify the streets. taking them out will decrease the property values, what point is there in this action. I have seen other cities build around the old trees and it looks great, instead of stripping the trees for blacktop and cement streets and sidewalks.

D
Dorin Natan
10 years ago Featured

Don't we need more oxygen? Isn't it necessary to keep our body and environment healthy?!! Why should we cut beautiful trees that are healthy and will help the environment and our body?! as a health care professional, I definitely see this act unnecessary and more harmful!

H
Heather B
10 years ago Featured

Unless these trees are diseased, they offer shade, which reduces electric need for air conditioning, habitat for birds, beauty in an ever increasing concrete and urban landscape. The city makes exceptions all the time so why cannot they do the same for this project?

N
Nancy Jacobsen
10 years ago Featured

One of the beauties and joys of otherwise overbuilt and densely populated South Brentwood is the abundance and variety of mature trees. They must never be sacrificed, especially when there is absolutely no need.

V
Vikram Budhraja
10 years ago Featured

Removing trees and requiring widening of a 60 yd half block segment of Amherst is totally wrong from an environmental, traffic, neighborhood serenity and beauty not to mention unnecessary community disruption. This requirement should be rescinded to preserve the community beauty and serenity.

J
Jackie
10 years ago Featured

There is not much traffic on this section of Amherst, the street does not need widening. Therefore the trees do not need to be cut down. Use the money to fix our sidewalks please.

A
Anonymous
10 years ago

Our neighborhoods need more green, not less.

S
Stacy Blair Young
10 years ago

These trees should not be removed. They add tremendous value to the neighborhood. Removal of these trees will create a starkness and is unnecessary.