Skip to main content

St. Joe Company Too Dense For Mexico Beach

152 Comments

J
Joseph Sapp
7 years ago

I'm not against the developments but feel more discussion should take place.

R
Ronnie Kassaw
7 years ago

This is too much for Mexico Beach! There will too much traffic

A
Anonymous
7 years ago

This plan does not seem to be a good thing for Mexico Beach.

R
Robbie alley
7 years ago

I agree windmark is no big success story ,and the whole deal with the public boat ramps is appalling. We need details and a lot more than vague descriptions and empty promises, we also all want to protect out small hometown community for the long term not just a rush to get something new going that will longterm possible ruin our town of all our families and children.

J
Jason toole
7 years ago Featured

I completely agree, city leaders need to demand more information and consideration to this proposal before they agree to it. There is the previous history of the Company and their performance as well as too many unknowns. The increase in the acreage is also a concern.

S
Stephanie
7 years ago

No new developments!

C
Carole Rozier
7 years ago

Absolutely not!

R
Robbi Wendel
7 years ago

I would like more discussion and density caps on development.

D
Debra Rodgers
7 years ago

No!! Don’t do this to our little beach town! I can just imagine the traffic on 95 and how it will resemble the overcrowded commercialized beach down the road.

C
Cynthia Arnold
7 years ago

Save our piece of paradise.

A
Anonymous
7 years ago

When dealing with the power player St Joe Company, MB beach officials need to slow down, ask lots of questions and get legal representation as well as input from organizations like the Natire Conservancy, who have experience bringing St Joes kingdominium aspirations back down to earth (see for example, St Joes Summer Camp development in Sopchoppy, another ghost town).

J
John and Bette Lynde
7 years ago

Absolutely no. Mexico Beach and Port St. joe need to be careful . We do not want to be another PanamaCity Beach.

R
Richard Jones
7 years ago

Vote to disapprove please

L
Leonard Sisk
7 years ago

I oppose this type of expansion

T
Terry wise
7 years ago

The height elevation should be same as mb if not then ours should be good.

S
Sherry Pitts
7 years ago

No

R
Rock Kries
7 years ago

Keep the original agreement with less density. Their dog an pony show is about there bottom line (MONEY). MB will be changed and not for the better.

E
Elaine Blanton
7 years ago

Just no!

J
JOHN W HAMILTON
7 years ago Featured

Add to that the several hundred homes St, Joe Company is building in Callaway, the D.H. Horton project in Windmark, the Mormon project to the north of Mexico Beach and the normal growth of this area we are talking about too many people in too small a place to maintain our "Mayberry By the Sea" environment,

M
Mark Downing
7 years ago

The key word in all of this is “annex.” Meaning that The City of Mexico Beach will annex all of that property and once all the homes and businesses are built it will generate a lot of tax revenue for the city. That potential money will be hard to resist for the city leaders, no matter how honorable their intentions may be now. Mexico Beach is a tiny little town that has been completely destroyed by a hurricane and they need revenue like a baby needs milk. For the record I am not for it, but this is the kind of thing that I was afraid of happening after the hurricane. I love our little town the way it was. I don't want it to be some cutsie, yuppie, fake, beach resort town. Please keep Mexico Beach weird and funky.