Hinchley Wood School - Impact of Proposed Changes to Admissions Criteria from Sept 2015
We, the undersigned DISAGREE with the proposals as outlined in Criteria 4a and 4b – Feeder Primary Schools and Catchment Area of the Draft Admissions Criteria 2015. We agree with the changes set out in Criteria 1 and 5.
Reasons for this include:
(1) The proposal to introduce feeder schools to Hinchley Wood School is not compatible with the need to ensure fair access to a local secondary school for all children living within the catchment area.
(2) Children living within the catchment area and attending non-feeder schools would have little to no chance of gaining a place at Hinchley Wood School compared to children in feeder schools. This would result in feeder school applicants living further away from Hinchley Wood School being offered places over non-feeder school applicants who live closer to the school.
(3) Criteria 4a also contradicts Hinchley Wood School’s attempt to “more effectively meet the needs of families committed to the local area” (Source: HWS Admissions Consultation 2015.) For example, in 2013 Hinchley Wood School was the second most popular destination for pupils from St Paul’s Catholic Primary. Had these proposals been in place in 2013, as a non-feeder school, these pupils would have not got into their local secondary school and would have been forced to travel considerable distances to an alternative school. It is equally a popular destination for pupils from St Andrew’s and St Mark’s C of E Junior School (“SASM”), Esher Church School and other local primary schools. The proposal therefore does not serve “families committed to the local area,” it discriminates against pupils at local faith based primary schools and further harms the environment by creating unnecessary traffic congestion.
(4) Applicants specifically from the Claygate Primary feeder school would have the choice of three local secondary schools, Hinchley Wood, Esher High and Chessington Community College. On the other hand, some non-feeder school applicants (from schools such as St Paul’s and SASM), who fall within the catchment area for Hinchley Wood School will find it impossible to get into a local secondary school in Elmbridge.
Updates
Reached 500 supporters
February 10, 2014
January 28, 2014
the momentum we have right now is honestly incredible and it shows how many people care about keeping our local school accessible. seeing this much support for our families makes me think we really have a shot at changing their minds.
January 28, 2014
just saw we hit 100 signatures today. i honestly didnt think this would get this kind of traction so fast but its clear a lot of us are worried about these changes.
Reached 100 supporters
January 27, 2014
8 Comments
Keep distance the priority. Feeder schools just complicate things and hurt the people actually living in the catchment area.
My son is at a non-feeder school and this change would basically mean he has zero chance of getting in. Madness.
73 Claygate Lane, Hinchley Wood. We moved here specifically for the school proximity and now this.
14 Manor Road North, Hinchley Wood, KT10 0AA. This is so unfair on local kids who live round the corner.
WHAT ARE THEY THINKING. This makes no sense for families who live right next to the school. PLEASE RECONSIDER.
21 Williams Grove, Long Ditton, KT6 5RN
21 Williams Grove, Long Ditton, KT6 5RN
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Copy link or share directly
Hinchley Wood School - Impact of Proposed Changes to Admissions Criteria from Sept 2015
We, the undersigned DISAGREE with the proposals as outlined in Criteria 4a and 4b – Feeder Primary Schools and Catchment Area of the Draft Admissions Criteria 2015. We agree with the changes set out in Criteria 1 and 5.
Reasons for this include:
(1) The proposal to introduce feeder schools to Hinchley Wood School is not compatible with the need to ensure fair access to a local secondary school for all children living within the catchment area.
(2) Children living within the catchment area and attending non-feeder schools would have little to no chance of gaining a place at Hinchley Wood School compared to children in feeder schools. This would result in feeder school applicants living further away from Hinchley Wood School being offered places over non-feeder school applicants who live closer to the school.
(3) Criteria 4a also contradicts Hinchley Wood School’s attempt to “more effectively meet the needs of families committed to the local area” (Source: HWS Admissions Consultation 2015.) For example, in 2013 Hinchley Wood School was the second most popular destination for pupils from St Paul’s Catholic Primary. Had these proposals been in place in 2013, as a non-feeder school, these pupils would have not got into their local secondary school and would have been forced to travel considerable distances to an alternative school. It is equally a popular destination for pupils from St Andrew’s and St Mark’s C of E Junior School (“SASM”), Esher Church School and other local primary schools. The proposal therefore does not serve “families committed to the local area,” it discriminates against pupils at local faith based primary schools and further harms the environment by creating unnecessary traffic congestion.
(4) Applicants specifically from the Claygate Primary feeder school would have the choice of three local secondary schools, Hinchley Wood, Esher High and Chessington Community College. On the other hand, some non-feeder school applicants (from schools such as St Paul’s and SASM), who fall within the catchment area for Hinchley Wood School will find it impossible to get into a local secondary school in Elmbridge.
Updates
Reached 500 supporters
February 10, 2014
January 28, 2014
the momentum we have right now is honestly incredible and it shows how many people care about keeping our local school accessible. seeing this much support for our families makes me think we really have a shot at changing their minds.
January 28, 2014
just saw we hit 100 signatures today. i honestly didnt think this would get this kind of traction so fast but its clear a lot of us are worried about these changes.
Reached 100 supporters
January 27, 2014
8 Comments
Totally disagree with these changes. Local kids should come first regardless of which primary they went to.
Keep distance the priority. Feeder schools just complicate things and hurt the people actually living in the catchment area.
My son is at a non-feeder school and this change would basically mean he has zero chance of getting in. Madness.
73 Claygate Lane, Hinchley Wood. We moved here specifically for the school proximity and now this.
14 Manor Road North, Hinchley Wood, KT10 0AA. This is so unfair on local kids who live round the corner.
WHAT ARE THEY THINKING. This makes no sense for families who live right next to the school. PLEASE RECONSIDER.
21 Williams Grove, Long Ditton, KT6 5RN
21 Williams Grove, Long Ditton, KT6 5RN
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach 750 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via .
Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Signing with Google or Facebook verifies your signature instantly — no email needed.
By signing, you accept iPetitions Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Make your voice count today!
Scan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
Totally disagree with these changes. Local kids should come first regardless of which primary they went to.