SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT MEETING
Through extensive analysis, the information presented for Warrant Article 4 is found to be inaccurate and misleading. The warrant was passed by 6 votes. The board has not signed the contract. They can choose to re-negotiate the terms of the CBA based on this new information.
The undersigned request a special School District Meeting for the purpose of revisiting Warrant Article 4 in light of new and substantive information.
14 Comments
This warrant needs to be brought back to the town based on factual information and clearly explained by the School Board.
It is of course warranted that warrants be presented with correct information. To have such a disparate distance between savings claimed to be gained moving from the existing contract to the proposed contract which actually will cost more with the difference of 186K or so voids the validity of the vote on Article 4 on 7 March 2020 at the Strafford School District meeting.
I believe false data being presented to the voters, warrants this being revisited.
I believe false data being presented to the voters, warrants this being revisited.
Unintentional or on purpose, there was false misleading info used. It needs to be fixed by the school board or I will have to assume fraud.
Please add my signature!!
Please take a closer look.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Copy link or share directly
SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT MEETING
Through extensive analysis, the information presented for Warrant Article 4 is found to be inaccurate and misleading. The warrant was passed by 6 votes. The board has not signed the contract. They can choose to re-negotiate the terms of the CBA based on this new information.
The undersigned request a special School District Meeting for the purpose of revisiting Warrant Article 4 in light of new and substantive information.
14 Comments
The numbers just dont add up. How can a contract that costs more be sold as a saving? The whole thing is misleading and we deserve a redo.
This warrant needs to be brought back to the town based on factual information and clearly explained by the School Board.
It is of course warranted that warrants be presented with correct information. To have such a disparate distance between savings claimed to be gained moving from the existing contract to the proposed contract which actually will cost more with the difference of 186K or so voids the validity of the vote on Article 4 on 7 March 2020 at the Strafford School District meeting.
I believe false data being presented to the voters, warrants this being revisited.
I believe false data being presented to the voters, warrants this being revisited.
Unintentional or on purpose, there was false misleading info used. It needs to be fixed by the school board or I will have to assume fraud.
Please add my signature!!
Please take a closer look.
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach 100 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via .
Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Signing with Google or Facebook verifies your signature instantly — no email needed.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Scan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
The numbers just dont add up. How can a contract that costs more be sold as a saving? The whole thing is misleading and we deserve a redo.