Skip to main content

No school on the unsuitable Sutton Hospital council plot please!

168 Comments

A
Anonymous
10 years ago

It is unfair for the potential students not to have the space they need to learn and play. How can the Council be so blind?

S
Sharon Thomson
10 years ago

We already know the Sutton Hospital site is not suitable for a new school for all sorts of reasons so why is this being pursued by the council? One has to wonder. It is too small, it is in the wrong place and it would bring gridlock to an area that already suffers at peak times, with no parking other than that for residents. Total chaos!

J
Jan Sneyd
10 years ago

To already have 2 very busy schools gridlocking our estate every day is enough. The site is too small for another 2000 pupils in this area. Stop wasting money on consultative exercises that ignore the recommendations given. Use the Sutton Hospital site for the doctors surgery instead of the also too small site of the old Henderson Hospital.

R
Rosemary Brown
10 years ago

Traffic is already a nightmare round here, ridiculous to put a school here.

M
Martin Smith
10 years ago

Another crass building decision needing local residents to try and bring some common sense to bear. Listen to your own consultants for once. Totally inadequate space with poor road and public transport facilities.

G
Gay Thomas
10 years ago

I am opposed to the building of a school on this site because of the chaos this would create with excessive traffic and parking whilst parents drop off!

B
Bernard Crocker
10 years ago

Site is too small. Maybe it's because the Council bought the hospital site for 8 million, and now have to justify their decision.

A
Anonymous
10 years ago

This site is far too small and in the wrong place. The new school should be closer to the likely demand for secondary places, ie in the north of the borough

C
C . Clarke
10 years ago

Totally unsuitable,madness

C
Carol Nganga
10 years ago

The site is too small, and the effect on the local area would be horrendous

A
AMJ Wolffsohn
10 years ago

Not enough room for a school.

L
Lorraine Dobson
10 years ago

Rose Hill is better option.

A
Anne Pugh
10 years ago

The site is too small for the school. The consultants, employed by the Council at significant expense, found that according to official standards, even for a school on a restricted site with no outdoor space, it fails by 40%! Why has this not been acknowledged by the council & other feedback from a variety of relevant people been dismissed? Statements concerning " the possibility of linking the school with the potential Cancer Hub being the chance of a lifetime " are not helpful especially considering the current predicament of The Life Centre. The pressing need for the new school is not disputed and the children deserve the best facilities for their future within budget.

E
EMMA WOOD
10 years ago

THIS SITE IS TOO SMALL FOR THIS PURPOSE. PUBLIC TRANSPORT TO THIS SITE IS TOO LIMITED.

M
Mary Betts
10 years ago

The site is too small plus there are inadequate transort links.

C
CHARLES BETTS
10 years ago

No way! The Rose Hill site has many more advantages.

A
Anonymous
10 years ago

Site too small for facilities required; damaging to local environment; and harmful to local amenities and the residents who use/benefit from them.

N
Nela Simoes
10 years ago

The site is too small for the proposed construction and to include out door sporting facilities.

R
robert barritt
10 years ago

The site is too small and will be an eyesore to the surrounding area.

A
Anonymous
10 years ago

Area is too small and an imposition to residents in Chilton road and to traffic in the surrounding roads.