Please extend the public comment period on 212 Stuart Street an additional 90 days.
I am opposed to this project because it is located with in the Historic District and violates zoning height by 135 feet(469%). This project will destroy the historic character of Bay Village. It will set a precedent within the historic districts.
Z
Zach graves-Miller
9 years ago
Boston
E
Eric Schultheis
9 years ago
resident of 5 Melrose Street, Unit 4, Boston, MA 02116
M
Mike Cerruti
9 years ago
I am strongly opposed. There are enough places in the City where high rises can be built. I live in the back bay and you can see the effects of a few buildings that stand out like a sore thumb because of their height amongst all the other historic buildings
G
Gene Hale
9 years ago
I strongly oppose this project!
P
Parul Thakore
9 years ago
I strongly oppose the height of this building.
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
I am opposed to this project
S
Stephanie Brown
9 years ago
Strongly oppose this building as currently outlined.
W
William Bernarduci
9 years ago
Stand up and be counted. Help save the Bay Village Historic District!
J
JJ Quintal
9 years ago
The petition summarizes the reasons for my objection to the proposed 199 ft. tower. The building will dwarf the historic townhome buildings that predominantly populate Bay Village. Previous improvements to the subject parcel were 3-4 stories and my understanding is the current zoning is 35 to 65 feet. Taller buildings outside the Bay Village neighborhood footprint (the circa 1920s Boston Gas building and circa 1970s Revere Hotel) do not have the impact of blocking air and light to historic townhomes inside the Village and sit on busy street corners (outside the neighborhood footprint), Arlington and South Charles, respectively. If you look at the project rendering from the perspective of Statler Park (a prime example of public/private partnership that has beautified the City) Bay Village is completely covered by a wall of glass. While recognizing that development has many positive consequences to the City, I'm not supportive of this proposal unless the project team is willing to reduce the height of the building to a reasonable compromise from the current zoning.
Z
Zach graves-Miller
9 years ago
Keep history alive in Boston embrace our past don't forget it!
R
Roberta Meyers
9 years ago
wrong building in the wrong location
S
Sara Withington
9 years ago
This is not anti-growth, but common sense. Save the neighborhoods, save the parks, save the history, Encourage rational urban development Without ruining Boston's uniquely markeable personality. Why would we want to be any mundane city when we already have a personality to work with?
J
Jean Quintal
9 years ago
I oppose this building - it offers nothing - NO BENEFITS- to Bay Village. The owners will charge $4000 monthly rents x 133 units =$6.4 million in rent revenue a year (hypothetical but not way off) while Bay Village will get more traffic, trash, wind tunnel, no sun, no sky, more dog poop on our sidewalks. Talk about a wall - the building is a 199 foot WALL that blocks Bay Village from sunlight while the residents of this monstrosity will enjoy sunlight stolen from Bay Village!
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
Resident at 26 Melrose St; oppose 212 Stuart Stree
T
Tal Cohen
9 years ago
Its important to preserve and keep the spirit of Boston's history ALIVE !!!!!!!!!!!
Not all things can be bought with money !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and those who do not respect others will find themselves paying for their actions !!
C
Claudia Travis
9 years ago
This minolyth of grotesque proportion will: completely 'turn off' the only direct sun to South Cove (west) 230 Stuart handicapped and elderly, endanger us with hurricane winds, create danger mouse levels of noise, vermin & pests, obliterate the historical scale and beauty of our famous inclusive neighborhood and more. Every aspect of this solely $$$$ development creates danger, in addition to horrid conditions it promises to destroy safety & already eroding quality of life for us, those with little chance to relocate due to our needed accommodations.
G
Gina Bernarduci
9 years ago
I strongly oppose this project. It does not belong in Bay Village.
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
I am a Bay Village resident and oppose the proposed building at 212 Stuart St.
G
George C Brackett
9 years ago
This building, in height and design, is entirely out of keeping with the historic neighborhood of Bay Village, within whose limits it would stand, and whose height limits it would violate.
Please extend the public comment period on 212 Stuart Street an additional 90 days. I am opposed to this project because it is located with in the Historic District and violates zoning height by 135 feet(469%). This project will destroy the historic character of Bay Village. It will set a precedent within the historic districts.
Boston
resident of 5 Melrose Street, Unit 4, Boston, MA 02116
I am strongly opposed. There are enough places in the City where high rises can be built. I live in the back bay and you can see the effects of a few buildings that stand out like a sore thumb because of their height amongst all the other historic buildings
I strongly oppose this project!
I strongly oppose the height of this building.
I am opposed to this project
Strongly oppose this building as currently outlined.
Stand up and be counted. Help save the Bay Village Historic District!
The petition summarizes the reasons for my objection to the proposed 199 ft. tower. The building will dwarf the historic townhome buildings that predominantly populate Bay Village. Previous improvements to the subject parcel were 3-4 stories and my understanding is the current zoning is 35 to 65 feet. Taller buildings outside the Bay Village neighborhood footprint (the circa 1920s Boston Gas building and circa 1970s Revere Hotel) do not have the impact of blocking air and light to historic townhomes inside the Village and sit on busy street corners (outside the neighborhood footprint), Arlington and South Charles, respectively. If you look at the project rendering from the perspective of Statler Park (a prime example of public/private partnership that has beautified the City) Bay Village is completely covered by a wall of glass. While recognizing that development has many positive consequences to the City, I'm not supportive of this proposal unless the project team is willing to reduce the height of the building to a reasonable compromise from the current zoning.
Keep history alive in Boston embrace our past don't forget it!
wrong building in the wrong location
This is not anti-growth, but common sense. Save the neighborhoods, save the parks, save the history, Encourage rational urban development Without ruining Boston's uniquely markeable personality. Why would we want to be any mundane city when we already have a personality to work with?
I oppose this building - it offers nothing - NO BENEFITS- to Bay Village. The owners will charge $4000 monthly rents x 133 units =$6.4 million in rent revenue a year (hypothetical but not way off) while Bay Village will get more traffic, trash, wind tunnel, no sun, no sky, more dog poop on our sidewalks. Talk about a wall - the building is a 199 foot WALL that blocks Bay Village from sunlight while the residents of this monstrosity will enjoy sunlight stolen from Bay Village!
Resident at 26 Melrose St; oppose 212 Stuart Stree
Its important to preserve and keep the spirit of Boston's history ALIVE !!!!!!!!!!! Not all things can be bought with money !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and those who do not respect others will find themselves paying for their actions !!
This minolyth of grotesque proportion will: completely 'turn off' the only direct sun to South Cove (west) 230 Stuart handicapped and elderly, endanger us with hurricane winds, create danger mouse levels of noise, vermin & pests, obliterate the historical scale and beauty of our famous inclusive neighborhood and more. Every aspect of this solely $$$$ development creates danger, in addition to horrid conditions it promises to destroy safety & already eroding quality of life for us, those with little chance to relocate due to our needed accommodations.
I strongly oppose this project. It does not belong in Bay Village.
I am a Bay Village resident and oppose the proposed building at 212 Stuart St.
This building, in height and design, is entirely out of keeping with the historic neighborhood of Bay Village, within whose limits it would stand, and whose height limits it would violate.