Skip to main content

SAVE SOUTH RIBBLE LEISURE CENTRES

106 Comments

A
Andrew Lewis
7 years ago

We are all supposed to be conscious about pollution so let's close local facilities and move them 10 mile away at our expense.

A
Angela bishop
9 years ago

How can Leyland children access facilities outside town? We currently can't get to swim because of all the schools using Leyland pool - how could reduced facilities even cope with the numbers of schools?

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

Upgrading the existing leisure centres, which are in our communities, is better than building a brand new super facility in the middle of nowhere.

J
Janet Broughton
9 years ago

Just upgrade the existing leisure centres it would be less expensive than building a new complex and continue to serve the local communities.

E
Edwin Armstrong
9 years ago

The leisure centres serve their local areas and the people in those areas, a single large centralised centre would disadvantage the less well off people in those areas.

S
Sarah Chamley
9 years ago

PLC is a vital community hub, for young and old alike. It is an extremely popular local facility for the people of Penwortham. Swimming lessons are always fully booked, however, moving them to Farrington would see a great reduction in after school swimming classes due to the time/distance to get there.

P
Pauline Hough
9 years ago Featured

Don't close Penwortham Leisure center.I use it every day making good use of the wonderful classes on offer. My Grandchidren have swimming lessons there It's the heart of the community .Also my brother attended Heart beat classes.

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

At the moment I am able to walk to this leisure center. As I use public transport, and the 115 (Penwortham to Leyland) has now ceased, this would mean catching 2 uses.

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

I use Penwortham and wouldn't use one in Leyland. Pushing people to use over priced private gyms.

J
Jacqueline Evans
9 years ago

Come on, who do you want to do more exercise. Not the already fit gym bunnies who have cars and will drive to your new facility. You need the local leisure centres to get the oldies in, and the families without transport. They are the ones who need the exercise to keep your public health profile up and your health costs down.

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

As a weekly visitor to PLC I strongly object to the possibility of closure. These Leisure Centres are vital to the local community.

K
Ken Jones
9 years ago

Given the governments promotion of health, wellbeing and preventative exercise. This is a very short sighted policy. Have the published what subs would be to find them properly?

D
Dougie
9 years ago

We need more sporting facilies not less, to keep local kids off the streets

E
Emma Collins
9 years ago

I am opposed to the closures.

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

As a family of 5 each 1 of us uses penwortham leisure centre at least twice a week

J
Julie Wilkinson
9 years ago

Please don't close the leisure centres. Government are saying we need to keep active and fit, yet you are suggesting closing and Leyland is nowhere near Penwortham particularly if you don't drive.

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

I use Penwortham leisure centre 3 times a week. In retirement it's easy to get to and affordable. Don't close this local service.

V
Virginia Hayton
9 years ago

We need this leisure centre it would be a disaster to close it. Local nursery schools take their children swimming there and it's a huge success, my son goes with Whitefriars nursery every week during my working hours. We need to encourage young children to go to these leisure centres, not close them.

C
Clive Stack
9 years ago

The closure of leisure centres must not happen - it is simply wrong!

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

These leisure centres need to stay so they can be used by the whole community, young & old alike.