Skip to main content

Preserve Our Neighborhoods

27 Comments

A
Anonymous
6 years ago

Just reduce the size! How about 1 Building with 3 condos? Stop the madness!

S
Steven Cosmos
6 years ago

This proposal is not in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. This project will be detrimental to the neighborhood.

A
Anonymous
6 years ago

No more traffic

A
Anonymous
6 years ago

I’ve been driving by this house my entire life - this beautiful neighborhood was not designed for anything like what is being proposed, and I can’t imagine the traffic nightmare.

J
John Conway
6 years ago

Save the beautiful historic building, don’t ruin the neighborhood!

K
Karol Bartlett
6 years ago Featured

The road going back and forth in front of this property, as well as the feeder roads are already so jammed in the morning and afternoon commutes. Adding these condos is just a bad idea! The roads and the neighborhoods surrounding - not to mention the apple farm - just cannot withstand this growth.

A
Anonymous
6 years ago

Any time you pave over green space you are potentially causing problems for local waterways. I love this house, I've been driving by it for decades, it would be a loss!

C
Craig moore
6 years ago

Tone it down

B
Barbara
6 years ago

As a neighbor I understand your viewpoint. However, a school for 500 students will generate a ton of traffic on Pleasant Street and Saint Thomas Avenue. Schools are protected under the Dover amendment, it's a by right project and there is nothing that can prevent nor stop a school project. They have the right to open a school utilizing the same design. They are school owners. Think of the tumultuous traffic this will cause. Are you fighting the right battle?

A
Anonymous
6 years ago

Please preserve the historic house.

A
Anonymous
6 years ago

44 years in Natick, don't want to see this

S
Sean Levy
6 years ago

We live in South Natick and this would destroy the culture of the neighborhood!

C
Chris Durken
6 years ago Featured

I'm not opposed to development, but this proposal is wildly inappropriate for its location. Saving the facade is an appropriate goal, but multiple units on that small parcel is not the answer. This proposal does not fit the character of the surrounding neighborhood and is misuse of historic preservation zoning.

T
Terri Wagner
6 years ago Featured

I'm not opposed to development and restoring the dilapidated house into a structure of its former glory that is appropriate on that lot and befitting of the neighborhood, but putting in 3 buildings for 11 units is NOT complimentary or appropriate in this neighborhood.

P
Phil Corcell
6 years ago

Save South Natick from greed and collusion in Town Hall!!

P
Paul T Keyes
6 years ago

In support of my Pleasant Street neighbors, I am opposing the plans for the 50 Pleasant Street development.

J
Jean Egerhei
6 years ago Featured

I am strongly opposed to the development of a village proposed at 50 Pleasant St. Not only does it not fit in with the character of the existing neighborhood and impinges on privacy and well being of the abutters but the added traffic would cause a serious safety concern, drainage problem as well as destroying the natural landscape and vegetation in the area.

C
Carol Keefe
6 years ago

As a 40 year resident of this charming historic, single family neighborhood I am strongly opposed.

C
Cristina Gridley
6 years ago Featured

Absolutely opposed!! The consequences to the surrounding single-family owned properties would be highly detrimental and completely out of character for our neighborhood. We are zoned as single-family for this very reason; so as to not allow developers to come in, make a mess and walk away. Not on our street, not in our neighborhood, No Way!

L
Lisa Moss
6 years ago

Keep this beautiful home as a single family residence. There is way to much traffic on Pleasant Street already!