We, the undersigned parents and guardians of students enrolled at Flipper International School, write to express our deep concern and disappointment regarding the recent announcement of a new two and three-year school fee structure. We believe that this decision was made without adequate transparency, consultation, or consideration of the legitimate concerns raised by the parent community.
While the proposed structure appears to promote long-term planning and harmonization, it lacks the clarity, safeguards, and accountability required to support such claims. The clause stating that fees for students from Kindergarten to Grade 10 in all categories may change by the end of the second year is particularly alarming. This effectively allows additional fee increases beyond those already outlined, beginning in the 2026–2027 academic year. Such a provision undermines financial stability for families and casts doubt on the credibility of the proposed structure.
Moreover, the letter from the school outlines broad commitments to improving quality - such as professional development, facility upgrades, and integration of learning technologies - but fails to provide specific, measurable outcomes. These general statements do not offer sufficient justification for the significant fee increases and give the impression of ambition without concrete delivery plans backed by Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s) and Specific Measurable Achievable Relevant and Timebound (SMART) goals.
Most troubling is the lack of transparency in how this decision was made. There is no evidence that the Parent-Teacher Association (PTA) was formally consulted or that the strong concerns voiced by many parents during the most recent parent meeting were taken into account. This omission suggests a unilateral decision-making process, which contradicts the principles of shared responsibility and open communication that we expect from an institution like our beloved Flipper International School.
In light of these concerns, we respectfully call on the school’s leadership to:
- Clarify the decision-making process, including whether the PTA formally endorsed the new fee structure;
- Engage in open dialogue with parents and guardians before implementing any further changes;
- Provide a detailed justification for the fee increases, including specific investments, timelines, and expected improvements in educational quality;
- Ensure transparency and predictability by establishing a clear Fee Policy safeguarding arbitrary adjustments to fees;
- Recommit to inclusive decision-making, ensuring future policies reflect genuine consultation with the parent community;
- Suspend the ongoing re-registration process until the matter is resolved through transparent and inclusive engagement, and promptly communicate this suspension to all parents.
We believe that parents are essential stakeholders, not passive recipients of school policy. We urge the school’s management to uphold the values of transparency, accountability, and partnership by reconsidering the current approach and actively engaging with the parent body before proceeding further.
Sincerely,
The Undersigned and /or very Concerned(worried) FIS Parents
Updates
Reached 250 supporters
June 14, 2026
Reached 100 supporters
May 27, 2025
67 Comments
Education should not be run by greed, as prioritizing profit over learning undermines its fundamental purpose. When financial gain is the main motive, the quality of education suffers, often leading to inflated tuition fees that make it inaccessible for many. Education should be a pathway for empowerment and knowledge, not a commodity for very high profit.
I strongly urge the school management to show greater respect for the values and morals held by parents. While cultural differences are inevitable, decisions affecting our children should be approached with sensitivity and thoughtfulness. Education is not a commodity—it is a profound responsibility that shapes young lives, and it must be delivered in a way that honors the trust parents place in the school.
I am a Category 5 parent with two children attending SEMIT Brunch. I strongly object to the proposed increment for Categories 1, 2, and 3. The harmonization approach should not be from the lowest to the highest category; instead, it should aim toward the middle to ensure a fair and balanced adjustment for all categories.
I personally teach three children at FIS—two are in Categories 2 and 3, and one is in Category 4. With the recent large increase, we will face an additional payment of 140,000 next year and 90,000 more the year after. We kindly ask for your help to spread this adjustment over three years to make it more manageable.
As a concerned FIS parent, I strongly agree with the points raised in this petition. The apparent disregard for the PTA and parent input is deeply troubling, and it undermines the very foundation of a true partnership between the school and parents. Shared governance is crucial for a thriving school community, and this requires open communication and genuine consultation, especially on critical matters like fee increases. Rebuilding trust starts with transparency and a willingness to listen. We urge FIS to halt the re-registration process and engage in meaningful dialogue with parents before proceeding.
Don't support the big increase
Consult FIS parents
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Copy link or share directly
We, the undersigned parents and guardians of students enrolled at Flipper International School, write to express our deep concern and disappointment regarding the recent announcement of a new two and three-year school fee structure. We believe that this decision was made without adequate transparency, consultation, or consideration of the legitimate concerns raised by the parent community.
