We the undersigned are shocked and very concerned about the decision by Candi management to cut the inclusive learning department. The proposals will lead to:
- Less ALS staff
- Less managers covering wider cross college duties
- More unqualified staff taking up the teaching duties of deleted ALS staff posts
The decision to cut the support of some of the most vulnerable students in the college seems a callous one. There has been a sharp increase in mental health issues amongst our students in the past three years as well as more students on Educational Health Care Plans. It is a poor decision that clearly does not start from the needs of our students.
Every department when asked what is the one thing they need more of they would answer - more in class and one to one support delivered by trained and qualified tutors. Every department knows the value of ALS and LSA staff. Not only because of the pastoral care they provide but also the role they play in ensuring our students gain the qualifications they desire through teaching and providing vital exam access arrangements specific to student's needs.
It is LSA/ALS staff that have on numerous occasions made the difference between students passing their qualifications or not.
This restructure will reduce the amount of ALS staff and replace them with LSAs. ALS staff are qualified teachers on a teaching contract, whilst LSAs are on a business supports contracts. The LSAs new contract not only adds more teaching duties into their roles but also cuts their wages by reducing the number of weeks they are required to work.
Candi has a long history of providing outstanding inclusive learning support to our students. Six years ago there were 14 FTE ALS posts at CBAT alone. Today there are 3FTEs with a much larger cohort of students who need support.
It was not that long ago the SMT use to boast about how the college spent more on this provision compared to any other college in London. This was when Ofsted rated us as an outstanding college. The SMT used to produce figures that showed that the LSA/ALS support added 14% to the college achievements rates.
For these reasons and more we call upon management to rethink their proposals.
Updates
January 18, 2023
The momentum is undeniable. Management needs to see that this level of concern is not going away.
Reached 100 supporters
January 18, 2023
42 Comments
Inclusive education is fundamental for ensuring all people are respected and permitted to enjoy education and all the social and emotional opportunities it brings. Don't cut inclusive education at City and Islington.
It is outrageous this is happening - we should be investing more, because more students will fail without this support. These members of staff are a valuable asset who's contracts should be bolstered further in order to keep their expertise and recognise the valuable role they play in the academic sector.
ill-timed and ill-judged. Our students deserve better. The dedicated staff that support them face being stripped of hours and pay. The proposal does little to address the need for greater investment in ALS and LSA support.
If this is about saving money, surely the amount involved is not that significant is it? If it's about some supposed improvement in efficiency/productivity how could that work? Vulnerable people having support withdrawn is not progressive.
A rankly appalling decision that punishes those most in need. Teachers of course will be blamed for the resulting drop in retention and achievement
What a shame that they want to get rid of such important services. They must not stop!
Once Ofsted have gone- this suddenly happens.Hmmmm....
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
By signing, you accept our Terms and Privacy Policy and agree to occasional emails about petitions. Unsubscribe anytime.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Copy link or share directly
We the undersigned are shocked and very concerned about the decision by Candi management to cut the inclusive learning department. The proposals will lead to:
- Less ALS staff
- Less managers covering wider cross college duties
- More unqualified staff taking up the teaching duties of deleted ALS staff posts
The decision to cut the support of some of the most vulnerable students in the college seems a callous one. There has been a sharp increase in mental health issues amongst our students in the past three years as well as more students on Educational Health Care Plans. It is a poor decision that clearly does not start from the needs of our students.
Every department when asked what is the one thing they need more of they would answer - more in class and one to one support delivered by trained and qualified tutors. Every department knows the value of ALS and LSA staff. Not only because of the pastoral care they provide but also the role they play in ensuring our students gain the qualifications they desire through teaching and providing vital exam access arrangements specific to student's needs.
It is LSA/ALS staff that have on numerous occasions made the difference between students passing their qualifications or not.
This restructure will reduce the amount of ALS staff and replace them with LSAs. ALS staff are qualified teachers on a teaching contract, whilst LSAs are on a business supports contracts. The LSAs new contract not only adds more teaching duties into their roles but also cuts their wages by reducing the number of weeks they are required to work.
Candi has a long history of providing outstanding inclusive learning support to our students. Six years ago there were 14 FTE ALS posts at CBAT alone. Today there are 3FTEs with a much larger cohort of students who need support.
It was not that long ago the SMT use to boast about how the college spent more on this provision compared to any other college in London. This was when Ofsted rated us as an outstanding college. The SMT used to produce figures that showed that the LSA/ALS support added 14% to the college achievements rates.
For these reasons and more we call upon management to rethink their proposals.
Updates
January 18, 2023
The momentum is undeniable. Management needs to see that this level of concern is not going away.
Reached 100 supporters
January 18, 2023
42 Comments
The Inclusive Learning Tutors assess the very high number of students who are referred to ALS for Exam Access Arrangements and support arrangements in class. They handle a huge volume of work and it seems impossible that a team of 13 tutors can be replaced by just three assessors.
Inclusive education is fundamental for ensuring all people are respected and permitted to enjoy education and all the social and emotional opportunities it brings. Don't cut inclusive education at City and Islington.
It is outrageous this is happening - we should be investing more, because more students will fail without this support. These members of staff are a valuable asset who's contracts should be bolstered further in order to keep their expertise and recognise the valuable role they play in the academic sector.
ill-timed and ill-judged. Our students deserve better. The dedicated staff that support them face being stripped of hours and pay. The proposal does little to address the need for greater investment in ALS and LSA support.
If this is about saving money, surely the amount involved is not that significant is it? If it's about some supposed improvement in efficiency/productivity how could that work? Vulnerable people having support withdrawn is not progressive.
A rankly appalling decision that punishes those most in need. Teachers of course will be blamed for the resulting drop in retention and achievement
What a shame that they want to get rid of such important services. They must not stop!
Once Ofsted have gone- this suddenly happens.Hmmmm....
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach 250 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via .
Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Signing with Google or Facebook verifies your signature instantly — no email needed.
By signing, you accept our Terms and Privacy Policy and agree to occasional emails about petitions. Unsubscribe anytime.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Scan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
The Inclusive Learning Tutors assess the very high number of students who are referred to ALS for Exam Access Arrangements and support arrangements in class. They handle a huge volume of work and it seems impossible that a team of 13 tutors can be replaced by just three assessors.