Skip to main content
TO OPPOSE THE REOPENING OF GOOD SHEPHERD AS A HOMELESS SHELTER

TO OPPOSE THE REOPENING OF GOOD SHEPHERD AS A HOMELESS SHELTER

99 signatures 1 to reach 100
T
Tatianna s. signed
S
Someone signed
N
Nicole signed
A
Ashley G. signed
R
Robert B. signed
E
Erica H. signed
B
Bryan g. signed
L
Lee signed
A
Angelica h. signed
L
Lori M. signed
JG
Started by Jeremy Gonzales 7 months, 2 weeks ago

“Hi, my name is Jeremy Gonzales, and I live here in the neighborhood. I’m asking for signatures for our petition, the former Good Shepherd Church located at 550 Clark Street Toledo, Ohio 43605 is being considered for use as a homeless shelter, which could bring a lot of extra traffic and safety concerns into our residential area.

The proposed repurposing has raised concerns about:

* Increased safety risks

* Higher foot and vehicle traffic

* Crime and disturbance potential

* Strain on police and public resources

* Decrease in property values

* Incompatibility with the residential zoning and character of the neighborhood

Most Importantly we have several schools, daycares, a library & after school programs and kids walking these streets, and many of us are worried this could negatively affect the safety of our children and the value of our homes.

NOT TO MENTION WHEN CHECKING INTO ANY HOMELESS SHELTER YOU ARE NOT REQUIRED TO SHOW PROOF OF IDENTIFICATION. This could bring unidentified offenders to our neighborhood.

We’re asking the city to pause the sale until the community has a voice in what happens.

Would you be willing to sign the petition to help protect our community?”

33 Comments

E
Erica Harris
7 months ago Featured

Right idea, wrong location! Too many children in the area! 2 schools within 3 blocks, library and park.

K
Kennith Hade
7 months ago Featured

I lived in this neighborhood for 32 years and do not agree with this location being used there's already enough in this area should take it some were else

R
Ronnie Longoria
7 months ago Featured

My brother lives 2 blocks away. I worry about the safety of my four young nieces. I will continue to support programs and resources that are already available to the homeless.

L
Lloyd Castillo
7 months ago Featured

I live in the neighborhood as well. I’m all for helping people out but this is not the place for it. The neighborhood is already struggling with keeping crime and drugs out. I believe there has to be a better place for this shelter to be held at. Somewhere away from the things there running from not directly by it.

M
Margaret Ingram
7 months ago Featured

My heart goes out to the homeless among us, but many of these people are mentally unwell. I think moving them in to a residential neighborhood will put residents at risk; especially our children and elderly.

N
Nicole Magrum
7 months ago Featured

I don’t think it’s suitable for the neighborhood or the kids. The crowd it will bring into the neighborhood wouldn’t be good at all. I think it’s a thoughtful kind idea but not this location.

L
Lee
7 months ago

I understand the intention behind wanting to help the homeless, and I respect anyone who genuinely wants solutions. But this conversation needs to be rooted in facts and lived reality, not just emotion. First, TOLEDO ALREADY HAS MULTIPLE SHELTERS & SERVICES, not just Cherry Street Mission. There are overnight shelters, warming centers, and programs available. The issue is NOT SIMPLY A LACK OF BUILDINGS. Second. This is important. YOU CANNOT LEGALLY OR PRACTICALLY FORCE PEOPLE OFF THE STREETS. Many individuals experiencing homelessness DO NOT WANT SHELTER for a variety of reasons: strict rules, curfews, sobriety requirements, safety concerns, mental health challenges, or past negative experiences. Building another shelter does not automatically change that reality. Third, CHERRY STREET MISSION ALREADY OWNS THE FORMER MACOMBER SCHOOL, which has significant unused space. If the goal is capacity and support, converting existing, owned property into livable rooms would be a far more efficient and responsible solution than placing a new shelter into a residential neighborhood. Lastly, real solutions require community INVOLVEMENT BEFORE DECISION ARE MADE, not after. Residents, parents, nearby homeowners, and local businesses deserve transparency and a voice, especially when safety, zoning, and long-term impact are involved. Helping the homeless and protecting neighborhoods are NOT OPPOSING GOALS. We can and should do both, but only by addressing the real causes and limitations, not by pretending one new location will solve a deeply complex issue.

L
Lori Martinez
7 months ago

That's not a good area for that idea too many kids around that neighborhood for all the extra traffic.

Help this petition grow

Share it with friends to help reach 100 signatures.

Sign Petition

We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.

or sign with Email

Add a comment?

Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.

By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Share Petition

Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact

Copy link or share directly

Instagram
QR Code