While the proposed structure appears to promote long-term planning and harmonization, it lacks the clarity, safeguards, and accountability required to support such claims. The clause stating that fees for students from Kindergarten to Grade 10 in all categories may change by the end of the second year is particularly alarming. This effectively allows additional fee increases beyond those already outlined, beginning in the 2026–2027 academic year. Such a provision undermines financial stability for families and casts doubt on the credibility of the proposed structure.
Moreover, the letter from the school outlines broad commitments to improving quality - such as professional development, facility upgrades, and integration of learning technologies - but fails to provide specific, measurable outcomes. These general statements do not offer sufficient justification for the significant fee increases and give the impression of ambition without concrete delivery plans backed by Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s) and Specific Measurable Achievable Relevant and Timebound (SMART) goals.
Most troubling is the lack of transparency in how this decision was made. There is no evidence that the Parent-Teacher Association (PTA) was formally consulted or that the strong concerns voiced by many parents during the most recent parent meeting were taken into account. This omission suggests a unilateral decision-making process, which contradicts the principles of shared responsibility and open communication that we expect from an institution like our beloved Flipper International School.
In light of these concerns, we respectfully call on the school’s leadership to:
- Clarify the decision-making process, including whether the PTA formally endorsed the new fee structure;
- Engage in open dialogue with parents and guardians before implementing any further changes;
- Provide a detailed justification for the fee increases, including specific investments, timelines, and expected improvements in educational quality;
- Ensure transparency and predictability by establishing a clear Fee Policy safeguarding arbitrary adjustments to fees;
- Recommit to inclusive decision-making, ensuring future policies reflect genuine consultation with the parent community;
- Suspend the ongoing re-registration process until the matter is resolved through transparent and inclusive engagement, and promptly communicate this suspension to all parents.
We believe that parents are essential stakeholders, not passive recipients of school policy. We urge the school’s management to uphold the values of transparency, accountability, and partnership by reconsidering the current approach and actively engaging with the parent body before proceeding further.
Sincerely,
The Undersigned and /or very Concerned(worried) FIS Parents
Updates
Reached 250 supporters
June 14, 2026
Reached 100 supporters
May 27, 2025
67 Comments
As a parent of four children, I strongly oppose the sudden fee increase. It places unnecessary financial strain on families without clear justification or transparent planning. I urge the school leadership to rethink this decision and engage in open, honest dialogue with the parent and PTA.
Education should not be run by greed, as prioritizing profit over learning undermines its fundamental purpose. When financial gain is the main motive, the quality of education suffers, often leading to inflated tuition fees that make it inaccessible for many. Education should be a pathway for empowerment and knowledge, not a commodity for very high profit.
I strongly urge the school management to show greater respect for the values and morals held by parents. While cultural differences are inevitable, decisions affecting our children should be approached with sensitivity and thoughtfulness. Education is not a commodity—it is a profound responsibility that shapes young lives, and it must be delivered in a way that honors the trust parents place in the school.
I am a Category 5 parent with two children attending SEMIT Brunch. I strongly object to the proposed increment for Categories 1, 2, and 3. The harmonization approach should not be from the lowest to the highest category; instead, it should aim toward the middle to ensure a fair and balanced adjustment for all categories.
I personally teach three children at FIS—two are in Categories 2 and 3, and one is in Category 4. With the recent large increase, we will face an additional payment of 140,000 next year and 90,000 more the year after. We kindly ask for your help to spread this adjustment over three years to make it more manageable.
As a concerned FIS parent, I strongly agree with the points raised in this petition. The apparent disregard for the PTA and parent input is deeply troubling, and it undermines the very foundation of a true partnership between the school and parents. Shared governance is crucial for a thriving school community, and this requires open communication and genuine consultation, especially on critical matters like fee increases. Rebuilding trust starts with transparency and a willingness to listen. We urge FIS to halt the re-registration process and engage in meaningful dialogue with parents before proceeding.
Don't support the big increase
Consult FIS parents
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach 500 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via .
Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Signing with Google or Facebook verifies your signature instantly — no email needed.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Make your voice count today!
Scan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
As a parent of four children, I strongly oppose the sudden fee increase. It places unnecessary financial strain on families without clear justification or transparent planning. I urge the school leadership to rethink this decision and engage in open, honest dialogue with the parent and PTA.