Skip to main content

Save the Trees on Amherst & Gorham

116 Comments

A
Anonymous
10 years ago

Our neighborhoods need more green, not less.

S
Stacy Blair Young
10 years ago

These trees should not be removed. They add tremendous value to the neighborhood. Removal of these trees will create a starkness and is unnecessary.

D
Debbie Schneider
10 years ago

There is nothing to gain by widening Amherst from the alley to the street. That's not even a full block. The mature trees are one of the beautiful and charming things about our neighborhood. They should stay.

D
Debbie Schneider
10 years ago

Widening Amherst from the alley to the street is not even a block long. It serves no purpose. Do not cut these trees down! Our neighborhood is beautiful. Don't start ruining it.

A
Anonymous
10 years ago

The removal of these trees was forced upon the developer that is currently building the units on the corner lot.The City's own records confirm that Amherst does NOT carry a traffic load, making the destruction of these mature trees pointless.

J
june baumer
10 years ago

We need our trees!

K
Krystina robinson
10 years ago

Save the trees

A
Alex Siroky
10 years ago

LA needs more trees, not asphalt!

B
Bernie schiffer
10 years ago

Save the trees

S
Solveig Singleton
10 years ago

Please save the trees! All four of them.

G
Genevieve Daniels
10 years ago

Please do not remove the trees and widen the street! The new street cut will be irregular and unattractive and we will lose the beautiful trees.

J
julie Branca
10 years ago

Please say these beautiful trees

L
lisa day sandstrom
10 years ago

Please do not cut down these trees! There is no need for street widening where the trees are located. The city should be protecting trees NOT cutting them down.

R
robert sandstrom
10 years ago

Have lived near the corner of Amherst and Montana for a number of years. I fail to see how destroying the identified trees accomplishes anything. Widening one half the block on a relatively lightly traveled residential street seems to me a futile exercise for no demonstrable benefit. I recently returned from Shanghai. In the French concession in particular the value of trees for shade and rain protection and for aesthetics could not be more clear. As we deal with climate change trees both mitigate CO2 concentrations and add 02 to the atmosphere. The removal of mature trees that are healthy should be undertaken only with the highest level of justification. This proposed removal seems to have no substantive justification. Bob Sandstrom, Los Angeles

C
Cathy McMullen
10 years ago

Please do not cut down the trees. A lovely tree was already cut in what was the front yard of this property to make room for these 6 town homes. No need to destroy more trees. We need the oxygen and the shade.

P
Paris Alexander Walker
10 years ago

Hundreds of trees are being cut down in this neighborhood. This week alone, three trees were cut down at Amherst and Darlington Aves., only one block away. These trees once provided shade, beauty, oxygen and habitat. They are irreplaceable.

J
James Holcomb
10 years ago

Please reconsider.

K
Ken rosenblood
10 years ago

Far more dangerous conditions exist in our neighborhood that should be addressed.

S
Stephen Sharpe
10 years ago

The mature trees should not be removed.

M
Michael Crofts
10 years ago

The tree cutting is totally unnecessary!