Updates
Reached 500 supporters
October 14, 2020
October 11, 2020
The number of people joining this call for transparency is steadily climbing toward five hundred. This momentum proves that our frustrations with the current structure of Bio 100 are shared by many across campus. Please take a moment to forward this link to a classmate who is currently struggling so we can reach this milestone and demonstrate the scale of our concerns to the administration.
November 22, 2018
The momentum behind this conversation reflects how many of us have felt isolated in our struggle with the current structure of this course. It is heartening to see that so many students recognize the need for a more transparent and equitable approach to our education.
October 15, 2018
The stories shared in the comments reflect a recurring struggle that extends far beyond a single test score. This feedback provides a clear map of the systemic obstacles currently preventing students from academic success in this course. I am currently organizing these concerns to prepare for a formal discussion with the department.
Reached 100 supporters
November 11, 2011
107 Comments
Not every student is cable of teaching themselves, not every student is cable of going to the tutoring center, we pay matter to be hear to learn and to be taught, what’s the point of spending the money if we are just spending time teaching ourselves
We should be given a fair chance with resources to actually help us succeed in this class. This class should not be harder than upper science courses. 50 min recitation once a week does not help us understand 4 hours worth of materials.
Class needs to be examined. The level of high school biology lectures are being given while the exam questions are MCAT level. No exaggeration, some Princeton practice tests have these questions from the exams.
As someone who transferred schools and took this class , her format and teaching skills is un reliable and left for you to fend for yourself. I believe that’s not how teaching especially a science course should go. They need more of us in the stem field why teach in such a discouraging way ?
The professor is amazing and gives amazing lectures. However, the exams and quizes are impossible. There is no way to prepare for these and the information given in the lectures does not prepare you for the questions that will be thrown at you.
As someone who really has tried their best in science, this course completely discourages me. The abundance of content without reassurance makes you feel like a failure. I understand that Hunter is competitive, but when you create an environment that people have no space to succeed, its really disheartening.
Bio 100 and 102 need to be revaluated by having the exams actually reflect the textbook and being taught by professors who are aware of the students' go through
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
By signing, you accept our Terms and Privacy Policy and agree to occasional emails about petitions. Unsubscribe anytime.
Share this petition
Share this petition to help it reach more people.
Your share link
Couldn't copy automatically. Long-press to copy:
Updates
Reached 500 supporters
October 14, 2020
October 11, 2020
The number of people joining this call for transparency is steadily climbing toward five hundred. This momentum proves that our frustrations with the current structure of Bio 100 are shared by many across campus. Please take a moment to forward this link to a classmate who is currently struggling so we can reach this milestone and demonstrate the scale of our concerns to the administration.
November 22, 2018
The momentum behind this conversation reflects how many of us have felt isolated in our struggle with the current structure of this course. It is heartening to see that so many students recognize the need for a more transparent and equitable approach to our education.
October 15, 2018
The stories shared in the comments reflect a recurring struggle that extends far beyond a single test score. This feedback provides a clear map of the systemic obstacles currently preventing students from academic success in this course. I am currently organizing these concerns to prepare for a formal discussion with the department.
Reached 100 supporters
November 11, 2011
107 Comments
The class is way too big and it is hard to pinpoint what info we should focus on more. The fact that there are no practice exams make it even worse and it is just absurd that the lecture slides don't get posted. It is as though the professors want us to fail.
Not every student is cable of teaching themselves, not every student is cable of going to the tutoring center, we pay matter to be hear to learn and to be taught, what’s the point of spending the money if we are just spending time teaching ourselves
We should be given a fair chance with resources to actually help us succeed in this class. This class should not be harder than upper science courses. 50 min recitation once a week does not help us understand 4 hours worth of materials.
Class needs to be examined. The level of high school biology lectures are being given while the exam questions are MCAT level. No exaggeration, some Princeton practice tests have these questions from the exams.
As someone who transferred schools and took this class , her format and teaching skills is un reliable and left for you to fend for yourself. I believe that’s not how teaching especially a science course should go. They need more of us in the stem field why teach in such a discouraging way ?
The professor is amazing and gives amazing lectures. However, the exams and quizes are impossible. There is no way to prepare for these and the information given in the lectures does not prepare you for the questions that will be thrown at you.
As someone who really has tried their best in science, this course completely discourages me. The abundance of content without reassurance makes you feel like a failure. I understand that Hunter is competitive, but when you create an environment that people have no space to succeed, its really disheartening.
Bio 100 and 102 need to be revaluated by having the exams actually reflect the textbook and being taught by professors who are aware of the students' go through
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach 750 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via .
Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Signing with Google or Facebook verifies your signature instantly — no email needed.
By signing, you accept our Terms and Privacy Policy and agree to occasional emails about petitions. Unsubscribe anytime.
Share this petition
Share this petition to help it reach more people.
Your share link
Couldn't copy automatically. Long-press to copy:
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Make your voice count today!
Scan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
The class is way too big and it is hard to pinpoint what info we should focus on more. The fact that there are no practice exams make it even worse and it is just absurd that the lecture slides don't get posted. It is as though the professors want us to fail.