Honest inconsistent information given over the last few weeks, and only trying to clarify specific information the week before the due date which still has inconsistencies within it. There should be an alteration granted for entire cohort maybe just including the abstract, introduction and discussion as it has been this way in past papers. Or a written section which we can all use (maybe written up by Julia herself), because three different documents with completely different results is not fair nor does it make any sense.