Skip to main content

The developer has officially canceled the conversion project at 1140 W Wilson Ave. We will continue monitoring all future zoning applications for this location to ensure the site remains focused on retail and residential stability.

March 8, 2024

Oppose the conversion of 1140 W Wilson Ave for Cornerstone's expansion

Oppose the conversion of 1140 W Wilson Ave for Cornerstone's expansion

🏆 Won — 576 supporters Verified

Final supporters

R
Roshan S.
C
Christopher P.
D
Daniel F.
S
Someone
H
Horace F.
S
Someone
S
Someone
J
Jon S.
C
Clayton C.
S
Someone
+566 more
SH
Started by Steve Hoffman 2 years, 6 months ago

By signing this petition, the residents and business owners of the 46th Ward are expressing deep concern about the project to convert the apartments above 2 Bears Tavern and Downstate Donuts at 1140 W Wilson into a transitional shelter -- an unprecedented experiment in combining a shelter with retail businesses in a single mixed-use building -- and we are insisting that Ald. Angela Clay of the 46th Ward at least slow down the process proceeding to allow accurately sharing details about the project and its potential impacts on our community.

We support new transitional shelters for individuals experiencing homelessness around Chicago, but this project is different:

It shares a mixed-use building with retail businesses: Let's be clear; this is an experiment. There are no examples of a non-congregate shelter successfully sharing a building with retail businesses in Chicago, or across the United States. And the businesses at this location have already expressed dire concerns regarding challenges in obtaining insurance coverage, loss of customers, threats to employees' safety, managing modifications to the buildings, uncertainty about the effectiveness of the shelter operator as a commercial landlord, and myriad other concerns. Long-time residents know how the Wilson corridor has bounced back in recent years, with 2 Bears Tavern, Downstate Donuts, and Uptown Church contributing to this growth. We risk losing these current and future businesses at that location.

Over-Concentration of Shelter Operations: There are currently 3 shelters within a 1-block radius of the proposed project, and with this, the neighborhood bears regular incidents near those shelters, threatening public safety and private property. The community is deeply concerned that adding yet another shelter would exacerbate those problems to a point that pushes away customers, new businesses, and residents. This would destroy the community value. NYC ran a study in 2019 finding that proximity to multiple shelters has a considerably bigger estimated impact on property values than closer proximity to a single shelter. We urge consideration of alternative solutions, such as expanding existing operations at the site of the former Epworth Church.

Improper Use of TIF Funds: The proposal uses public TIF funds -- which are earmarked to revitalize blighted areas to encourage economic development -- to "rehabilitate" a property that simply does not need rehabilitation. This clearly doesn't fit with the goals of the Wilson Yard TIF district, and the project has been less than forthcoming about the actual amount of TIF funding required.

Unique safety concerns for this shelter: This non-congregate shelter, though providing private spaces for occupants, limits staff's ability to monitor activities behind closed doors. The lack of curfews, background checks, and a policy permitting guests heightens safety concerns. And the shelter sharing the building with a late-night bar further complicates matters, posing significant risks for individuals with substance abuse issues. We urgently call for the implementation of stricter safety protocols.

Funding Stability and Accountability: The reliance on short-term DFSS contracts raises concerns about the shelter's long-term stability and accountability. We demand transparency and assurances regarding contingency plans for funding and property upkeep.

Misleading Communication and Rushed Processing: The manner in which project details have been communicated, including the misleading community survey results and unwelcoming community meeting, has eroded trust and failed to provide a fair and open forum for discussion.

Alderwoman Clay, we deeply care about the future of Uptown. While it has taken time to understand the complexities of this proposal, the community is now closely watching how you manage it. We urge you to heed our concerns and ensure that the best interests of our community are served.

Updates

Reached 250 supporters

February 13, 2024

Reached 100 supporters

February 12, 2024

February 11, 2024

We are currently moving toward the 250 signature mark which is the threshold required to request a formal meeting with Alderman Clay. Please send this link to your neighbors so we can finalize our request to present these concerns to the ward office this week.

February 10, 2024

We are approaching one hundred signatures which will provide the necessary threshold to request a formal briefing from the aldermanic office. Please forward this link to three local business owners or residents to help us reach this milestone by end of day. I am currently drafting a letter to the zoning department to ensure our concerns are on the official record.

161 Comments

A
Anonymous
2 years ago Featured

Displacing 40 residents to put a shelter in an area already served by shelters is not a good use of space. TIF funds are intended for improving blighted areas, how does this improve a building that was already recently renovated and fully occupied?

A
Anonymous
2 years ago Featured

This project seems so rushed without addressing the concerns of the public and the businesses that already occupy the building. I do not see any evidence that addresses the prevention of any potential negative impact on building and business safety and insurance.

A
Anonymous
2 years ago Featured

We need transitional supportive housing throughout the city. But this Wilson project is not the right location or model. Alderman Cappelman’s experience with an unsupervised shelter on Leland Ave (Heartland) is indicative of how this project can stress the community.

A
Annie Watson-Johnson
2 years ago Featured

I went to the open meeting via Zoom. And even though I was skeptical, I felt better. Now, I've learned the things that I was concerned about, are real. Feel a little bamboozled by the open meeting, honestly. So, I'm back to "no." again.

C
Claire Behnke
2 years ago Featured

With the Heartland Alliance Housing at the north end of the block and Mercy Housing within a half mile, there is not a need for additional housing for unhoused men in this area. There is a need for housing throughout the city of Chicago and it should be more evenly dispersed.

B
Bradley Antcliff
2 years ago Featured

Please reconsider this potential project. Two great businesses are currently on the ground floor and expressing concerns. Uptown has lost too many small businesses that help the neighborhood thrive and make it a great place to live.

C
Christopher Pries
2 years ago

Stop Cornerstone! No to Cornerstone Wilson Shelter!

A
Anonymous
2 years ago

I am opposed to the conversion at 1140 W Wilson into a shelter