Skip to main content

IPF Exec - Reverse Decision to Add Belts to Approved Equipment List

413 Comments

A
Anonymous
2 years ago

This is not helpful to the sport at all, me being in a 3rd world country cannot afford the specific brands that they approved!

W
Wayde Barnes
3 years ago

The name on the belt or who made it should have nothing to do with whether it should be able to be used in an IPF competition. Requiring money to be paid to be put onto an approved list is just complete nonsense. Measure the belts and approve them if they meet the correct size allowed, but money should never have to pass between hands for a person to use his or her equipment to compete.

T
Tim yost
6 years ago

very stupid

D
Don crisp
9 years ago

If u approve inzer then u should approve bobs belts. I have used both needless to say I still own bobs belt.

B
Benjamin Brown
9 years ago

This is ridiculous. Equipment that meets spec should be allowed. Not just approved based on who's giving you money.

D
David F Martinez
10 years ago

As long as it meets the regs it should be allowed

J
JOHNNY DAVIS
10 years ago

the rule is flat out ridiculas

A
Ashton McHardy
10 years ago

Stupid bloody rule, just another thing holding back the sport of powerlifting

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

another nail in the coffin for the sport

H
Harold
11 years ago

this rule really sucks

B
Brad Klinger
11 years ago

Reverse the decision to add belts and singlets to the approved list.

J
John Vitale
11 years ago

crazy, I am a USAPL member & certified Sr. National Coach, I called USAPL & said it was a rediclious rule. Basically they approved any product supplier who paid them 4 G regardless of quality. most belts, (not all), on the list are inferior products and poor quality. I was also told that IPF would only require listed gear at World meets and world record attempts. they weren't completely clear on it..I was also told I could use my none listed gear at local, state, & National meets that were USAPL / IPF sanctioned. That's what was explained to me by the USAPL Florida Rep.

C
Carlos
11 years ago

absolutely absurd, leather is leather for christs sake. given the belt falls into the thickness and width criteria it should not matter...I do own belts by approved brands but they are inferior in quality as to my main belt. under no circumstance will I consider competing in the ipf/usapl due to this abortion of a rule.

R
Richard Green
11 years ago

l will not join the lPF or attend IPF meets until this belt rule is abolished

P
Pytkin Eugene
11 years ago

-

D
dave kham
11 years ago

I completely support this reversal of the IPF 2015 list

J
Josh Meyer
11 years ago

This was a stupid rule to begin with. Clearly, this rule was instated as a means to fuel whatever greed the IPF's "higher ups" need satiated.

C
Callum Sims
11 years ago

It's silly how few businesses the IPF support

Z
Zoe Baker
11 years ago

Bob's Belts are Amazing... Everyone should be able to wear them. At no extra cost from the ipf for anyone.

D
Drew Hill
11 years ago

I have had my belt for years, and I've competed in it many times. It's special to me. To take this belt away - even though it meets all specs and requirements - is a selfish action of the IPF. This greed will have a negative implication for lifting, and I for one don't think it's the moral thing to do.