Skip to main content

I Support Officer Kerrick

3,555 Comments

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

No use to keep trying. He's innocent.

R
robert turner
11 years ago

praying for Officer Kerrick and his family.

C
Concerned Citizen
11 years ago

I support officer Kerrick and hope he will receive back pay from CMPD.

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

There is absolutely no sense in trying to pursue a conviction of Randall Kerrick just to satisfy the crowd mentality. If the first trial was 8-4 do you think a second one would convict him?

P
Pat Edwards
11 years ago

Policemen put their lives on the line every day. Who knows what they are dealing with in any given moment

G
Gary Anderson
11 years ago

Do not retry officer Kerrick

M
Michael Faires
11 years ago

spice

C
Chris jones
11 years ago

Drop all charges and no further action from jd

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

Please, AG Office, make the right decision to end this tragedy. Do not further prosecute Officer Kerrick.

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

Use our Taxes on REAL Criminal Trials.

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

I agree that Kerrick is innocent and should NOT be retried. This would be an absurd move!

S
Sgt. John T. MacF. Mood, HPD (SC)
11 years ago Featured

This officer shot until the threat stopped, as HE WAS TRAINED TO DO. He is not guilty of any crime. Justifiable homicide should have been the determination of a Grand Jury. The prosecutor in this case has an apparent prejudice against police officers.

D
Dan Pampinella
11 years ago

I think the jury trial was tainted . Mr Wilson for one, should of been dismissed with his statement on the number of times the perp was shot.

A
ALMA R AMSON
11 years ago

I VOTE FOR NO RE-TRIAL ON OFFICER KERRICK. I BELIEVE OFFICER KERRICK WAS DEFENDING HIMSELF !!

J
Jamie Neely
11 years ago

Should never have been charged.

N
Natalie mullis
11 years ago

100% behind Officer Keerick

R
Ryan
11 years ago

I do not think there should be a retrial

D
Darrell Griffin
11 years ago

The Jury has spoken.

C
Chancelor woodward
11 years ago

The jury held 8-4 in favor of them saying innocent. Why continue punishing a man for doing his job.

K
kathy Queen
11 years ago

The jury was 8 to 4 NOT guilty, so we need to honor our law enforcement officers enough to not try and punish them for making tough split second decisions. Enough really is enough!!