Protect Our Neighborhood
Formal Opposition to the Proposed Development Layout for Terre Vista Glen – Phase III
This petition is intended to address and oppose the current development plan for Phase III of Terre Vista Glen. While we support development and growth of Terre Haute, we do not feel this current layout aligns for the following reasons:
Incompatibility with Surrounding Development
The proposed lot sizes in Phase III—approximately 0.17 acres—are significantly smaller than the neighboring properties and the existing Terre Vista Glen subdivision. Currently, lot sizes in our area typically range from 0.28 to 0.33 acres. For context, my own property is just under an acre.Placing 0.17-acre lots directly behind homes with five times that space creates a jarring inconsistency. This isn't just a minor difference; it’s a noticeable step down from the development pattern established by The Woods, Dobbs Glen, Watertree, and the initial phases of Terre Vista.
Lack of Transitional Design
Sound planning requires a "graduation" or transition between different housing densities. There is no such transition here. Placing the highest-density lots in the project directly adjacent to the largest, most established properties is an abrupt change that ignores the existing landscape.
Infrastructure Strain
Smaller lots mean more households, more traffic, and more school-age children per acre, which can strain local infrastructure. A development of 60 additional homes will drastically increase traffic on Poplar Street, raising concerns about the safety of vehicles attempting to turn left (westbound) onto Poplar during peak hours. Without a clear traffic impact analysis or planned road improvements, we are inviting congestion and safety hazards into a residential corridor.
Use of Public Financing
The proposal includes the use of a TIF district to fund infrastructure. If public financing is used, the expectation should be that the development maintains—or exceeds—the standards already established in the area. Pairing a higher-density design with a request for public support raises serious concerns about long-term compatibility and overall planning quality.
Executive Housing Gap
Research indicates that Terre Haute is significantly lacking in the high-end housing required to attract and retain the leadership talent associated with recent industrial investments (like the $1.5B ENTEK project).
Market Saturation of Low-Tier Homes: Current market data shows that the "sweet spot" for organic development in Terre Haute is the $100,000–$300,000 price range, which moves the fastest. By approving more of the same, the city is failing to address the true deficit.
TIF funds should be used as a catalyst to build high-assessed valued properties ensuring the highest property tax return per acre.
Overall Development Approach
As currently designed, the proposal appears to emphasize increased density at the expense of compatibility with the existing development pattern and surrounding neighborhoods, which have otherwise been well planned and cohesive. A significant departure from this pattern raises concerns about long-term property values and neighborhood consistency.
We’ve already seen The City Council prioritize neighborhood integrity. Just last June, a project near Ohio Boulevard was turned down because it didn't fit the character of the area. We are asking for that same standard here. Communities like Dobbs Glen, Terre Vista, The Woods, and Watertree are Terre Haute’s premier neighborhoods. They provide the kind of spacious, top-tier living that is currently in short supply. We need to protect these areas as high-value residential pockets, especially if we want to give incoming executives a reason to plant roots here.
**Vigo County Area Planning will hold a meeting Wednesday, May 6th at 5pm in the Commissioners Conference room at the Vigo County Annex. Any person may offer verbal comment at the hearing. They will make a decision to move forward or oppose this plan on Wednesday.
Updates
Reached 100 supporters
May 5, 2026
37 Comments
The proposal to increase the density of homes in this new development causes me concern regarding increased traffic, increased toll on utilities and should not be approved. If this land is developed it should be consistent with the housing density of the surrounding area.
The previously approved development is sufficiently dense. Traffic and stormwater runoff need to be studied, as a minimum, before this can be seriously considered. I am currently reviewing the work that has been completed, but it isn't evident stormwater has been addressed.
Choose people over profits. And I understand the new developer doesn't even live in Terre Haute. Has he had a neighborhood forum? Talked to the residents. Has he considered 30 instead of 60 homes to do it the right way and profit in other areas of his property development portfolio? How did this receive city approval for 60 tiny lots?
The Terre Vista subdivision was never meant to be something resembling tract-style housing. Neighborhoods within much of the eastside of Terre Haute have always been maintained as family friendly neighborhoods with trees, larger lots and homes that are welcoming. As currently planned, these smaller lot homes will negatively impact the aesthetics of the area.
I agree with this 100%. We moved here from Texas and finding a home was not easy. Terre Vista Glen met all our needs and its a great neighborhood with great neighbors. As people are transferred in and out of Terre Haute, we want our home to retain its resale value. A more crowded neighborhood with very small lots and much smaller homes doesnt help our resale value, much less all the things listed in this petition. I agree there is a place and need for that type of neighborhood but not in our backyard.
Once again, the proposed development by Grable is the right development in the wrong place. What is proposed is completely incompatible with existing housing and will, indeed, cause issues with traffic.
I oppose the unwarranted expansion that differs substantially from the original plan.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
By signing, you accept our Terms and Privacy Policy and agree to occasional emails about petitions. Unsubscribe anytime.
Share this petition
Share this petition to help it reach more people.
Your share link
Couldn't copy automatically. Long-press to copy:
Protect Our Neighborhood
Formal Opposition to the Proposed Development Layout for Terre Vista Glen – Phase III
This petition is intended to address and oppose the current development plan for Phase III of Terre Vista Glen. While we support development and growth of Terre Haute, we do not feel this current layout aligns for the following reasons:
Incompatibility with Surrounding Development
The proposed lot sizes in Phase III—approximately 0.17 acres—are significantly smaller than the neighboring properties and the existing Terre Vista Glen subdivision. Currently, lot sizes in our area typically range from 0.28 to 0.33 acres. For context, my own property is just under an acre.Placing 0.17-acre lots directly behind homes with five times that space creates a jarring inconsistency. This isn't just a minor difference; it’s a noticeable step down from the development pattern established by The Woods, Dobbs Glen, Watertree, and the initial phases of Terre Vista.
