Dear Mexico Beach Council Members,
As concerned neighbors of Mexico Beach, the signatures in this petition are opposed to the changes requested by the St Joe Company in Ordinance #722.
Specifically, we are referring to the request to change the agreements made with the city when the property was annexed in 2006. They are requesting an increase in density (from 750 to 924) and for the removal of the Tourist Mixed Use area. In our opinion, these changes are not in the best long-term interest of Mexico Beach and have too many unanswered questions to be approved at this time.
To date, the St Joe Company has provided minimal details regarding their plans, they held their “Community Input Session” in Pt. St Joe in March while most residents of Mexico Beach where displaced, still fighting insurance claims and/or trying to determine next steps to rebuild their personal property. Additionally, it seems the city has not been able to provide any further details on the plan.
While we all understand and fully support the need for our area to rebound from Hurricane Michael, we should not compromise on vague, short term/quick wins for the long-term stability of our area. Back in December, St Joe Company reported “The village will be on about 200 acres of property St. Joe owns just west of the canal on the north part of U.S. 98 next to the boat ramp. It will have a “mixture of uses” including apartments, “modestly priced” garden homes for locals and commercial retail with a “town center concept and gathering area.” Additionally, they added “Plans are being worked on and updated but current numbers given are approximately 400 garden apartments, 100 villa town homes and then a “couple” hundred single-family homes.”. They referenced 200 acres in this interview with The Panama City News Herald, however, the changes they have requested references 486 acres, not 200 as stated above. Additionally, one should ask why the property is bundled together versus each parcel being handled independently per the acreage shown on the Bay County Tax record.
As written, there are no restrictions on how the properties (even with existing density) would be divided across the referenced acres, another vagueness that could lead to heavily developing on one side of 98 or the other. This is appalling.
With regards to the high density that comes along with apartments and ‘moderately priced homes’ - is this what we want for Mexico Beach? How successful have Parker and Callaway been with their high-density community? We should look to our Bay county neighbors to see how well it is working out for them. Not to mention, will this St Joe Company investment turn into a repeat of their Windmark Property further down 98? Promises of beautiful, custom built homes only to later be sold out to lower quality homes by a completely different developer. And, how has the commercial space worked out for the community?
Like Windmark, The St Joe Company did not honor the commitment they made to Mexico Beach when they stated the property for what is now the boat ramp, would be given to the city. Instead, when the time came to build out the area, they denied the agreement and forced the city into a long-term lease of the property. Maybe there were legal oversights back then, but the city fully expected their word was their honor.
How will infrastructure to hook up to the new development be prioritized over infrastructure projects post Hurricane Michael? How will that be funded?
Lastly, if this new plan is approved, we should prepare ourselves for all the other ordinance changes that will follow.
As a publicly traded company, The St Joe Company has returns for their shareholders in mind, not the future of Mexico Beach. Please do not let their marketing hype confuse those two objectives.
The pictures below were included as exhibits in Ordinances 513 & 510 and show the property in question.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1t_WrHg7LlGeKYxCbx...
Thank you,
Mexico Beach Concerned Neighbors
Updates
June 22, 2019
The petition has now reached two hundred and fifty signatures. This level of engagement confirms that many residents remain deeply invested in the long-term stability of Mexico Beach.
Reached 250 supporters
June 21, 2019
Reached 100 supporters
June 20, 2019
June 20, 2019
We are rapidly approaching the threshold of 250 signatures. This milestone provides us with necessary leverage as we prepare to present our concerns to the Mexico Beach Council. Please invite others to review the petition so we can solidify our position before the upcoming review.
June 19, 2019
We are rapidly approaching one hundred signatures for this petition. Please ensure your circle is aware of the current density concerns regarding Ordinance 722 as we prepare to present this to the council.
152 Comments
Please don’t turn MB into Panama City Beach. I know we need tax base but this project seems very big and not enough info at this time for me to fully support it. We bought our home in 2017 and have been visiting MB for 30 years because we loved the simple laid back feel and small town atmosphere NOT Destin orPCB!!
My wife and I have just purchased a lot in nearby St Joe Beach because we like the small town atmosphere and lack of congested traffic. The beaches in Mexico Beach and St Joe Beach are not wide enough to support the increase in population that is proposed. Please keep Mexico Beach the way it was before Hurricane Michael.
I completely agree, city leaders need to demand more information and consideration to this proposal before they agree to it. There is the previous history of the Company and their performance as well as too many unknowns. The increase in the acreage is also a concern.
Add to that the several hundred homes St, Joe Company is building in Callaway, the D.H. Horton project in Windmark, the Mormon project to the north of Mexico Beach and the normal growth of this area we are talking about too many people in too small a place to maintain our "Mayberry By the Sea" environment,
Completely against increasing the number of apartments or garden type apartments. I’m just starting demolition on my 4plex that I lived in full time and we shouldn’t have to worry about this until after majority of HM homes have been rebuilt.
Left Destin because of the constant increase in tourism to the point you are miserable. Building in Mexico Beach because of the small town feel and wonderful people. Do not make this mistake.
Left Destin because of the constant increase in tourism to the point you are miserable. Building in Mexico Beach because of the small town feel and wonderful people. Do not make this mistake.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Copy link or share directly
Dear Mexico Beach Council Members,
As concerned neighbors of Mexico Beach, the signatures in this petition are opposed to the changes requested by the St Joe Company in Ordinance #722.
