Skip to main content

we actually did it guys and beach lane is officially the chosen landing spot. i cant thank you enough for sticking with me while we pushed for the shorter route and less construction chaos. lets just keep our eyes on the final project timeline so everything stays on track.

November 30, 2019

Landing the South Fork Wind Farm Cable at Beach Lane, Wainscott Causes the Least Disruption and Offers the Most Benefits for the Entire Community

Landing the South Fork Wind Farm Cable at Beach Lane, Wainscott Causes the Least Disruption and Offers the Most Benefits for the Entire Community

🏆 Won — 712 supporters Verified

Final supporters

S
Someone
S
Someone
N
Nathan M.
C
Catherine A.
S
Someone
L
Linda S.
S
Sharon R.
S
Someone
C
Caroline M.
S
Someone
+702 more
ND
Started by No Tri-Hamlet Disruption 6 years, 10 months ago

The South Fork Wind Farm ("SFWF") intends to construct 15 wind turbines 35 miles off the coast of Montauk that will ultimately deliver electric power to the Cove Hollow substation in East Hampton (see yellow circle on map image), projected to serve 70,000 households on the South Fork of Long Island. The developers' preferred landing spot for the Export Cable ("EC") to come ashore is Beach Lane in Wainscott (4.1 onshore miles), but they are now considering landing in Hither Hills (11.9 miles onshore), which would require the cable to be installed through Amagansett and East Hampton villages (and their respective Main Streets). We believe the Beach Lane landing site would cause the least disruption, and to be preferable for numerous reasons. Join us in urging both the developers and East Hampton Town officials to approve this preferred landing site and route to the Cove Hollow substation.

With regards to the project itself, we know that some of our local fisherman have raised concerns and we take those very seriously. We stand with them and we will work to see that an agreement is reached prior to the project moving forward.

Route Comparison

Hither Hills vs. Beach Lane

Above Ground Construction: 11.9 miles vs. 4.1 miles

Estimated Construction Period: > 2 years vs. < 12-months

Construction Path: Old Montauk Highway, 27 (Napeague), Main Street (Amagansett & East Hampton) vs. 2 miles of residential roads

Project Oversight & Control: State of New York vs. Town of East Hampton

Number Impacted: Thousands vs. 18 homes

Updates

Reached 500 supporters

September 20, 2019

Reached 100 supporters

September 6, 2019

6 Comments

D
Dave Park
6 years ago Featured

KEEP THE CONSTRUCTION OUT OF AMAGANSETT MAIN STREET. It is already a nightmare all summer long.

S
Sarah Verma
6 years ago Featured

Common sense says take the short route. Why make it harder than it needs to be for everyone living here?

T
Tom Hassan
6 years ago Featured

the traffic is bad enough as it is. dont turn the whole area into a giant construction zone for no reason.

J
Jessica McCarthy
6 years ago Featured

so tired of these planning changes. just pick the path that hurts the community the least and stick to it.

M
Mike Sanders
6 years ago Featured

12 miles of construction is crazy. nobody wants their street torn up for two years just because someone changed the plan.

L
Linda Duncan
6 years ago Featured

beach lane is the logical choice. lets get this done quickly and stop dragging it out for years.

Share Petition

Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact

Copy link or share directly

Instagram
QR Code