Lack of Transitional Design
Sound planning requires a "graduation" or transition between different housing densities. There is no such transition here. Placing the highest-density lots in the project directly adjacent to the largest, most established properties is an abrupt change that ignores the existing landscape.
Infrastructure Strain
Smaller lots mean more households, more traffic, and more school-age children per acre, which can strain local infrastructure. A development of 60 additional homes will drastically increase traffic on Poplar Street, raising concerns about the safety of vehicles attempting to turn left (westbound) onto Poplar during peak hours. Without a clear traffic impact analysis or planned road improvements, we are inviting congestion and safety hazards into a residential corridor.
Use of Public Financing
The proposal includes the use of a TIF district to fund infrastructure. If public financing is used, the expectation should be that the development maintains—or exceeds—the standards already established in the area. Pairing a higher-density design with a request for public support raises serious concerns about long-term compatibility and overall planning quality.
Executive Housing Gap
Research indicates that Terre Haute is significantly lacking in the high-end housing required to attract and retain the leadership talent associated with recent industrial investments (like the $1.5B ENTEK project).
Market Saturation of Low-Tier Homes: Current market data shows that the "sweet spot" for organic development in Terre Haute is the $100,000–$300,000 price range, which moves the fastest. By approving more of the same, the city is failing to address the true deficit.
TIF funds should be used as a catalyst to build high-assessed valued properties ensuring the highest property tax return per acre.
Overall Development Approach
As currently designed, the proposal appears to emphasize increased density at the expense of compatibility with the existing development pattern and surrounding neighborhoods, which have otherwise been well planned and cohesive. A significant departure from this pattern raises concerns about long-term property values and neighborhood consistency.
We’ve already seen The City Council prioritize neighborhood integrity. Just last June, a project near Ohio Boulevard was turned down because it didn't fit the character of the area. We are asking for that same standard here. Communities like Dobbs Glen, Terre Vista, The Woods, and Watertree are Terre Haute’s premier neighborhoods. They provide the kind of spacious, top-tier living that is currently in short supply. We need to protect these areas as high-value residential pockets, especially if we want to give incoming executives a reason to plant roots here.
**Vigo County Area Planning will hold a meeting Wednesday, May 6th at 5pm in the Commissioners Conference room at the Vigo County Annex. Any person may offer verbal comment at the hearing. They will make a decision to move forward or oppose this plan on Wednesday.
Updates
Reached 100 supporters
May 5, 2026
37 Comments
Have concerns about long-term drainage issues given the presence of standing water currently along the south east edge (mosquito habitat). The security, visual and noise intrusion could be partially mitigated by the construction of a masonry wall approx 8 ft. by the developer. Would like to see drainage plan... Perhaps incorporating dry wells and increasing lot sizes/ reducing number of houses. Thanks
The proposal to increase the density of homes in this new development causes me concern regarding increased traffic, increased toll on utilities and should not be approved. If this land is developed it should be consistent with the housing density of the surrounding area.
The previously approved development is sufficiently dense. Traffic and stormwater runoff need to be studied, as a minimum, before this can be seriously considered. I am currently reviewing the work that has been completed, but it isn't evident stormwater has been addressed.
Choose people over profits. And I understand the new developer doesn't even live in Terre Haute. Has he had a neighborhood forum? Talked to the residents. Has he considered 30 instead of 60 homes to do it the right way and profit in other areas of his property development portfolio? How did this receive city approval for 60 tiny lots?
The Terre Vista subdivision was never meant to be something resembling tract-style housing. Neighborhoods within much of the eastside of Terre Haute have always been maintained as family friendly neighborhoods with trees, larger lots and homes that are welcoming. As currently planned, these smaller lot homes will negatively impact the aesthetics of the area.
I agree with this 100%. We moved here from Texas and finding a home was not easy. Terre Vista Glen met all our needs and its a great neighborhood with great neighbors. As people are transferred in and out of Terre Haute, we want our home to retain its resale value. A more crowded neighborhood with very small lots and much smaller homes doesnt help our resale value, much less all the things listed in this petition. I agree there is a place and need for that type of neighborhood but not in our backyard.
Once again, the proposed development by Grable is the right development in the wrong place. What is proposed is completely incompatible with existing housing and will, indeed, cause issues with traffic.
I oppose the unwarranted expansion that differs substantially from the original plan.
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach 250 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via .
Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Signing with Google or Facebook verifies your signature instantly — no email needed.
By signing, you accept our Terms and Privacy Policy and agree to occasional emails about petitions. Unsubscribe anytime.
Share this petition
Share this petition to help it reach more people.
Your share link
Couldn't copy automatically. Long-press to copy:
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Make your voice count today!
Scan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
Have concerns about long-term drainage issues given the presence of standing water currently along the south east edge (mosquito habitat). The security, visual and noise intrusion could be partially mitigated by the construction of a masonry wall approx 8 ft. by the developer. Would like to see drainage plan... Perhaps incorporating dry wells and increasing lot sizes/ reducing number of houses. Thanks