Specifically, we are referring to the request to change the agreements made with the city when the property was annexed in 2006. They are requesting an increase in density (from 750 to 924) and for the removal of the Tourist Mixed Use area. In our opinion, these changes are not in the best long-term interest of Mexico Beach and have too many unanswered questions to be approved at this time.
To date, the St Joe Company has provided minimal details regarding their plans, they held their “Community Input Session” in Pt. St Joe in March while most residents of Mexico Beach where displaced, still fighting insurance claims and/or trying to determine next steps to rebuild their personal property. Additionally, it seems the city has not been able to provide any further details on the plan.
While we all understand and fully support the need for our area to rebound from Hurricane Michael, we should not compromise on vague, short term/quick wins for the long-term stability of our area. Back in December, St Joe Company reported “The village will be on about 200 acres of property St. Joe owns just west of the canal on the north part of U.S. 98 next to the boat ramp. It will have a “mixture of uses” including apartments, “modestly priced” garden homes for locals and commercial retail with a “town center concept and gathering area.” Additionally, they added “Plans are being worked on and updated but current numbers given are approximately 400 garden apartments, 100 villa town homes and then a “couple” hundred single-family homes.”. They referenced 200 acres in this interview with The Panama City News Herald, however, the changes they have requested references 486 acres, not 200 as stated above. Additionally, one should ask why the property is bundled together versus each parcel being handled independently per the acreage shown on the Bay County Tax record.
As written, there are no restrictions on how the properties (even with existing density) would be divided across the referenced acres, another vagueness that could lead to heavily developing on one side of 98 or the other. This is appalling.
With regards to the high density that comes along with apartments and ‘moderately priced homes’ - is this what we want for Mexico Beach? How successful have Parker and Callaway been with their high-density community? We should look to our Bay county neighbors to see how well it is working out for them. Not to mention, will this St Joe Company investment turn into a repeat of their Windmark Property further down 98? Promises of beautiful, custom built homes only to later be sold out to lower quality homes by a completely different developer. And, how has the commercial space worked out for the community?
Like Windmark, The St Joe Company did not honor the commitment they made to Mexico Beach when they stated the property for what is now the boat ramp, would be given to the city. Instead, when the time came to build out the area, they denied the agreement and forced the city into a long-term lease of the property. Maybe there were legal oversights back then, but the city fully expected their word was their honor.
How will infrastructure to hook up to the new development be prioritized over infrastructure projects post Hurricane Michael? How will that be funded?
Lastly, if this new plan is approved, we should prepare ourselves for all the other ordinance changes that will follow.
As a publicly traded company, The St Joe Company has returns for their shareholders in mind, not the future of Mexico Beach. Please do not let their marketing hype confuse those two objectives.
The pictures below were included as exhibits in Ordinances 513 & 510 and show the property in question.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1t_WrHg7LlGeKYxCbx...
Thank you,
Mexico Beach Concerned Neighbors
Updates
June 22, 2019
The petition has now reached two hundred and fifty signatures. This level of engagement confirms that many residents remain deeply invested in the long-term stability of Mexico Beach.
Reached 250 supporters
June 21, 2019
Reached 100 supporters
June 20, 2019
June 20, 2019
We are rapidly approaching the threshold of 250 signatures. This milestone provides us with necessary leverage as we prepare to present our concerns to the Mexico Beach Council. Please invite others to review the petition so we can solidify our position before the upcoming review.
June 19, 2019
We are rapidly approaching one hundred signatures for this petition. Please ensure your circle is aware of the current density concerns regarding Ordinance 722 as we prepare to present this to the council.
152 Comments
I am year round resident and single family homeowner in Mexico Beach. 2004 Highway 98. I am firmly against rushing to any agreements without fully vetting and weighing options with the entire community. Recommend denying the current request.
Please don’t turn MB into Panama City Beach. I know we need tax base but this project seems very big and not enough info at this time for me to fully support it. We bought our home in 2017 and have been visiting MB for 30 years because we loved the simple laid back feel and small town atmosphere NOT Destin orPCB!!
My wife and I have just purchased a lot in nearby St Joe Beach because we like the small town atmosphere and lack of congested traffic. The beaches in Mexico Beach and St Joe Beach are not wide enough to support the increase in population that is proposed. Please keep Mexico Beach the way it was before Hurricane Michael.
I completely agree, city leaders need to demand more information and consideration to this proposal before they agree to it. There is the previous history of the Company and their performance as well as too many unknowns. The increase in the acreage is also a concern.
Add to that the several hundred homes St, Joe Company is building in Callaway, the D.H. Horton project in Windmark, the Mormon project to the north of Mexico Beach and the normal growth of this area we are talking about too many people in too small a place to maintain our "Mayberry By the Sea" environment,
Completely against increasing the number of apartments or garden type apartments. I’m just starting demolition on my 4plex that I lived in full time and we shouldn’t have to worry about this until after majority of HM homes have been rebuilt.
Left Destin because of the constant increase in tourism to the point you are miserable. Building in Mexico Beach because of the small town feel and wonderful people. Do not make this mistake.
Left Destin because of the constant increase in tourism to the point you are miserable. Building in Mexico Beach because of the small town feel and wonderful people. Do not make this mistake.
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach 500 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via .
Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Signing with Google or Facebook verifies your signature instantly — no email needed.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Scan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
I am year round resident and single family homeowner in Mexico Beach. 2004 Highway 98. I am firmly against rushing to any agreements without fully vetting and weighing options with the entire community. Recommend denying the current request.