To: The Raleigh City Council
RE: Property located at 9322 and 9324 six forks road.
The Falls Lake Watershed needs protection. The Buffer/restriction/rules were put in place to protect the water supply and the Neuse River Basin
A developer in North Raleigh is requesting the City Council to grant a significant exception to established law codified in the City Code that prohibits impacts to sensitive water and natural resource buffer areas. The property in question in this case is LOCATED WITHIN A SENSITIVE PROTECTED WATERSHED BUFFER AREA.
The Code Sections in question, Chapter 9 of Part 10, were enacted specifically to critical natural resources and protect property owners and the from the potential adverse effects of development. In order for the ordinance to be overturned the landowner must suffer significant hardship so that the land is not useable. This is not the case with the above mentioned property.
The potential precedential value of the requested variance being granted within a protected watershed area is very troubling and should be avoided if at all possible . . . and in this case . . . .such a precedent can clearly be avoided.
The City of Raleigh, through the City Council, must uphold the terms of its own Ordinance. Therefore, since the Developer can not satisfy the terms of the Ordinance in connection with their proposed plan, then we hereby request that the City Council deny the requested permit, or approval, or variance that is being sought.
Please sign this petition to show your opposition to granting the above mentioned watercourse buffer variance in the watershed.
I have been reviewing the city code again and it is clear that these protections were created to keep our water supply safe for all of us. Spending time at the lake reminds me why this fight matters so much because once we lose these buffers we cannot get them back. My team is currently drafting a formal response to document exactly why this variance request fails to meet the legal requirements.
January 3, 2009
Seeing this kind of movement confirms that our neighbors understand the risk of ignoring our watershed protections. This momentum gives me hope that the council will finally listen to the people who rely on this water every single day.
7 Comments
R
Robert Schmidt
17 years ago
Featured
Not a hardship. That developer just wants more money. Keep the buffers in place.
J
Jasmine Hill
17 years ago
Featured
raleigh is growing way to fast and ruining all the nature spots. please just leave the watershed alone.
S
Sarah Abadi
17 years ago
Featured
Enough with the overdevelopment. We need clean water more than we need another strip mall in North Raleigh.
M
Mike Liu
17 years ago
Featured
Follow the rules you guys made. Why even have an ordinance if you let developers ignore it whenever they feel like it?
D
Donna Hunt
17 years ago
Featured
PROTECT OUR WATER SUPPLY! My kids drink this water.
K
Kevin Hassan
17 years ago
Featured
This sets a bad example for every other protected area in the city. Just say no to the variance.
To: The Raleigh City Council
RE: Property located at 9322 and 9324 six forks road.
The Falls Lake Watershed needs protection. The Buffer/restriction/rules were put in place to protect the water supply and the Neuse River Basin
A developer in North Raleigh is requesting the City Council to grant a significant exception to established law codified in the City Code that prohibits impacts to sensitive water and natural resource buffer areas. The property in question in this case is LOCATED WITHIN A SENSITIVE PROTECTED WATERSHED BUFFER AREA.
The Code Sections in question, Chapter 9 of Part 10, were enacted specifically to critical natural resources and protect property owners and the from the potential adverse effects of development. In order for the ordinance to be overturned the landowner must suffer significant hardship so that the land is not useable. This is not the case with the above mentioned property.
The potential precedential value of the requested variance being granted within a protected watershed area is very troubling and should be avoided if at all possible . . . and in this case . . . .such a precedent can clearly be avoided.
The City of Raleigh, through the City Council, must uphold the terms of its own Ordinance. Therefore, since the Developer can not satisfy the terms of the Ordinance in connection with their proposed plan, then we hereby request that the City Council deny the requested permit, or approval, or variance that is being sought.
Please sign this petition to show your opposition to granting the above mentioned watercourse buffer variance in the watershed.
I have been reviewing the city code again and it is clear that these protections were created to keep our water supply safe for all of us. Spending time at the lake reminds me why this fight matters so much because once we lose these buffers we cannot get them back. My team is currently drafting a formal response to document exactly why this variance request fails to meet the legal requirements.
January 3, 2009
Seeing this kind of movement confirms that our neighbors understand the risk of ignoring our watershed protections. This momentum gives me hope that the council will finally listen to the people who rely on this water every single day.
7 Comments
R
Robert Schmidt
17 years ago
Featured
Not a hardship. That developer just wants more money. Keep the buffers in place.
J
Jasmine Hill
17 years ago
Featured
raleigh is growing way to fast and ruining all the nature spots. please just leave the watershed alone.
S
Sarah Abadi
17 years ago
Featured
Enough with the overdevelopment. We need clean water more than we need another strip mall in North Raleigh.
M
Mike Liu
17 years ago
Featured
Follow the rules you guys made. Why even have an ordinance if you let developers ignore it whenever they feel like it?
D
Donna Hunt
17 years ago
Featured
PROTECT OUR WATER SUPPLY! My kids drink this water.
K
Kevin Hassan
17 years ago
Featured
This sets a bad example for every other protected area in the city. Just say no to the variance.
Not a hardship. That developer just wants more money. Keep the buffers in place.