Honest inconsistent information given over the last few weeks, and only trying to clarify specific information the week before the due date which still has inconsistencies within it. There should be an alteration granted for entire cohort maybe just including the abstract, introduction and discussion as it has been this way in past papers. Or a written section which we can all use (maybe written up by Julia herself), because three different documents with completely different results is not fair nor does it make any sense.
Results indicated in the Lab report sheet originally given were then altered last minute in the lecture. The lecture did not add to my understanding of the results and only added to the confusion . I'm still unsure of whether to use the results given in the original document or in the lecture. I understand we were instructed to use 'whatever works' but this seems misguided and when given so late in the assignment puts everyone at a disadvantage.